IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v142y2015icp111-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Single-stage Kanban system with deterioration failures and condition-based preventive maintenance

Author

Listed:
  • Xanthopoulos, A.S.
  • Koulouriotis, D.E.
  • Botsaris, P.N.

Abstract

Despite the fact that the fields of pull type production control policies and condition-based preventive maintenance have much in common contextually, they have evolved independently up to now. In this investigation, an attempt is made to bridge the gap between these two branches of knowledge by introducing the single-stage Kanban system with deterioration failures and condition-based preventive maintenance. The formalism of continuous time Markov chains is used to model the system and expressions for eight performance metrics are derived. Two important, from a managerial perspective, constrained optimization problems for the proposed model are defined where the objective is the simultaneous optimization of the Kanban policy, the preventive maintenance policy and the inspection schedule under conflicting performance criteria. Multiple instances of each optimization problem are solved by means of the augmented Lagrangian genetic algorithm. The results from the optimization trials coupled by the results from extensive numerical examples facilitate the thorough investigation of the system’s behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Xanthopoulos, A.S. & Koulouriotis, D.E. & Botsaris, P.N., 2015. "Single-stage Kanban system with deterioration failures and condition-based preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 111-122.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:142:y:2015:i:c:p:111-122
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015001490
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saumil Ambani & Semyon Meerkov & Liang Zhang, 2010. "Feasibility and optimization of preventive maintenance in exponential machines and serial lines," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(10), pages 766-777.
    2. Panagiotidou, S. & Tagaras, G., 2012. "Optimal integrated process control and maintenance under general deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 58-70.
    3. E. Iakovou & C.M. Ip & C. Koulamas, 1999. "Throughput‐dependent periodic maintenance policiesfor general production units," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 91(0), pages 41-47, January.
    4. Asadzadeh, S.M. & Azadeh, A., 2014. "An integrated systemic model for optimization of condition-based maintenance with human error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 117-131.
    5. Zhou, Xiaojun & Xi, Lifeng & Lee, Jay, 2007. "Reliability-centered predictive maintenance scheduling for a continuously monitored system subject to degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(4), pages 530-534.
    6. Lavoie, P. & Gharbi, A. & Kenné, J.-P., 2010. "A comparative study of pull control mechanisms for unreliable homogenous transfer lines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 241-251, March.
    7. Chen, Dongyan & Trivedi, Kishor S., 2005. "Optimization for condition-based maintenance with semi-Markov decision process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 25-29.
    8. Yu, Haiyang & Yalaoui, Farouk & Châtelet, Ėric & Chu, Chengbin, 2007. "Optimal design of a maintainable cold-standby system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 85-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Hongbing & Li, Wenchao & Wang, Bin, 2021. "Joint optimization of preventive maintenance and production scheduling for multi-state production systems based on reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    2. Asefeh Hasani Goodarzi & Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi, 2020. "Vehicle routing problem in a kanban controlled supply chain system considering cross-docking strategy," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2397-2425, December.
    3. A. S. Xanthopoulos & S. Vlastos & D. E. Koulouriotis, 2022. "Coordinating production, inspection and maintenance decisions in a stochastic manufacturing system with deterioration failures," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5707-5732, November.
    4. Yang Li & Qirong Tang & Qing Chang & Michael P. Brundage, 2017. "An event-based analysis of condition-based maintenance decision-making in multistage production systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4753-4764, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    2. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    3. Andriotis, C.P. & Papakonstantinou, K.G., 2019. "Managing engineering systems with large state and action spaces through deep reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Maria Chiara Magnanini & Tullio Tolio, 2020. "Switching- and hedging- point policy for preventive maintenance with degrading machines: application to a two-machine line," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 241-271, June.
    5. Zhang, Mimi & Gaudoin, Olivier & Xie, Min, 2015. "Degradation-based maintenance decision using stochastic filtering for systems under imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 531-541.
    6. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    7. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    8. Zhou, Dengji & Yu, Ziqiang & Zhang, Huisheng & Weng, Shilie, 2016. "A novel grey prognostic model based on Markov process and grey incidence analysis for energy conversion equipment degradation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 420-429.
    9. Hlioui, Rached & Gharbi, Ali & Hajji, Adnène, 2015. "Replenishment, production and quality control strategies in three-stage supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 90-102.
    10. Mosayebi Omshi, E. & Grall, A., 2021. "Replacement and imperfect repair of deteriorating system: Study of a CBM policy and impact of repair efficiency," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    11. Hlioui, Rached & Gharbi, Ali & Hajji, Adnène, 2017. "Joint supplier selection, production and replenishment of an unreliable manufacturing-oriented supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 53-67.
    12. Lirong Cui & Shijia Du & Aofu Zhang, 2014. "Reliability measures for two-part partition of states for aggregated Markov repairable systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 93-114, January.
    13. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.
    14. Huixia Huo, 2024. "Optimal Corrective Maintenance Policies via an Availability-Cost Hybrid Factor for Software Aging Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, February.
    15. Liu, Gehui & Chen, Shaokuan & Ho, Tinkin & Ran, Xinchen & Mao, Baohua & Lan, Zhen, 2022. "Optimum opportunistic maintenance schedule over variable horizons considering multi-stage degradation and dynamic strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    16. Xiaofeng Wang & Shu Guo & Jian Shen & Yang Liu, 2020. "Optimization of preventive maintenance for series manufacturing system by differential evolution algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 745-757, March.
    17. Zhao, Yunfei & Huang, Linan & Smidts, Carol & Zhu, Quanyan, 2020. "Finite-horizon semi-Markov game for time-sensitive attack response and probabilistic risk assessment in nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    18. Zhou, Zhi-Jie & Hu, Chang-Hua & Xu, Dong-Ling & Chen, Mao-Yin & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2010. "A model for real-time failure prognosis based on hidden Markov model and belief rule base," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 269-283, November.
    19. Panagiotidou, S. & Tagaras, G., 2012. "Optimal integrated process control and maintenance under general deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 58-70.
    20. Markus Bohlin & Mathias Wärja, 2015. "Maintenance optimization with duration-dependent costs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 224(1), pages 1-23, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:142:y:2015:i:c:p:111-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.