IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v104y2021ics0264837720324935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expanding grass-based agriculture on marginal land in the U.S. Great Plains: The role of management intensive grazing

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Tong
  • Jin, Hailong
  • Kreuter, Urs
  • Teague, Richard

Abstract

Compared to conventional tillage-based crop production, grass-based agriculture can support substantially more ecosystem benefits. Moreover, management intensive grazing (MIG) has the capacity to enhance grassland resilience, thereby enhancing the profitability of grass-based agriculture. The research reported here is based on a survey of 4,500 producers in the Great Plains of USA, which aimed to study the role of grazing intensity on producers’ land use decisions. We received 875 completed questionnaires, representing a 20.6% response rate of 4,250 eligible sample. Results from multivariate ordered probit modeling analysis indicated that, compared to continuous grazing (CG) users, MIG users were 11% more likely to have expanded their grassland area in the past and 13% more likely to convert cropland to grassland in the next 10 years. Other factors, including higher cattle sales, greater liability ratio, poorer land quality and regional factors, were found to significantly influence producers’ intentions to purchase and lease more grassland. However, these factors were not significantly associated with the intention to convert marginal land to grassland. Therefore, the adoption of MIG appears to be a key factor for restoring marginal croplands to permanent grassland cover to enhance the environmental benefits across the Great Plains from the social perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Tong & Jin, Hailong & Kreuter, Urs & Teague, Richard, 2021. "Expanding grass-based agriculture on marginal land in the U.S. Great Plains: The role of management intensive grazing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:104:y:2021:i:c:s0264837720324935
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837720324935
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Tong & Luri, Moses & Janssen, Larry & Hennessy, David A. & Feng, Hongli & Wimberly, Michael C. & Arora, Gaurav, 2017. "Determinants of Motives for Land Use Decisions at the Margins of the Corn Belt," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 227-237.
    2. Megan B. Machmuller & Marc G. Kramer & Taylor K. Cyle & Nick Hill & Dennis Hancock & Aaron Thompson, 2015. "Emerging land use practices rapidly increase soil organic matter," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-5, November.
    3. Claassen, Roger & Cooper, Joseph C. & Carriazo, Fernando, 2011. "Crop Insurance, Disaster Payments and Land Use Change: The Effect of Sodsaver on Incentives for Grassland Conversion," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 43(2), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Wang, Tong & Richard Teague, W. & Park, Seong C. & Bevers, Stan, 2018. "Evaluating long-term economic and ecological consequences of continuous and multi-paddock grazing - a modeling approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 197-207.
    5. Wang, Tong & Ayesh, Abubakr & Hennessy, David & Feng, Hongli, 2018. "Cropland Reflux: Trends In and Locations of Land Use Change in the Dakotas, 2007 to 2012 and 2012 to 2017," Bulletin 274938, South Dakota State University, Agricultural Experiment Station.
    6. Yann Clough & Vijesh V. Krishna & Marife D. Corre & Kevin Darras & Lisa H. Denmead & Ana Meijide & Stefan Moser & Oliver Musshoff & Stefanie Steinebach & Edzo Veldkamp & Kara Allen & Andrew D. Barnes , 2016. "Land-use choices follow profitability at the expense of ecological functions in Indonesian smallholder landscapes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Stephenson, Kurt & Bosch, Darrell J. & Groover, Gordon E., 2004. "Carbon Credit Potential From Intensive Rotational Grazing Under Carbon Credit Certification Protocols," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20225, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Hellerstein, Daniel & Malcolm, Scott, 2011. "The Influence of Rising Commodity Prices on the Conservation Reserve Program," Economic Research Report 262244, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Bastian, Chris T. & McLeod, Donald M. & Germino, Matthew J. & Reiners, William A. & Blasko, Benedict J., 2002. "Environmental amenities and agricultural land values: a hedonic model using geographic information systems data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 337-349, March.
    10. MacDonald, J., 2012. "Why are farms getting larger? The case of the US," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 47, March.
    11. Park, Jong-Yoon & Ale, Srinivasulu & Teague, W. Richard, 2017. "Simulated water quality effects of alternate grazing management practices at the ranch and watershed scales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 1-13.
    12. William J. Ripple & Pete Smith & Helmut Haberl & Stephen A. Montzka & Clive McAlpine & Douglas H. Boucher, 2014. "Ruminants, climate change and climate policy," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 2-5, January.
    13. Jakoby, Oliver & Grimm, Volker & Frank, Karin, 2014. "Pattern-oriented parameterization of general models for ecological application: Towards realistic evaluations of management approaches," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 78-88.
    14. Joseph M. Craine & Troy W. Ocheltree & Jesse B. Nippert & E. Gene Towne & Adam M. Skibbe & Steven W. Kembel & Joseph E. Fargione, 2013. "Global diversity of drought tolerance and grassland climate-change resilience," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(1), pages 63-67, January.
    15. Tong Wang & W. Richard Teague & Seong C. Park & Stan Bevers, 2015. "GHG Mitigation Potential of Different Grazing Strategies in the United States Southern Great Plains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Jianping Huang & Haipeng Yu & Xiaodan Guan & Guoyin Wang & Ruixia Guo, 2016. "Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 166-171, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Whitt, Christine & Wallander, Steven, 2022. "Rotational Grazing Adoption by Cow-Calf Operations," USDA Miscellaneous 333532, United States Department of Agriculture.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Che, Yuyuan & Feng, Hongli & Hennessy, David, 2021. "Assessing Peer Effects and Subsidy Impacts in Technology Adoption: Application to Grazing Management Choices with Farm Survey Data," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315123, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Hongli Feng & Tong Wang & David A. Hennessy & Gaurav Arora, 2022. "Over-Perception about Land Use Changes: Assessing Empirical Evidence and Linkage with Decisions and Motivated Beliefs," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 98(2), pages 254-273.
    3. Martin C. Parlasca & Matin Qaim, 2022. "Meat Consumption and Sustainability," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 17-41, October.
    4. Bardsley, Nicholas, 2021. "Recent Advances in Biofarming Show Potential for Rapid Soil Restoration, with Carbon, Health and Livelihoods Benefits," MPRA Paper 121184, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Che, Yuyuan & Feng, Hongli & Hennessy, David A., 2023. "Will adoption occur if a practice is win-win for profit and the environment? An application to a rancher's grazing practice choices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Arora, Gaurav & Feng, Hongli & Hennessy, David A. & Loesch, Charles R. & Kvas, Susan, 2021. "The impact of production network economies on spatially-contiguous conservation– Theoretical model with evidence from the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    7. Ritter, Matthias & Hüttel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Seifert, Stefan, 2020. "Revisiting the relationship between land price and parcel size in agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    8. Steven Stillman, 2005. "Examining Changes in the Value of Rural Land in New Zealand between 1989 and 2003," Urban/Regional 0509015, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Natalya Presman & Tanya Suhoy, 2024. "How have government housing programs affected developers' bids in Israel Land Authority land tenders?," Bank of Israel Working Papers 2024.08, Bank of Israel.
    10. Osteen, Craig D. & Vasavada, Utpal, 2012. "Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 2012 Edition," Economic Information Bulletin 132048, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Qenani-Petrela, Eivis & Noel, Jay E. & Mastin, Thomas, 2007. "A Benefit Transfer Approach to the Estimation of Agro-Ecosystems Services Benefits: A Case Study of Kern County, California," Research Project Reports 121605, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California Institute for the Study of Specialty Crops.
    12. Assogba, Noel Perceval & Zhang, Daowei, 2022. "The conservation reserve program and timber prices in the southern United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    13. Nadjia Mehraban & Christoph Kubitza & Zulkifli Alamsyah & Matin Qaim, 2021. "Oil palm cultivation, household welfare, and exposure to economic risk in the Indonesian small farm sector," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 901-915, September.
    14. Claudia Dislich & Elisabeth Hettig & Jan Salecker & Johannes Heinonen & Jann Lay & Katrin M Meyer & Kerstin Wiegand & Suria Tarigan, 2018. "Land-use change in oil palm dominated tropical landscapes—An agent-based model to explore ecological and socio-economic trade-offs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Oliver Lazarus & Sonali McDermid & Jennifer Jacquet, 2021. "The climate responsibilities of industrial meat and dairy producers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Ethan Gordon & Federico Davila & Chris Riedy, 2022. "Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 809-826, June.
    17. Helen Harwatt & Joan Sabaté & Gidon Eshel & Sam Soret & William Ripple, 2017. "Substituting beans for beef as a contribution toward US climate change targets," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 261-270, July.
    18. Chakravarty, Shourish & Villoria, Nelson B., 2020. "Estimating the spatially heterogeneous elasticities of land supply to U.S. crop agriculture," Conference papers 333156, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Ma, Shuai & Wang, Liang-Jie & Chu, Lei & Jiang, Jiang, 2023. "Determination of ecological restoration patterns based on water security and food security in arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    20. Chowdhury, Iftekhar Uddin Ahmed & Wang, Tong & Jin, Hailong & Smart, Alexander J., 2020. "Exploring the Determinants of Perceived Benefits of Rotational Grazing in the U. S. Great Plains," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304487, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:104:y:2021:i:c:s0264837720324935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.