IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v126y2024ics0305048324000288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study on policy decisions to embed flexibility for reactive recovery in the planning and scheduling process in operating rooms

Author

Listed:
  • Akbarzadeh, Babak
  • Maenhout, Broos

Abstract

The pursuit for achieving operational excellence in the operating room (OR) department is hampered by the uncertainty characterising the demand for healthcare resources. Incorporating this uncertainty is complicated because planning and scheduling decisions involving both resources and patients are typically organised according to a hierarchical decision structure in different phases. In this study, we link strategic, tactical, and operational decision-making and investigate the impact of policy decisions providing flexibility in the OR planning and scheduling process for reactive recovery to improve the operational outcome, achieving a trade-off between efficiency and consistency. We consider a sequential but interrelated proactive–reactive decision framework that is guided by both generic assumptions stated in the literature and real-life practice, mimicking all decision phases by relying on optimisation and trace-drive simulation. The analysis is performed via computational experimentation on a real-life dataset by varying the parameter settings associated with the availability of open OR capacity, clustering of surgeons, and duration of OR blocks. We compare the performance of well-known scheduling frameworks, namely, open booking and (modified) block booking, and provide insights regarding the necessary conditions to efficiently manage OR resources. The results demonstrate that constructing a master surgery schedule or an advance patient planning improves schedule consistency, whereas the re-scheduling of OR resources is indispensable to attain high OR utilisation. Insights are provided into the impact of different policy decisions that introduce flexibility in the OR planning and scheduling process to increase responsiveness to demand variability. To achieve satisfactory results, a certain degree of flexibility should be embedded via at least one of the policy decisions. However, together with potentially higher efficiency, higher variability in performance is observed such that different policy decisions should be attuned to each other.

Suggested Citation

  • Akbarzadeh, Babak & Maenhout, Broos, 2024. "A study on policy decisions to embed flexibility for reactive recovery in the planning and scheduling process in operating rooms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:126:y:2024:i:c:s0305048324000288
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2024.103061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324000288
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2024.103061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shah, Koonal K., 2009. "Severity of illness and priority setting in healthcare: A review of the literature," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(2-3), pages 77-84, December.
    2. Angela Testi & Elena Tanfani & Giancarlo Torre, 2007. "A three-phase approach for operating theatre schedules," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 163-172, June.
    3. Sebastian Hof & Andreas Fügener & Jan Schoenfelder & Jens O. Brunner, 2017. "Case mix planning in hospitals: a review and future agenda," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 207-220, June.
    4. Alessandro Agnetis & Alberto Coppi & Matteo Corsini & Gabriella Dellino & Carlo Meloni & Marco Pranzo, 2014. "A decomposition approach for the combined master surgical schedule and surgical case assignment problems," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 49-59, March.
    5. Maenhout, Broos & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2018. "A perturbation matheuristic for the integrated personnel shift and task re-scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 806-823.
    6. Loïc Deklerck & Babak Akbarzadeh & Broos Maenhout, 2022. "Constructing and evaluating a master surgery schedule using a service-level approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3663-3711, September.
    7. Pablo Santibáñez & Mehmet Begen & Derek Atkins, 2007. "Surgical block scheduling in a system of hospitals: an application to resource and wait list management in a British Columbia health authority," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 269-282, September.
    8. Bernardetta Addis & Giuliana Carello & Andrea Grosso & Elena Tànfani, 2016. "Operating room scheduling and rescheduling: a rolling horizon approach," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 206-232, June.
    9. Akbarzadeh, Babak & Moslehi, Ghasem & Reisi-Nafchi, Mohammad & Maenhout, Broos, 2019. "The re-planning and scheduling of surgical cases in the operating room department after block release time with resource rescheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 596-614.
    10. Aringhieri, Roberto & Duma, Davide & Landa, Paolo & Mancini, Simona, 2022. "Combining workload balance and patient priority maximisation in operating room planning through hierarchical multi-objective optimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 627-643.
    11. Bovim, Thomas Reiten & Christiansen, Marielle & Gullhav, Anders N. & Range, Troels Martin & Hellemo, Lars, 2020. "Stochastic master surgery scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 695-711.
    12. Di Martinelly, Christine & Meskens, Nadine, 2017. "A bi-objective integrated approach to building surgical teams and nurse schedule rosters to maximise surgical team affinities and minimise nurses' idle time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 323-334.
    13. Abdelghany, Khaled F. & Abdelghany, Ahmed F. & Ekollu, Goutham, 2008. "An integrated decision support tool for airlines schedule recovery during irregular operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 825-848, March.
    14. Freeman, Nickolas & Zhao, Ming & Melouk, Sharif, 2018. "An iterative approach for case mix planning under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 160-173.
    15. J. Essen & Johann Hurink & Woutske Hartholt & Bernd Akker, 2012. "Decision support system for the operating room rescheduling problem," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 355-372, December.
    16. Sergey Shebalov & Diego Klabjan, 2006. "Robust Airline Crew Pairing: Move-up Crews," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 300-312, August.
    17. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2015. "Inequity averse optimization in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 343-359.
    18. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    19. Borgonjon, Tessa & Maenhout, Broos, 2022. "An exact approach for the personnel task rescheduling problem with task retiming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 465-484.
    20. Esmaeil Keyvanshokooh & Pooyan Kazemian & Mohammad Fattahi & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2022. "Coordinated and Priority‐Based Surgical Care: An Integrated Distributionally Robust Stochastic Optimization Approach," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1510-1535, April.
    21. Benoit Roland & Fouad Riane, 2011. "Integrating surgeons' preferences in the operating theatre planning," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 232-250.
    22. Yagmur S. Gök & Silvia Padrón & Maurizio Tomasella & Daniel Guimarans & Cemalettin Ozturk, 2023. "Constraint-based robust planning and scheduling of airport apron operations through simheuristics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 795-830, January.
    23. Roshanaei, Vahid & Booth, Kyle E.C. & Aleman, Dionne M. & Urbach, David R. & Beck, J. Christopher, 2020. "Branch-and-check methods for multi-level operating room planning and scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    24. Thomas Schneider, A.J. & Theresia van Essen, J. & Carlier, Mijke & Hans, Erwin W., 2020. "Scheduling surgery groups considering multiple downstream resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 741-752.
    25. John T. Blake & Joan Donald, 2002. "Mount Sinai Hospital Uses Integer Programming to Allocate Operating Room Time," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 63-73, April.
    26. Seyed Hossein Hashemi Doulabi & Louis-Martin Rousseau & Gilles Pesant, 2016. "A Constraint-Programming-Based Branch-and-Price-and-Cut Approach for Operating Room Planning and Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 432-448, August.
    27. van Kessel, Paul J. & Freeman, Floris C. & Santos, Bruno F., 2023. "Airline maintenance task rescheduling in a disruptive environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 605-621.
    28. F. Davarian & J. Behnamian, 2022. "Robust finite-horizon scheduling/rescheduling of operating rooms with elective and emergency surgeries under resource constraints," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 625-641, December.
    29. Jonas Ingels & Broos Maenhout, 2017. "Employee substitutability as a tool to improve the robustness in personnel scheduling," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(3), pages 623-658, July.
    30. Jonas Ingels & Broos Maenhout, 2018. "The impact of overtime as a time-based proactive scheduling and reactive allocation strategy on the robustness of a personnel shift roster," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 143-165, April.
    31. Francisco Ballestín & Ángeles Pérez & Sacramento Quintanilla, 2019. "Scheduling and rescheduling elective patients in operating rooms to minimise the percentage of tardy patients," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 107-118, February.
    32. Ingels, Jonas & Maenhout, Broos, 2019. "Optimised buffer allocation to construct stable personnel shift rosters," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 102-117.
    33. Hadi Moradi & Shahram Shadrokh, 2019. "A robust scheduling for the multi-mode project scheduling problem with a given deadline under uncertainty of activity duration," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(10), pages 3138-3167, May.
    34. Penn, M.L. & Potts, C.N. & Harper, P.R., 2017. "Multiple criteria mixed-integer programming for incorporating multiple factors into the development of master operating theatre timetables," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 194-206.
    35. Pinar Keskinocak & Nicos Savva, 2020. "A Review of the Healthcare-Management (Modeling) Literature Published in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 59-72, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sean Harris & David Claudio, 2022. "Current Trends in Operating Room Scheduling 2015 to 2020: a Literature Review," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-42, March.
    2. Mariana Oliveira & Filippo Visintin & Daniel Santos & Inês Marques, 2022. "Flexible master surgery scheduling: combining optimization and simulation in a rolling horizon approach," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 824-858, December.
    3. Aisha Tayyab & Saif Ullah & Mohammed Fazle Baki, 2023. "An Outer Approximation Method for Scheduling Elective Surgeries with Sequence Dependent Setup Times to Multiple Operating Rooms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Loïc Deklerck & Babak Akbarzadeh & Broos Maenhout, 2022. "Constructing and evaluating a master surgery schedule using a service-level approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3663-3711, September.
    5. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    6. Omolbanin Mashkani & Andreas T. Ernst & Dhananjay Thiruvady & Hanyu Gu, 2023. "Minimizing patients total clinical condition deterioration in operating theatre departments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 821-857, September.
    7. Babak Akbarzadeh & Ghasem Moslehi & Mohammad Reisi-Nafchi & Broos Maenhout, 2020. "A diving heuristic for planning and scheduling surgical cases in the operating room department with nurse re-rostering," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 265-288, April.
    8. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    9. Şeyda Gür & Mehmet Pınarbaşı & Hacı Mehmet Alakaş & Tamer Eren, 2023. "Operating room scheduling with surgical team: a new approach with constraint programming and goal programming," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1061-1085, December.
    10. Akbarzadeh, Babak & Moslehi, Ghasem & Reisi-Nafchi, Mohammad & Maenhout, Broos, 2019. "The re-planning and scheduling of surgical cases in the operating room department after block release time with resource rescheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 596-614.
    11. Zhaohui Li & Haiyue Yu & Zhaowei Zhou, 2024. "Scheduling of elective operations with coordinated utilization of hospital beds and operating rooms," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 1-29, July.
    12. Lien Wang & Erik Demeulemeester & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2022. "On the use of partitioning for scheduling of surgeries in the inpatient surgical department," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 526-550, December.
    13. Penn, M.L. & Potts, C.N. & Harper, P.R., 2017. "Multiple criteria mixed-integer programming for incorporating multiple factors into the development of master operating theatre timetables," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 194-206.
    14. Steffen Heider & Jan Schoenfelder & Thomas Koperna & Jens O. Brunner, 2022. "Balancing control and autonomy in master surgery scheduling: Benefits of ICU quotas for recovery units," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 311-332, June.
    15. Borgonjon, Tessa & Maenhout, Broos, 2022. "An exact approach for the personnel task rescheduling problem with task retiming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 465-484.
    16. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    17. Belinda Spratt & Erhan Kozan, 2021. "An integrated rolling horizon approach to increase operating theatre efficiency," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 3-25, February.
    18. Brittney Benchoff & Candace Arai Yano & Alexandra Newman, 2017. "Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center Optimizes Operating Room Block Schedule for New Hospital," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 214-229, June.
    19. Sebastian McRae & Jens O. Brunner & Jonathan F. Bard, 2020. "Analyzing economies of scale and scope in hospitals by use of case mix planning," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 80-101, March.
    20. McRae, Sebastian & Brunner, Jens O., 2020. "Assessing the impact of uncertainty and the level of aggregation in case mix planning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:126:y:2024:i:c:s0305048324000288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.