IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joinma/v25y2011i4p226-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Interruptions Pay off? Effects of Interruptive Ads on Consumers' Willingness to Pay

Author

Listed:
  • Acquisti, Alessandro
  • Spiekermann, Sarah

Abstract

We present the results of a study designed to measure the impact of interruptive advertising on consumers' willingness to pay for products bearing the advertiser's brand. Subjects participating in a controlled experiment were exposed to ads that diverted their attention from a computer game they were testing. We measured subjects' willingness to pay for a good associated with the advertised brand. We found that the ads significantly lowered the willingness to pay for goods associated with the advertising brand. We do not find conclusive evidence that providing some level of user control over the appearance of ads mitigates the negative impact of ad interruption. Our results contribute to the research on the economic impact of advertising, and introduce a method of measuring actual (as opposed to self-reported) willingness to pay in experimental marketing research.

Suggested Citation

  • Acquisti, Alessandro & Spiekermann, Sarah, 2011. "Do Interruptions Pay off? Effects of Interruptive Ads on Consumers' Willingness to Pay," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 226-240.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joinma:v:25:y:2011:i:4:p:226-240
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intmar.2011.04.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094996811000326
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intmar.2011.04.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shapiro, Stewart & MacInnis, Deborah J & Heckler, Susan E, 1997. "The Effects of Incidental Ad Exposure on the Formation of Consideration Sets," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(1), pages 94-104, June.
    2. Deighton, John & Kornfeld, Leora, 2009. "Interactivity's Unanticipated Consequences for Marketers and Marketing," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 4-10.
    3. Winer, Russell S., 2009. "New Communications Approaches in Marketing: Issues and Research Directions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 108-117.
    4. Charles R. Plott & Kathryn Zeiler, 2005. "The Willingness to Pay–Willingness to Accept Gap, the "Endowment Effect," Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(3), pages 530-545, June.
    5. Jean-Louis Chandon & Mohamed Saber Chtourou & David Fortin, 2003. "Effects of Configuration and Exposure Levels on Responses to Web Advertisements," Post-Print hal-01796048, HAL.
    6. Alessandro Acquisti & Hal R. Varian, 2005. "Conditioning Prices on Purchase History," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 367-381, May.
    7. P. De Pelsmacker & M. Geuens & P. Anckaert, 2002. "Media context and advertising effectiveness: The role of context appreciation and context-ad similarity," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 02/162, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    8. Patrali Chatterjee & Donna L. Hoffman & Thomas P. Novak, 2003. "Modeling the Clickstream: Implications for Web-Based Advertising Efforts," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 520-541, May.
    9. Lohtia, Ritu & Donthu, Naveen & Hershberger, Edmund K., 2003. "The Impact of Content and Design Elements on Banner Advertising Click-through Rates," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 410-418, December.
    10. Weiyin Hong & James Y. L. Thong & Kar Yan Tam, 2004. "Does Animation Attract Online Users’ Attention? The Effects of Flash on Information Search Performance and Perceptions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 60-86, March.
    11. Michael A. Kamins & Valerie S. Folkes & Alexander Fedorikhin, 2009. "Promotional Bundles and Consumers' Price Judgments: When the Best Things in Life Are Not Free," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(4), pages 660-670, December.
    12. Chandon, Jean Louis & Chtourou, Mohamed Saber & Fortin, David R., 2003. "Effects of Configuration and Exposure Levels on Responses to Web Advertisements," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 217-229, June.
    13. F. Thomas Juster, 1966. "Consumer Buying Intentions and Purchase Probability: An Experiment in Survey Design," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number just66-2.
    14. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L & Thaler, Richard H, 1990. "Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(6), pages 1325-1348, December.
    15. Jing Wang & Bobby J. Calder, 2006. "Media Transportation and Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(2), pages 151-162, July.
    16. Russell, Cristel Antonia, 2002. "Investigating the Effectiveness of Product Placements in Television Shows: The Role of Modality and Plot Connection Congruence on Brand Memory and Attitude," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(3), pages 306-318, December.
    17. Rik Pieters & Luk Warlop & Michel Wedel, 2002. "Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 765-781, June.
    18. James H. Pedrick & Fred S. Zufryden, 1991. "Evaluating the Impact of Advertising Media Plans: A Model of Consumer Purchase Dynamics Using Single-Source Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 111-130.
    19. Kenneth Y. Chay & James L. Powell, 2001. "Semiparametric Censored Regression Models," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 29-42, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nawel Ayadi & Alexandre Lapeyre, 2016. "Consumer purchase intentions for green products: Mediating role of WTP and moderating effects of framing," Post-Print hal-03829732, HAL.
    2. Chen, Zihe & Zhu, Dong Hong, 2022. "Effect of dynamic promotion display on purchase intention: The moderating role of involvement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 252-261.
    3. Sousa Prado, Tiago, 2023. "Assessment of market power in digital markets: Conceptual framework and empirical strategy," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 278014, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. Marchand, André & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, 2013. "Value Creation in the Video Game Industry: Industry Economics, Consumer Benefits, and Research Opportunities," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 141-157.
    5. Avi Goldfarb, 2014. "What is Different About Online Advertising?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 44(2), pages 115-129, March.
    6. Bell, Raoul & Buchner, Axel, 2018. "Positive Effects of Disruptive Advertising on Consumer Preferences," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-13.
    7. Prado, Tiago S., 2021. "Assessing the Market Power of Digital Platforms," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238048, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    8. Tucker, Catherine E., 2012. "The economics of advertising and privacy," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 326-329.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bayer, Emanuel & Srinivasan, Shuba & Riedl, Edward J. & Skiera, Bernd, 2020. "The impact of online display advertising and paid search advertising relative to offline advertising on firm performance and firm value," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 789-804.
    2. Serhat Peker & Gonca Gokce Menekse Dalveren & Yavuz İnal, 2021. "The Effects of the Content Elements of Online Banner Ads on Visual Attention: Evidence from An-Eye-Tracking Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Kim, Juran & Kang, Seungmook & Lee, Ki Hoon, 2021. "Evolution of digital marketing communication: Bibliometric analysis and network visualization from key articles," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 552-563.
    4. Bellman, Steven & Schweda, Anika & Varan, Duane, 2012. "Interactive TV advertising: iTV ad executional factors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 831-839.
    5. Eran Rubin & Amir Rubin, 2021. "On the economic effects of the text completion interface: empirical analysis of financial markets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 717-735, September.
    6. Lohtia, Ritu & Donthu, Naveen & Yaveroglu, Idil, 2007. "Evaluating the efficiency of Internet banner advertisements," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 365-370, April.
    7. Avi Goldfarb & Catherine Tucker, 2011. "Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 389-404, 05-06.
    8. Rizwan Raheem Ahmed & Dalia Streimikiene & Gerhard Berchtold & Jolita Vveinhardt & Zahid Ali Channar & Riaz Hussain Soomro, 2019. "Effectiveness of Online Digital Media Advertising as A Strategic Tool for Building Brand Sustainability: Evidence from FMCGs and Services Sectors of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-40, June.
    9. Calder, Bobby J. & Malthouse, Edward C. & Schaedel, Ute, 2009. "An Experimental Study of the Relationship between Online Engagement and Advertising Effectiveness," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 321-331.
    10. Botond Kőszegi & Matthew Rabin, 2006. "A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(4), pages 1133-1165.
    11. Rosenboim, Mosi & Shavit, Tal & Cohen, Chen, 2013. "Do bidders require a monetary premium for cognitive effort in an auction?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 99-105.
    12. Stefano DellaVigna, 2009. "Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 315-372, June.
    13. James C. Cox & Vjollca Sadiraj, 2018. "Incentives," Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series 2018-01, Experimental Economics Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    14. Kim, Younjun, 2015. "Essays on firm location decisions, regional development and choices under risk," ISU General Staff Papers 201501010800005579, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    15. Dragicevic, Arnaud Z. & Ettinger, David, 2011. "Private Valuation of a Public Good in Three Auction Mechanisms," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 1-29, April.
    16. Oben K Bayrak & Bengt Kriström, 2016. "Is there a valuation gap? The case of interval valuations," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(1), pages 218-236.
    17. Stefan Bechtold & Christoph Engel, 2017. "The Valuation of Moral Rights: A Field Experiment," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2017_04, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    18. De Borger, Bruno & Fosgerau, Mogens, 2007. "Discrete choices and the trade-off between money and time: A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences," MPRA Paper 3904, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Graves Philip E., 2012. "Benefit-Cost Analysis of Environmental Projects: A Plethora of Biases Understating Net Benefits," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 1-25, August.
    20. Domenico Colucci & Chiara Franco & Vincenzo Valori, 2021. "Endowment effects at different time scenarios: the role of ownership and possession," Discussion Papers 2021/279, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joinma:v:25:y:2011:i:4:p:226-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-interactive-marketing/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.