IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v91y2003i1p51-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High procedural fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations: An attributional analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Brockner, Joel
  • Heuer, Larry
  • Magner, Nace
  • Folger, Robert
  • Umphress, Elizabeth
  • van den Bos, Kees
  • Vermunt, Riel
  • Magner, Mary
  • Siegel, Phyllis

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Brockner, Joel & Heuer, Larry & Magner, Nace & Folger, Robert & Umphress, Elizabeth & van den Bos, Kees & Vermunt, Riel & Magner, Mary & Siegel, Phyllis, 2003. "High procedural fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations: An attributional analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 51-68, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:91:y:2003:i:1:p:51-68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749-5978(02)00531-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ployhart, Robert E. & Ryan, Ann Marie, 1997. "Toward an Explanation of Applicant Reactions: An Examination of Organizational Justice and Attribution Frameworks," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 308-335, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Müller, Patrick A. & Janßen, Jana & Jarzina, Dominique, 2007. "Applicants reactions to selection procedures : prediction uncertainty as a moderator of the relationship between procedural fairness and organizational attractiveness," Papers 07-17, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    2. Müller, Patrick A. & Janßen, Jana & Jarzina, Dominique, 2007. "Applicants’ reactions to selection procedures – Prediction uncertainty as a moderator of the relationship between procedural fairness and organizational attractiveness," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 07-17, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
    3. Holmvall, Camilla M. & Bobocel, D. Ramona, 2008. "What fair procedures say about me: Self-construals and reactions to procedural fairness," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 147-168, March.
    4. Cropanzano, Russell & Paddock, Layne & Rupp, Deborah E. & Bagger, Jessica & Baldwin, Amanda, 2008. "How regulatory focus impacts the process-by-outcome interaction for perceived fairness and emotions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 36-51, January.
    5. Viglia, Giampaolo & Abrate, Graziano, 2014. "How social comparison influences reference price formation in a service context," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 168-180.
    6. Jacob S. Bower-Bir, 2021. "Earning our place, more or less: responsibility’s flexible relationship with desert in socioeconomic standing," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(1), pages 131-170, April.
    7. Mathur, Pragya & Sarin Jain, Shalini, 2020. "Not all that glitters is golden: The impact of procedural fairness perceptions on firm evaluations and customer satisfaction with favorable outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 357-367.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Şaban ESEN & Aslı ÇİLLİOĞLU KARADEMİR, 2014. "A Study of Relatıonship between Perceived Organızational Justice and Individualism Collectivism Values Among Academic Staff," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(5), pages 400-410.
    2. Horvath, Michael & Ryan, Ann Marie & Stierwalt, Sandra L., 2000. "The Influence of Explanations for Selection Test Use, Outcome Favorability, and Self-Efficacy on Test-Taker Perceptions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 310-330, November.
    3. Buil, Isabel & Catalán, Sara & Martínez, Eva, 2020. "Understanding applicants’ reactions to gamified recruitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 41-50.
    4. van den Bos, Kees, 2002. "Assimilation and contrast in organizational justice: The role of primed mindsets in the psychology of the fair process effect," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 866-880, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:91:y:2003:i:1:p:51-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.