IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v77y2017icp102-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The real campaign: The role of authenticity in the effectiveness of advertising disclaimers in digitally enhanced images

Author

Listed:
  • Cornelis, Erlinde
  • Peter, Paula C.

Abstract

In a series of three experimental studies, this research examines the effects of a retouch-free vs. retouched disclaimer on appearance satisfaction, advertising effectiveness, and evaluation of other women. Our results show the positive effect of a retouch-free disclaimer on appearance satisfaction, attitude toward the ad, and purchase intentions (Study 1) based on authenticity and its components: realism and meaningfulness of the ad (Study 2). Interestingly, results are in the opposite direction considering the evaluation of other women, who are evaluated as less attractive when exposed to a retouch-free disclaimer (Study 3). This study provides valuable insights from a theoretical and managerial perspective on how marketers can appeal to Millennials without overtly telling them they are authentic.

Suggested Citation

  • Cornelis, Erlinde & Peter, Paula C., 2017. "The real campaign: The role of authenticity in the effectiveness of advertising disclaimers in digitally enhanced images," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 102-112.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:77:y:2017:i:c:p:102-112
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296317301066
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bearden, William O & Hardesty, David M & Rose, Randall L, 2001. "Consumer Self-Confidence: Refinements in Conceptualization and Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 121-134, June.
    2. Brent Smith, 2011. "Who Shall Lead Us? How Cultural Values and Ethical Ideologies Guide Young Marketers’ Evaluations of the Transformational Manager–Leader," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(4), pages 633-645, June.
    3. Richins, Marsha L, 1991. "Social Comparison and the Idealized Images of Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(1), pages 71-83, June.
    4. Randall L. Rose & Stacy L. Wood, 2005. "Paradox and the Consumption of Authenticity through Reality Television," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 284-296, September.
    5. Murray, Keith B. & Vogel, Christine M., 1997. "Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: Financial versus nonfinancial impacts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 141-159, February.
    6. Napoli, Julie & Dickinson, Sonia J. & Beverland, Michael B. & Farrelly, Francis, 2014. "Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1090-1098.
    7. Becker-Olsen, Karen L. & Cudmore, B. Andrew & Hill, Ronald Paul, 2006. "The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 46-53, January.
    8. Richard A. Peterson, 2005. "In Search of Authenticity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5), pages 1083-1098, July.
    9. Robert E. Smith & Scott B. MacKenzie & Xiaojing Yang & Laura M. Buchholz & William K. Darley, 2007. "Modeling the Determinants and Effects of Creativity in Advertising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 819-833, 11-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lv, Xingyang & Liang, Yuqing & Luo, Jia & Liu, Yue, 2022. "Icing on the cake or gilding the lily? The impact of high-modified model images on purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Namhyun Um, 2023. "Predictors Affecting Effects of Virtual Influencer Advertising among College Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Aleena Amir & Muhammad Usman, 2024. "Understanding the Influence of Perceived Authenticity of Femvertising on Consumer Buycott Intentions: A Moderated Mediation Model of Consumers’ Extrinsic Attributions and Power Distance," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(3), pages 273-281.
    4. Namhyun Um, 2022. "Impact of Parasocial Interaction, Perceived Ad Message Authenticity, and Match-Up between Brand and Celebrity in Evaluation of Instagram Celebrity-Based Brand Endorsement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-9, March.
    5. Mendini, Monica & Peter, Paula C. & Maione, Salvatore, 2022. "The potential positive effects of time spent on Instagram on consumers’ gratitude, altruism, and willingness to donate," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 16-26.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vikas Arya & Hemraj Verma & Deepa Sethi & Rajat Agarwal, 2019. "Brand Authenticity and Brand Attachment: How Online Communities Built on Social Networking Vehicles Moderate the Consumers’ Brand Attachment," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 8(2), pages 87-103, July.
    2. Osorio, Maria Lucila & Centeno, Edgar & Cambra-Fierro, Jesus, 2023. "An empirical examination of human brand authenticity as a driver of brand love," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    3. Robert Zniva & Wolfgang J. Weitzl & Christina Lindmoser, 2023. "Be constantly different! How to manage influencer authenticity," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1485-1514, September.
    4. Gwarlann Kerviler & Nico Heuvinck & Elodie Gentina, 2022. "“Make an Effort and Show Me the Love!” Effects of Indexical and Iconic Authenticity on Perceived Brand Ethicality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 89-110, August.
    5. Dong-Woo Koo, 2018. "The Impact of Risk Perceptions of Food Ingredients on the Restaurant Industry: Focused on the Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-11, September.
    6. Julie Guidry Moulard & Randle D. Raggio & Judith Anne Garretson Folse, 2021. "Disentangling the meanings of brand authenticity: The entity-referent correspondence framework of authenticity," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 96-118, January.
    7. Susan Standing & Craig Standing, 2019. "Innovating Authentically: Cultural Differentiation in the Animation Sector," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 557-571, October.
    8. Amélie Guèvremont & Bianca Grohmann, 2018. "Does brand authenticity alleviate the effect of brand scandals?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 322-336, July.
    9. Wallach, Karen Anne & Popovich, Deidre, 2023. "When Big Is Less than Small: Why dominant brands lack authenticity in their sustainability initiatives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Davis, Robert & Sheriff, Kevin & Owen, Kim, 2019. "Conceptualising and measuring consumer authenticity online," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 17-31.
    11. Daphne Demetry, 2019. "How Organizations Claim Authenticity: The Coproduction of Illusions in Underground Restaurants," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 937-960, September.
    12. Peter H. Bloch & Omid Kamran-Disfani, 2018. "A framework for studying the impact of outdoor atmospherics in retailing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 195-213, December.
    13. Kumar, Vikas & Kaushal, Vikrant, 2021. "Perceived brand authenticity and social exclusion as drivers of psychological brand ownership," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    14. Lv, Xingyang & Liang, Yuqing & Luo, Jia & Liu, Yue, 2022. "Icing on the cake or gilding the lily? The impact of high-modified model images on purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Bodur, H. Onur & Tezer, Ali & Grohmann, Bianca, 2023. "Execution novelty: Improving brand evaluations in cause sponsorship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    16. Alhouti, Sarah & Johnson, Catherine M. & Holloway, Betsy Bugg, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility authenticity: Investigating its antecedents and outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1242-1249.
    17. Matteo Corciolani & Mariarita Santanelli, 2014. "L?effetto dell?autenticit? della marca sull?attaccamento alla marca e sul senso di distinzione sociale avvertito dai consumatori," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 37-59.
    18. Garner, Benjamin & Hollenbeck, Candice R., 2023. "The role of natural scarcity in creating impressions of authenticity at the Farmers’ market," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    19. Siiri Same, 2014. "Experience Marketing in Country Branding: Theoretical Developments and an Estonian Case Study," Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe, Tallinn School of Economics and Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, vol. 6(1).
    20. Arli, Denni & Grace, Anthony & Palmer, Janet & Pham, Cuong, 2017. "Investigating the direct and indirect effects of corporate hypocrisy and perceived corporate reputation on consumers’ attitudes toward the company," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 139-145.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:77:y:2017:i:c:p:102-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.