IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v65y2012i2p247-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying a network level in environmental impact assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Öberg, Christina
  • Huge-Brodin, Maria
  • Björklund, Maria

Abstract

Researchers and society devote increasing interest to environmental impact assessments. The study here discusses and questions current assessment models by relating them to inter-organizational network analyses, and demonstrates that single entities as the basis for environmental impact assessments may not be in the best interests of society. Three case studies focusing on logistical solutions illustrate environmental effects on a single-entity and a network level. The paper concludes that considering environmental impacts on a single-entity level disregards indirect effects, which in turn has consequences for the environment. The paper points to the importance of identifying the appropriate level for analysis of environmental impacts since the single entity as the basis for assessments may undermine environmentally friendly intentions.

Suggested Citation

  • Öberg, Christina & Huge-Brodin, Maria & Björklund, Maria, 2012. "Applying a network level in environmental impact assessments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 247-255.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:65:y:2012:i:2:p:247-255
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.05.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296311001822
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.05.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walter, Christof & Stützel, Hartmut, 2009. "A new method for assessing the sustainability of land-use systems (II): Evaluating impact indicators," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1288-1300, March.
    2. Bollen, Johannes & van der Zwaan, Bob & Brink, Corjan & Eerens, Hans, 2009. "Local air pollution and global climate change: A combined cost-benefit analysis," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 161-181, August.
    3. Munda, Giuseppe, 1996. "Cost-benefit analysis in integrated environmental assessment: some methodological issues," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 157-168, November.
    4. Pearce, David, 1998. "Cost-Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 14(4), pages 84-100, Winter.
    5. Ritter, Thomas & Gemunden, Hans Georg, 2003. "Interorganizational relationships and networks: An overview," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(9), pages 691-697, September.
    6. Sen, Amartya, 2000. "The Discipline of Cost-Benefit Analysis," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(2), pages 931-952, June.
    7. repec:bla:kyklos:v:30:y:1977:i:2:p:310-13 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Halinen, Aino & Tornroos, Jan-Ake, 2005. "Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(9), pages 1285-1297, September.
    9. Kristel Buysse & Alain Verbeke, 2003. "Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 453-470, May.
    10. David Elliott & George Yarrow, 1977. "Cost‐Benefit Analysis And Environmental Policy: A Comment," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 300-309, May.
    11. Aino Halinen & Asta Salmi & Virpi Havila, 1999. "From Dyadic Change to Changing Business Networks: An Analytical Framework," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 779-794, November.
    12. van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M., 2004. "Optimal climate policy is a utopia: from quantitative to qualitative cost-benefit analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 385-393, April.
    13. David Pearce, 1976. "The Limits Of Cost‐Benefit Analysis As A Guide To Environmental Policy," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 97-112, January.
    14. Hakansson, Hakan & Ford, David, 2002. "How should companies interact in business networks?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 133-139, February.
    15. Sen, Amartya Kumar, 2000. "The Discipline of Cost†Benefit Analysis," Scholarly Articles 3444801, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    16. Chalmers, Anna Dubois & Gadde, Lars-Erik & Hulthen, Kajsa, 2005. "Inter-organisational research in the Nordic countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(9), pages 1223-1225, September.
    17. Håkansson, Håkan & Snehota, Ivan, 1989. "No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 187-200.
    18. Harrison, Debbie & Easton, Geoff, 2002. "Patterns of actor response to environmental change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 545-552, July.
    19. Boadway, Robin W, 1974. "The Welfare Foundations of Cost-Benefit Analysis," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 84(336), pages 926-939, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kravanja, Zdravko & Čuček, Lidija, 2013. "Multi-objective optimisation for generating sustainable solutions considering total effects on the environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 67-80.
    2. Fontana, Enrico & Öberg, Christina & Poblete, León, 2021. "Nominated procurement and the indirect control of nominated sub-suppliers: Evidence from the Sri Lankan apparel supply chain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 179-192.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ojansivu, Ilkka & Laari-Salmela, Sari & Hermes, Jan, 2022. "The social impact of the Nokia-Elcoteq business relationship: Examining the consequences of legitimating relationship norms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 193-206.
    2. Valkokari, Katri, 2015. "Describing network dynamics in three different business nets," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 219-231.
    3. Oberg, Christina & Holtstrom, Johan, 2006. "Are mergers and acquisitions contagious?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(12), pages 1267-1275, November.
    4. Ritala, Paavo & Tidström, Annika, 2014. "Untangling the value-creation and value-appropriation elements of coopetition strategy: A longitudinal analysis on the firm and relational levels," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 498-515.
    5. Drummond, Conor & McGrath, Helen & O'Toole, Thomas, 2023. "Beyond the platform: Social media as a multi-faceted resource in value creation for entrepreneurial firms in a collaborative network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Osama A. Meqdadi & Thomas E. Johnsen & Rhona E. Johnsen, 2019. "Power and Diffusion of Sustainability in Supply Networks: Findings from Four In-Depth Case Studies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1089-1110, November.
    7. Mouzas, Stefanos, 2006. "Efficiency versus effectiveness in business networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(10-11), pages 1124-1132, October.
    8. Mouzas, Stefanos, 2022. "What drives business transformation? Evidence from manufacturer-retailer networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 282-293.
    9. te Boveldt, Geert & Keseru, Imre & Macharis, Cathy, 2022. "When monetarisation and ranking are not appropriate. A novel stakeholder-based appraisal method," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 192-205.
    10. Serena Galvani & Elisa Carloni & Roberta Bocconcelli & Alessandro Pagano, 2022. "From After-Sales to Advanced Services: A Network Analysis on the Impacts of Digital Servitization Evolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3848 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. S. Scrieciu & Valerie Belton & Zaid Chalabi & Reinhard Mechler & Daniel Puig, 2014. "Advancing methodological thinking and practice for development-compatible climate policy planning," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 261-288, March.
    13. Tol, Richard S.J., 2012. "A cost–benefit analysis of the EU 20/20/2020 package," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 288-295.
    14. Wojciech Czakon, 2016. "Network Strategies Logic (Logika strategii sieciowych)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 14(64), pages 17-30.
    15. Jukka Majava & Ville Isoherranen & Pekka Kess, 2013. "Business Collaboration Concepts and Implications for Companies," International Journal of Synergy and Research, ToKnowPress, vol. 2(1), pages 23-40.
    16. Piermichele La Sala & Raffaele Silvestri & Emilia Lamonaca & Nicola Faccilongo, 2017. "Le capacit? relazionali quali risorse critiche per la creazione di valore nella filiera vitivinicola lucana," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 19(3), pages 383-398.
    17. Miguel Afonso Sellitto & Guilherme Schreiber Pereira & Rafael Marques & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda, 2018. "Systemic Understanding of Coopetitive Behaviour in a Latin American Technological Park," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 479-494, October.
    18. Tol, Richard S.J., 2006. "The Polluter Pays Principle and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Climate Change: An Application of Fund," Climate Change Modelling and Policy Working Papers 12058, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    19. Ford, David & Mouzas, Stefanos, 2008. "Is there any hope? The idea of strategy in business networks," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 64-78.
    20. Nurmi, Väinö & Ahtiainen, Heini, 2018. "Distributional Weights in Environmental Valuation and Cost-benefit Analysis: Theory and Practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 217-228.
    21. Derek Linton, 2024. "The Uncertainty Problem in Cost-Benefit Analysis Expanded: A Current Review," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 6(1), pages 21-26.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:65:y:2012:i:2:p:247-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.