IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v101y2013icp67-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective optimisation for generating sustainable solutions considering total effects on the environment

Author

Listed:
  • Kravanja, Zdravko
  • Čuček, Lidija

Abstract

This contribution presents and discusses two multi-objective optimisation approaches considering total (direct and indirect) effects on the environment. Sustainability metrics, conventionally measuring direct harmful effects on the environment, are now upgraded with indirect effects in order to measure the unburdening the environment, e.g. due to the substitution of harmful with benign products. The first approach, based on a relative direct sustainability index, is now upgraded to a total sustainability index, and the second one, based on a concept of eco-cost and net profit, is extended to a recently introduced concept of eco- and total profit. These approaches are illustrated through a case study of the supply chain synthesis for producing biogas from organic and animal wastes. The results indicate that considering total effects enables obtaining more realistic solutions, than in those cases when only direct effects are considered. An appropriate trade-off between economic and environmental criteria can be established when performing a maximisation of total profit.

Suggested Citation

  • Kravanja, Zdravko & Čuček, Lidija, 2013. "Multi-objective optimisation for generating sustainable solutions considering total effects on the environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 67-80.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:101:y:2013:i:c:p:67-80
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626191200311X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanagustín Fons, M. Victoria & Fierro, José A. Moseñe & Patiño, María Gómez y, 2011. "Rural tourism: A sustainable alternative," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 551-557, February.
    2. Lior, Noam, 2012. "Sustainable energy development (May 2011) with some game-changers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 3-18.
    3. Čuček, Lidija & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Kravanja, Zdravko, 2012. "Total footprints-based multi-criteria optimisation of regional biomass energy supply chains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 135-145.
    4. Rubio Rodríguez, M.A. & Ruyck, J. De & Díaz, P. Roque & Verma, V.K. & Bram, S., 2011. "An LCA based indicator for evaluation of alternative energy routes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 630-635, March.
    5. Mohseni, Farzad & Magnusson, Mimmi & Görling, Martin & Alvfors, Per, 2012. "Biogas from renewable electricity – Increasing a climate neutral fuel supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 11-16.
    6. Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B. & Barilea, Ivan U. & Culaba, Alvin B. & Cruz, Jose B., 2012. "A fuzzy multi-regional input–output optimization model for biomass production and trade under resource and footprint constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 154-160.
    7. Öberg, Christina & Huge-Brodin, Maria & Björklund, Maria, 2012. "Applying a network level in environmental impact assessments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 247-255.
    8. Ren, Hongbo & Zhou, Weisheng & Nakagami, Ken'ichi & Gao, Weijun & Wu, Qiong, 2010. "Multi-objective optimization for the operation of distributed energy systems considering economic and environmental aspects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(12), pages 3642-3651, December.
    9. Kissinger, Meidad & Gottlieb, Dan, 2010. "Place oriented ecological footprint analysis -- The case of Israel's grain supply," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1639-1645, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Xiaojian & Luo, Xianglong & Chen, Jianyong & Yang, Zhi & Chen, Ying & María Ponce-Ortega, José & El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M., 2018. "Synthesis and dual-objective optimization of industrial combined heat and power plants compromising the water–energy nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 448-468.
    2. Tao Lian & Changhao Li, 2024. "Linking Environmental Sustainability and Financial Resilience through the Environmental Footprints and Their Determinants: A Panel Data Approach for G7 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Kiraly, Annamaria & Pahor, Bojan & Kravanja, Zdravko, 2013. "Achieving energy self-sufficiency by integrating renewables into companies' supply networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 46-57.
    4. Bieber, Niclas & Ker, Jen Ho & Wang, Xiaonan & Triantafyllidis, Charalampos & van Dam, Koen H. & Koppelaar, Rembrandt H.E.M. & Shah, Nilay, 2018. "Sustainable planning of the energy-water-food nexus using decision making tools," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 584-607.
    5. Thies, Christian & Kieckhäfer, Karsten & Spengler, Thomas S. & Sodhi, Manbir S., 2019. "Operations research for sustainability assessment of products: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 1-21.
    6. Priya, G.S. Krishna & Bandyopadhyay, Santanu, 2017. "Multiple objectives Pinch Analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 128-141.
    7. Aleksander Banasik & Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard & Argyris Kanellopoulos & G. D. H. Claassen & Jack G. A. J. Vorst, 2018. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 366-396, September.
    8. Anissa Frini & Sarah Benamor, 2018. "Making Decisions in a Sustainable Development Context: A State-of-the-Art Survey and Proposal of a Multi-period Single Synthesizing Criterion Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 52(2), pages 341-385, August.
    9. Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & da Silva, Cátia & Carvalho, Ana, 2018. "Opportunities and challenges in sustainable supply chain: An operations research perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 399-431.
    10. Sun, Li & Gai, Limei & Smith, Robin, 2017. "Site utility system optimization with operation adjustment under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 450-456.
    11. Maryori C. Díaz-Ramírez & Víctor J. Ferreira & Tatiana García-Armingol & Ana María López-Sabirón & Germán Ferreira, 2020. "Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Dragan Pamučar & Ibrahim Badi & Korica Sanja & Radojko Obradović, 2018. "A Novel Approach for the Selection of Power-Generation Technology Using a Linguistic Neutrosophic CODAS Method: A Case Study in Libya," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-25, September.
    13. Lekavičius, Vidas & Galinis, Arvydas & Miškinis, Vaclovas, 2019. "Long-term economic impacts of energy development scenarios: The role of domestic electricity generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Eguaras-Martínez, María & Vidaurre-Arbizu, Marina & Martín-Gómez, César, 2014. "Simulation and evaluation of Building Information Modeling in a real pilot site," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 475-484.
    15. Tuni, Andrea & Rentizelas, Athanasios, 2019. "An innovative eco-intensity based method for assessing extended supply chain environmental sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 126-142.
    16. Bedoić, Robert & Dorotić, Hrvoje & Schneider, Daniel Rolph & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2021. "Synergy between feedstock gate fee and power-to-gas: An energy and economic analysis of renewable methane production in a biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 12-23.
    17. Vicente, Filipa A. & Hren, Robert & Novak, Uroš & Čuček, Lidija & Likozar, Blaž & Vujanović, Annamaria, 2024. "Energy demand distribution and environmental impact assessment of chitosan production from shrimp shells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    18. Yuanfeng Wang & Bo Pang & Xiangjie Zhang & Jingjing Wang & Yinshan Liu & Chengcheng Shi & Shuowen Zhou, 2020. "Life Cycle Environmental Costs of Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Luo, Xianglong & Hu, Jiahao & Zhao, Jun & Zhang, Bingjian & Chen, Ying & Mo, Songping, 2014. "Multi-objective optimization for the design and synthesis of utility systems with emission abatement technology concerns," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1110-1131.
    20. Chen, C. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H., 2016. "Interval-fuzzy municipal-scale energy model for identification of optimal strategies for energy management – A case study of Tianjin, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1161-1177.
    21. Francesco Calise & Mário Costa & Qiuwang Wang & Xiliang Zhang & Neven Duić, 2018. "Recent Advances in the Analysis of Sustainable Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-30, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ba, Birome Holo & Prins, Christian & Prodhon, Caroline, 2016. "Models for optimization and performance evaluation of biomass supply chains: An Operations Research perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P2), pages 977-989.
    2. Tonini, Davide & Astrup, Thomas, 2012. "LCA of biomass-based energy systems: A case study for Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 234-246.
    3. Dong, Jun & Chi, Yong & Zou, Daoan & Fu, Chao & Huang, Qunxing & Ni, Mingjiang, 2014. "Energy–environment–economy assessment of waste management systems from a life cycle perspective: Model development and case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 400-408.
    4. Lim, Chun Hsion & Lam, Hon Loong & Ng, Wendy Pei Qin, 2018. "A novel HAZOP approach for literature review on biomass supply chain optimisation model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 13-25.
    5. Duarte, Alexandra & Sarache, William & Costa, Yasel, 2016. "Biofuel supply chain design from Coffee Cut Stem under environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 321-331.
    6. Jiaxin Lu & Weijun Wang & Yingchao Zhang & Song Cheng, 2017. "Multi-Objective Optimal Design of Stand-Alone Hybrid Energy System Using Entropy Weight Method Based on HOMER," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    7. He, Peijun & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2019. "Energy-economic resilience with multi-region input–output linear programming models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Da Li & Shijie Zhang & Yunhan Xiao, 2020. "Interval Optimization-Based Optimal Design of Distributed Energy Resource Systems under Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Piotr Kulyk & Agnieszka Brelik, 2019. "Tourist Competitiveness of Polish Rural Areas," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 379-387.
    10. Fonseca, Juan D. & Commenge, Jean-Marc & Camargo, Mauricio & Falk, Laurent & Gil, Iván D., 2021. "Sustainability analysis for the design of distributed energy systems: A multi-objective optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    11. Yanfeng Liu & Yaxing Wang & Xi Luo, 2020. "Design and Operation Optimization of Distributed Solar Energy System Based on Dynamic Operation Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, December.
    12. Sousa, Tiago & Morais, Hugo & Soares, João & Vale, Zita, 2012. "Day-ahead resource scheduling in smart grids considering Vehicle-to-Grid and network constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 183-193.
    13. Chen, Yen-Haw & Lu, Su-Ying & Chang, Yung-Ruei & Lee, Ta-Tung & Hu, Ming-Che, 2013. "Economic analysis and optimal energy management models for microgrid systems: A case study in Taiwan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 145-154.
    14. Keon Baek & Woong Ko & Jinho Kim, 2019. "Optimal Scheduling of Distributed Energy Resources in Residential Building under the Demand Response Commitment Contract," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Toka, Agorasti & Iakovou, Eleftherios & Vlachos, Dimitrios & Tsolakis, Naoum & Grigoriadou, Anastasia-Loukia, 2014. "Managing the diffusion of biomass in the residential energy sector: An illustrative real-world case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 56-69.
    16. Xue, Jian & Guo, Na & Zhao, Laijun & Zhu, Di & Ji, Xiaoqin, 2020. "A cooperative inter-provincial model for energy conservation based on futures trading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    17. Najafi, Arsalan & Falaghi, Hamid & Contreras, Javier & Ramezani, Maryam, 2016. "Medium-term energy hub management subject to electricity price and wind uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 418-433.
    18. Han, S.-H. & Cho, D.H. & Kim, Y.H. & Shin, S.-J., 2013. "Biobutanol production from 2-year-old willow biomass by acid hydrolysis and acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 13-17.
    19. Cambero, Claudia & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2014. "Assessment and optimization of forest biomass supply chains from economic, social and environmental perspectives – A review of literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 62-73.
    20. Segurado, R. & Madeira, J.F.A. & Costa, M. & Duić, N. & Carvalho, M.G., 2016. "Optimization of a wind powered desalination and pumped hydro storage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 487-499.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:101:y:2013:i:c:p:67-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.