IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v185y2024ics014829632400403x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

First impressions vs. The Peak-End Rule: Episodic evaluations in a service experience and the moderating effect of retrospective delay

Author

Listed:
  • McCullough, Heath
  • Padgett, Daniel
  • Han, Sumin
  • Lee, Kang
  • Martin, David S.
  • Bourdeau, Brian L.

Abstract

This article integrates prior research on episodic evaluations with the service experience literature to investigate the impact of multiple interactions with frontline employees on customer evaluations of the employees and overall satisfaction with the service experience. A field study was constructed of customer interactions with hotel staff, including over 5,000 customer stays across a 5-year period. The results reveal that key moments, specifically the first impression, peak impressions, and last impressions, significantly impact satisfaction with the overall hotel stay. Moreover, we also introduce a new construct, retrospective delay, which is the time lapse between the actual service experience and the evaluation of the experience. In doing so, unlike prior research indicating the robustness of the peak-end rule, our results find that first impressions are the most important contributor to frontline employee evaluations and overall satisfaction. Furthermore, we find that first impressions become more critical as retrospective delay increases. Our results suggest that first impressions not only impact frontline employee evaluations and satisfaction with the service encounter, but that measurement timing could explain some conflicting findings in the services literature regarding the efficacy of positive starts.

Suggested Citation

  • McCullough, Heath & Padgett, Daniel & Han, Sumin & Lee, Kang & Martin, David S. & Bourdeau, Brian L., 2024. "First impressions vs. The Peak-End Rule: Episodic evaluations in a service experience and the moderating effect of retrospective delay," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s014829632400403x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632400403X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s014829632400403x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.