IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v117y2020icp357-367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Not all that glitters is golden: The impact of procedural fairness perceptions on firm evaluations and customer satisfaction with favorable outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Mathur, Pragya
  • Sarin Jain, Shalini

Abstract

Firms often strive to delight their customers and build strong customer-firm relationships by providing favored benefits to their customers. Drawing from the organizational justice literature, we show that even when customers receive favorable outcomes from distributively fair firm actions, considerations of procedural unfairness may adversely affect their firm evaluations. Procedural fairness salience and customers’ perceived relationship with the firm determine the extent to which procedural fairness affects firm-evaluations. Customers in communal relationships, focused on social/relational factors, are more sensitive to procedural fairness, leading to improved (diminished) firm evaluations when the procedure is perceived as fair (unfair). Those in exchange relationships are unaffected by procedural fairness and evaluate the firm based largely on outcome favorability. Firm trustworthiness mediates the impact of procedural fairness on evaluations. Implications of procedural fairness being driven by relational and non-instrumental considerations are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathur, Pragya & Sarin Jain, Shalini, 2020. "Not all that glitters is golden: The impact of procedural fairness perceptions on firm evaluations and customer satisfaction with favorable outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 357-367.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:117:y:2020:i:c:p:357-367
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296320303702
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Jessie J. & Lalwani, Ashok K., 2019. "The distinct influence of power distance perception and power distance values on customer satisfaction in response to loyalty programs," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 580-596.
    2. Skarmeas, Dionysis & Leonidou, Constantinos N., 2013. "When consumers doubt, Watch out! The role of CSR skepticism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1831-1838.
    3. Sujay Dutta & Abhijit Guha & Abhijit Biswas & Dhruv Grewal, 2019. "Can attempts to delight customers with surprise gains boomerang? A test using low-price guarantees," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 417-437, May.
    4. Perks, Keith J. & Farache, Francisca & Shukla, Paurav & Berry, Aidan, 2013. "Communicating responsibility-practicing irresponsibility in CSR advertisements," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1881-1888.
    5. Adam Nguyen & Juan Meng, 2013. "Whether and to What Extent Consumers Demand Fair Pricing Behavior for Its Own Sake," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 529-547, May.
    6. Noel Siu & Tracy Zhang & Cheuk-Ying Yau, 2013. "The Roles of Justice and Customer Satisfaction in Customer Retention: A Lesson from Service Recovery," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(4), pages 675-686, June.
    7. Aïda Mimouni Chaabane & Béatrice Parguel, 2016. "The double-edge effect of retailers’ cause-related marketing: When scepticism cools the warm-glow effect," Post-Print hal-01375407, HAL.
    8. Bolton, Lisa E & Warlop, Luk & Alba, Joseph W, 2003. "Consumer Perceptions of Price (Un)Fairness," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(4), pages 474-491, March.
    9. Ashworth, Laurence & McShane, Lindsay, 2012. "Why Do We Care What Others Pay? The Effect of Other Consumers’ Prices on Inferences of Seller (Dis)Respect and Perceptions of Deservingness Violation," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 145-155.
    10. Orth, Ulrich R. & Bouzdine-Chameeva, Tatiana & Brand, Kathrin, 2013. "Trust during retail encounters: A touchy proposition," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 301-314.
    11. Simona Romani & Silvia Grappi & Richard Bagozzi, 2013. "Explaining Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Gratitude and Altruistic Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 193-206, May.
    12. Jodie Ferguson & Pam Ellen & William Bearden, 2014. "Procedural and Distributive Fairness: Determinants of Overall Price Fairness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 217-231, May.
    13. Chen, Tong & Ma, Ke & Bian, Xuemei & Zheng, Chundong & Devlin, James, 2018. "Is high recovery more effective than expected recovery in addressing service failure? — A moral judgment perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-9.
    14. Jain, Shalini Sarin & Jain, Shailendra Pratap, 2018. "Power distance belief and preference for transparency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 135-142.
    15. Fournier, Susan, 1998. "Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(4), pages 343-373, March.
    16. Sarkar Sengupta, Aditi & Balaji, M.S. & Krishnan, Balaji C., 2015. "How customers cope with service failure? A study of brand reputation and customer satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 665-674.
    17. Goodwin, Cathy & Ross, Ivan, 1992. "Consumer responses to service failures: Influence of procedural and interactional fairness perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 149-163, September.
    18. Sora Kim, 2019. "The Process Model of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Communication: CSR Communication and its Relationship with Consumers’ CSR Knowledge, Trust, and Corporate Reputation Perception," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 1143-1159, February.
    19. Mittal, Vikas & Huppertz, John W. & Khare, Adwait, 2008. "Customer complaining: The role of tie strength and information control," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 195-204.
    20. Hazée, Simon & Van Vaerenbergh, Yves & Armirotto, Vincent, 2017. "Co-creating service recovery after service failure: The role of brand equity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 101-109.
    21. Mathur, Pragya & Jain, Shailendra Pratap & Hsieh, Meng-Hua & Lindsey, Charles D. & Maheswaran, Durairaj, 2013. "The influence of implicit theories and message frame on the persuasiveness of disease prevention and detection advocacies," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 141-151.
    22. Jiyun Kang & Gwendolyn Hustvedt, 2014. "Building Trust Between Consumers and Corporations: The Role of Consumer Perceptions of Transparency and Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 253-265, December.
    23. Sparks, Beverley A. & McColl-Kennedy, Janet R., 2001. "Justice strategy options for increased customer satisfaction in a services recovery setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 209-218, December.
    24. Brockner, Joel & Heuer, Larry & Magner, Nace & Folger, Robert & Umphress, Elizabeth & van den Bos, Kees & Vermunt, Riel & Magner, Mary & Siegel, Phyllis, 2003. "High procedural fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations: An attributional analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 51-68, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lily Morse & Mike Horia M. Teodorescu & Yazeed Awwad & Gerald C. Kane, 2022. "Do the Ends Justify the Means? Variation in the Distributive and Procedural Fairness of Machine Learning Algorithms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(4), pages 1083-1095, December.
    2. Hornik, Jacob & Rachamim, Matti, 2023. "Justice for all: A marketing perspective and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Xiaoyu Wang & Guangming Li & Rongmei Jiang, 2023. "Research on Purchase Intention of E-Commerce Poverty Alleviation Products Based on Perceived Justice Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Sen, Argha & Kumar, Alok & Dubey, Vivek & Gupta, Aditya, 2023. "Managing two-sided B2B electronic markets: Governance mechanisms, performance implications, and boundary conditions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Yucel-Aybat, Ozge & Hsieh, Meng-Hua, 2021. "Consumer mindsets matter: Benefit framing and firm–cause fit in the persuasiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 418-427.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yucel-Aybat, Ozge & Hsieh, Meng-Hua, 2021. "Consumer mindsets matter: Benefit framing and firm–cause fit in the persuasiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 418-427.
    2. Shuyue Huang & Lena Jingen Liang & Hwansuk Chris Choi, 2022. "How We Failed in Context: A Text-Mining Approach to Understanding Hotel Service Failures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Cambier, Fanny & Poncin, Ingrid, 2020. "Inferring brand integrity from marketing communications: The effects of brand transparency signals in a consumer empowerment context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 260-270.
    4. Viglia, Giampaolo & Abrate, Graziano, 2014. "How social comparison influences reference price formation in a service context," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 168-180.
    5. Oznur Ozkan Tektas, 2017. "Perceived justice and post-recovery satisfaction in banking service failures: Do commitment types matter?," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(4), pages 851-870, December.
    6. White, Allyn & Breazeale, Michael & Collier, Joel E., 2012. "The Effects of Perceived Fairness on Customer Responses to Retailer SST Push Policies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 250-261.
    7. Kanupriya Katyal & Vinay Kanetkar & Sanjay Patro, 2019. "What is a fair fare? Exploring the differences between perceived price fairness and perceived price unfairness," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 133-146, April.
    8. Ma, Ruijing & Wang, Weisha, 2021. "Smile or pity? Examine the impact of emoticon valence on customer satisfaction and purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 443-456.
    9. Mantovani, Danielle & de Andrade, Lucas Magalhães & Negrão, Angela, 2017. "How motivations for CSR and consumer-brand social distance influence consumers to adopt pro-social behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 156-163.
    10. Sansome, Kate & Wilkie, Dean & Conduit, Jodie, 2024. "Beyond information availability: Specifying the dimensions of consumer perceived brand transparency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    11. Riquelme, Isabel P. & Román, Sergio & Cuestas, Pedro J. & Iacobucci, Dawn, 2019. "The Dark Side of Good Reputation and Loyalty in Online Retailing: When Trust Leads to Retaliation through Price Unfairness," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 35-52.
    12. Azemi, Yllka & Ozuem, Wilson & Howell, Kerry E. & Lancaster, Geoff, 2019. "An exploration into the practice of online service failure and recovery strategies in the Balkans," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 420-431.
    13. Janssen, Catherine & Swaen, Valérie & Du, Shuili, 2022. "Is a specific claim always better? The double-edged effects of claim specificity in green advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 435-447.
    14. Floritzel Moreno & Jiyun Kang, 2020. "How to alleviate consumer skepticism concerning corporate responsibility: The role of content and delivery in CSR communications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2477-2490, November.
    15. Joseph Lok-Man Lee & Calvin Wah-On Cheng & Vanessa Shun-Wah Liu, 2022. "Core Chinese cultural values: Perceived justice and post-recovery satisfaction in higher education services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(3), pages 743-770, September.
    16. Pade, Robin & Feurer, Sven, 2022. "The mitigating role of nostalgia for consumer price unfairness perceptions in response to disadvantageous personalized pricing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 277-287.
    17. Ferguson, Jodie L. & Brown, Brian P. & Johnston, Wesley J., 2017. "Partitioned pricing, price fairness perceptions, and the moderating effects of brand relationships in SME business markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 80-92.
    18. Fennell, Patrick B. & Coleman, Joshua T. & Kuo, Andrew, 2020. "The moderating role of donation quantifiers on price fairness judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 464-473.
    19. Jorge Matute‐Vallejo & Rafael Bravo & José M. Pina, 2011. "The influence of corporate social responsibility and price fairness on customer behaviour: evidence from the financial sector," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 317-331, November.
    20. Anran Zhang & Alex Scodellaro & Bo Pang & Hui-Yi Lo & Zhengliang Xu, 2020. "Attribution and Effectiveness of Cause-Related Marketing: The Interplay between Cause–Brand Fit and Corporate Reputation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:117:y:2020:i:c:p:357-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.