IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v73y2019icp30-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The openness-fluid-crystallized-intelligence (OFCI) model and the environmental enrichment hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Trapp, Stefanie
  • Blömeke, Sigrid
  • Ziegler, Matthias

Abstract

The Openness-Fluid-Crystallized-Intelligence (OFCI) model describes how these different constructs interact over time. One fundamental element in the model is the Environmental Enrichment Hypothesis, which states that more Openness leads to more learning opportunities, thereby fostering fluid intelligence (Gf). Indirectly, this positive influence also has a positive effect on crystallized intelligence (Gc). Despite empirical evidence supporting the model as a whole, little is known with regard to the actual mechanisms underlying environmental enrichment. PIAAC (Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies) data (N = 5465) were used to explore possible behavioral differences that lead to enriched environments for more open people. To this end, we utilized different indicators of reading and calculating behavior. The indicator of Openness used was indeed found to be associated with differences in reading and calculating activities at work and during leisure time. These relations were also shown to be related to the indicator of Gf and indirectly to the indicator of Gc. Theoretical implications and limitations of the study are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Trapp, Stefanie & Blömeke, Sigrid & Ziegler, Matthias, 2019. "The openness-fluid-crystallized-intelligence (OFCI) model and the environmental enrichment hypothesis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 30-40.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:73:y:2019:i:c:p:30-40
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2019.01.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618301946
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2019.01.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lang, Frieder R. & John, Dennis & Lüdtke, Oliver & Schupp, Jürgen & Wagner, Gert G., 2011. "Short Assessment of the Big Five: Robust Across Survey Methods Except Telephone Interviewing," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 43(2), pages 548-567.
    2. PIAAC Expert Group in Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments, 2009. "PIAAC Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments: A Conceptual Framework," OECD Education Working Papers 36, OECD Publishing.
    3. Monnier, Moana, 2015. "Difficulties in Defining Social-Emotional Intelligence, Competences and Skills - a Theoretical Analysis and Structural Suggestion," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 2(1), pages 59-84.
    4. PIAAC Numeracy Expert Group, 2009. "PIAAC Numeracy: A Conceptual Framework," OECD Education Working Papers 35, OECD Publishing.
    5. PIAAC Literacy Expert Group, 2009. "PIAAC Literacy: A Conceptual Framework," OECD Education Working Papers 34, OECD Publishing.
    6. Jule Specht & Boris Egloff & Stefan C. Schmukle, 2011. "Stability and Change of Personality across the Life Course: The Impact of Age and Major Life Events on Mean-Level and Rank-Order Stability of the Big Five," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 377, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rusche, Marianna Massimilla & Ziegler, Matthias, 2022. "The interplay between domain-specific knowledge and selected investment traits across the life span," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Rozgonjuk, Dmitri & Schmitz, Florian & Kannen, Christopher & Montag, Christian, 2021. "Cognitive ability and personality: Testing broad to nuanced associations with a smartphone app," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beatrice Rammstedt & Frank M. Spinath & David Richter & Jürgen Schupp, 2013. "Personality Changes in Couples: Partnership Longevity and Personality Congruence in Couples," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 585, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    2. Hille, Adrian & Schupp, Jürgen, 2015. "How Learning a Musical Instrument Affects the Development of Skills," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 44, pages 56-82.
    3. Cabane, Charlotte & Hille, Adrian & Lechner, Michael, 2016. "Mozart or Pelé? The effects of adolescents' participation in music and sports," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 90-103.
    4. Cabane, Charlotte & Hille, Adrian & Lechner, Michael, 2015. "Mozart or Pelé? The effects of teenagers’ participation in music and sports," Economics Working Paper Series 1509, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    5. Laura Schräpler & Jörg-Peter Schräpler & Gert G. Wagner, 2019. "Wie (in)stabil ist die Lebenszufriedenheit? Eine Sequenzanalyse mit Daten des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (SOEP)," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1045, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    6. Eva Asselmann & Jule Specht, 2019. "Till Death Do Us Part: Transactions between Losing One’s Spouse and the Big Five Personality Traits," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1063, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    7. Julia M. Rohrer & Boris Egloff & Stefan C. Schmukle, 2015. "Examining the Effects of Birth Order on Personality," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 807, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    8. Richter, David & Körtner, John L. & Saßenroth, Denise, 2014. "Personality Has Minor Effects on Panel Attrition," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 53, pages 31-35.
    9. Eva Asselmann & Elke Holst & Jule Specht, 2022. "Longitudinal Bidirectional Associations between Personality and Becoming a Leader," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1167, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    10. Rammstedt, Beatrice & Spinath, Frank M. & Richter, David & Schupp, Jürgen, 2013. "Partnership Longevity and Personality Congruence in Couples," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 54(7), pages 832-835.
    11. Till Kaiser, 2012. "Haben gebildetere Mütter gewissenhaftere Kinder?: Soziale Herkunft und Persönlichkeitsentwicklung im frühkindlichen Alter," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 509, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    12. Petrik Runst & Jörg Thomä, 2023. "Resilient entrepreneurs? — revisiting the relationship between the Big Five and self-employment," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 417-443, June.
    13. Jelena Bagnjuk & Hans-Helmut König & André Hajek, 2019. "Personality Traits and Obesity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-13, July.
    14. Lechner, Michael & Hille, Adrian & Cabane, Charlotte, 2015. "Mozart or Pelé? The effects of teenagers? participation in music and sports," CEPR Discussion Papers 10556, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Eva Asselmann & Jule Specht, 2020. "Testing the Social Investment Principle around Childbirth: Little Evidence for Personality Maturation before and after Becoming a Parent," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1082, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    16. Fabian Kosse & Thomas Deckers & Pia Pinger & Hannah Schildberg-Hörisch & Armin Falk, 2020. "The Formation of Prosociality: Causal Evidence on the Role of Social Environment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(2), pages 434-467.
    17. Georges Steffgen & Philipp E. Sischka & Martha Fernandez de Henestrosa, 2020. "The Quality of Work Index and the Quality of Employment Index: A Multidimensional Approach of Job Quality and Its Links to Well-Being at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-31, October.
    18. Shelly Lundberg, 2013. "The College Type: Personality and Educational Inequality," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(3), pages 421-441.
    19. Esteban García-Miralles & Miriam Gensowski, 2020. "Are Children's Socio-Emotional Skills Shaped by Parental Health Shocks?," CEBI working paper series 20-21, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    20. Borau, Sylvie & Couprie, Hélène & Hopfensitz, Astrid, 2022. "The prosociality of married people: Evidence from a large multinational sample," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Openness; Reading; Calculating; Gf; Gc;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:73:y:2019:i:c:p:30-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.