IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v52y2013i3p522-531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the (in-)dependence between financial and actuarial risks

Author

Listed:
  • Dhaene, Jan
  • Kukush, Alexander
  • Luciano, Elisa
  • Schoutens, Wim
  • Stassen, Ben

Abstract

Probability statements about future evolutions of financial and actuarial risks are expressed in terms of the ‘real-world’ probability measure P, whereas in an arbitrage-free environment, the prices of these traded risks can be expressed in terms of an equivalent martingale measure Q. The assumption of independence between financial and actuarial risks in the real world may be quite reasonable in many situations. Making such an independence assumption in the pricing world however, may be convenient but hard to understand from an intuitive point of view. In this pedagogical paper, we investigate the conditions under which it is possible (or not) to transfer the independence assumption from P to Q. In particular, we show that an independence relation that is observed in the P-world can often not be maintained in the Q-world.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhaene, Jan & Kukush, Alexander & Luciano, Elisa & Schoutens, Wim & Stassen, Ben, 2013. "On the (in-)dependence between financial and actuarial risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 522-531.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:52:y:2013:i:3:p:522-531
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.03.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668713000413
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.03.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dhaene, J. & Denuit, M. & Goovaerts, M. J. & Kaas, R. & Vyncke, D., 2002. "The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 3-33, August.
    2. Dhaene, J. & Denuit, M. & Goovaerts, M. J. & Kaas, R. & Vyncke, D., 2002. "The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 133-161, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. An Chen & Thai Nguyen & Thorsten Sehner, 2022. "Unit-Linked Tontine: Utility-Based Design, Pricing and Performance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.
    2. Anne MacKay & Maciej Augustyniak & Carole Bernard & Mary R. Hardy, 2017. "Risk Management of Policyholder Behavior in Equity-Linked Life Insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 84(2), pages 661-690, June.
    3. Christian Biener & Martin Eling & Shailee Pradhan, 2015. "Recent Research Developments Affecting Nonlife Insurance—The CAS Risk Premium Project 2013 Update," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 18(1), pages 129-141, March.
    4. Ballotta, Laura & Eberlein, Ernst & Schmidt, Thorsten & Zeineddine, Raghid, 2021. "Fourier based methods for the management of complex life insurance products," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 320-341.
    5. Jevtić, Petar & Regis, Luca, 2015. "Assessing the solvency of insurance portfolios via a continuous-time cohort model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 36-47.
    6. Dhaene, Jan & Stassen, Ben & Devolder, Pierre & Vellekoop, Michel, 2014. "The Minimal Entropy Martingale Measure in a market of traded financial and actuarial risks," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2014055, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    7. Luciano, Elisa & Regis, Luca, 2014. "Efficient versus inefficient hedging strategies in the presence of financial and longevity (value at) risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 68-77.
    8. Tahir Choulli & Catherine Daveloose & Mich`ele Vanmaele, 2018. "Mortality/longevity Risk-Minimization with or without securitization," Papers 1805.11844, arXiv.org.
    9. Tahir Choulli & Catherine Daveloose & Michèle Vanmaele, 2021. "Mortality/Longevity Risk-Minimization with or without Securitization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-27, July.
    10. Chen, An & Hentschel, Felix & Klein, Jakob K., 2015. "A utility- and CPT-based comparison of life insurance contracts with guarantees," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 327-339.
    11. Huang, Yiming & Mamon, Rogemar & Xiong, Heng, 2022. "Valuing guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits by a change of numéraire approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-26.
    12. Bahl, Raj Kumari & Sabanis, Sotirios, 2021. "Model-independent price bounds for Catastrophic Mortality Bonds," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 276-291.
    13. Raj Kumari Bahl & Sotirios Sabanis, 2017. "General Price Bounds for Guaranteed Annuity Options," Papers 1707.00807, arXiv.org.
    14. Deelstra, Griselda & Grasselli, Martino & Van Weverberg, Christopher, 2016. "The role of the dependence between mortality and interest rates when pricing Guaranteed Annuity Options," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 205-219.
    15. Fontana, Claudio & Rotondi, Francesco, 2023. "Valuation of general GMWB annuities in a low interest rate environment," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 142-167.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimitrios G. Konstantinides & Georgios C. Zachos, 2019. "Exhibiting Abnormal Returns Under a Risk Averse Strategy," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 551-566, June.
    2. Zheng, Yanting & Yang, Jingping & Huang, Jianhua Z., 2011. "Approximation of bivariate copulas by patched bivariate Fréchet copulas," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 246-256, March.
    3. Said Khalil, 2022. "Expectile-based capital allocation," Working Papers hal-03816525, HAL.
    4. Denuit, Michel & Hieber, Peter & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "Mortality credits within large survivor funds," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021038, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    5. Nam, Hee Seok & Tang, Qihe & Yang, Fan, 2011. "Characterization of upper comonotonicity via tail convex order," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 368-373, May.
    6. Kaas, Rob & Tang, Qihe, 2005. "A large deviation result for aggregate claims with dependent claim occurrences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 251-259, June.
    7. Wenjun Jiang & Jiandong Ren & Ričardas Zitikis, 2017. "Optimal Reinsurance Policies under the VaR Risk Measure When the Interests of Both the Cedent and the Reinsurer Are Taken into Account," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, February.
    8. He, Junnan & Tang, Qihe & Zhang, Huan, 2016. "Risk reducers in convex order," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 80-88.
    9. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Badescu, Alexandru M. & Cheung, Ka Chun, 2013. "Optimal reinsurance in the presence of counterparty default risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 690-697.
    10. Raj Kumari Bahl & Sotirios Sabanis, 2017. "General Price Bounds for Guaranteed Annuity Options," Papers 1707.00807, arXiv.org.
    11. Bahareh Afhami & Mohsen Rezapour & Mohsen Madadi & Vahed Maroufy, 2021. "Dynamic investment portfolio optimization using a Multivariate Merton Model with Correlated Jump Risk," Papers 2104.11594, arXiv.org.
    12. Brückner, Karsten, 2008. "Quantifying the error of convex order bounds for truncated first moments," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 261-270, February.
    13. Sinem Bas & Philippe Bich & Alain Chateauneuf, 2021. "Multidimensional inequalities and generalized quantile functions," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(2), pages 375-409, March.
    14. Lemmens, D. & Liang, L.Z.J. & Tempere, J. & De Schepper, A., 2010. "Pricing bounds for discrete arithmetic Asian options under Lévy models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(22), pages 5193-5207.
    15. Yang, Jingping & Qi, Yongcheng & Wang, Ruodu, 2009. "A class of multivariate copulas with bivariate Frechet marginal copulas," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 139-147, August.
    16. Laeven, Roger J.A., 2009. "Worst VaR scenarios: A remark," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 159-163, April.
    17. Van Weert, Koen & Dhaene, Jan & Goovaerts, Marc, 2010. "Optimal portfolio selection for general provisioning and terminal wealth problems," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 90-97, August.
    18. Annaert, Jan & Deelstra, Griselda & Heyman, Dries & Vanmaele, Michèle, 2007. "Risk management of a bond portfolio using options," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 299-316, November.
    19. Antonella Campana & Paola Ferretti, 2005. "Distortion Risk Measures and Discrete Risks," Game Theory and Information 0510013, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Alain Chateauneuf & Mina Mostoufi & David Vyncke, 2015. "Comonotonic Monte Carlo and its applications in option pricing and quantification of risk," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 15015, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:52:y:2013:i:3:p:522-531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.