IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v114y2024icp108-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian CART models for insurance claims frequency

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yaojun
  • Ji, Lanpeng
  • Aivaliotis, Georgios
  • Taylor, Charles

Abstract

The accuracy and interpretability of a (non-life) insurance pricing model are essential qualities to ensure fair and transparent premiums for policy-holders, that reflect their risk. In recent years, classification and regression trees (CARTs) and their ensembles have gained popularity in the actuarial literature, since they offer good prediction performance and are relatively easy to interpret. In this paper, we introduce Bayesian CART models for insurance pricing, with a particular focus on claims frequency modelling. In addition to the common Poisson and negative binomial (NB) distributions used for claims frequency, we implement Bayesian CART for the zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) distribution to address the difficulty arising from the imbalanced insurance claims data. To this end, we introduce a general MCMC algorithm using data augmentation methods for posterior tree exploration. We also introduce the deviance information criterion (DIC) for tree model selection. The proposed models are able to identify trees which can better classify the policy-holders into risk groups. Simulations and real insurance data will be used to illustrate the applicability of these models.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yaojun & Ji, Lanpeng & Aivaliotis, Georgios & Taylor, Charles, 2024. "Bayesian CART models for insurance claims frequency," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 108-131.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:114:y:2024:i:c:p:108-131
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2023.11.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668723000999
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2023.11.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Denuit & Arthur Charpentier & Julien Trufin, 2021. "Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for Insurance Pricing with Machine Learning," Papers 2103.03635, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    2. Denuit, Michel & Charpentier, Arthur & Trufin, Julien, 2021. "Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for insurance pricing with machine learning," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 485-497.
    3. Antonio R. Linero & Debajyoti Sinha & Stuart R. Lipsitz, 2020. "Semiparametric mixed‐scale models using shared Bayesian forests," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(1), pages 131-144, March.
    4. Denuit, Michel & Charpentier , Arthur & Trufin, Julien, 2021. "Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for insurance pricing with machine learning," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2021049, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    5. Hu, Changyue & Quan, Zhiyu & Chong, Wing Fung, 2022. "Imbalanced learning for insurance using modified loss functions in tree-based models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 13-32.
    6. Roel Henckaerts & Katrien Antonio & Maxime Clijsters & Roel Verbelen, 2018. "A data driven binning strategy for the construction of insurance tariff classes," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2018(8), pages 681-705, September.
    7. Yi Liu & Veronika Ročková & Yuexi Wang, 2021. "Variable selection with ABC Bayesian forests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(3), pages 453-481, July.
    8. Roel Henckaerts & Marie-Pier Côté & Katrien Antonio & Roel Verbelen, 2021. "Boosting Insights in Insurance Tariff Plans with Tree-Based Machine Learning Methods," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 255-285, April.
    9. Jared S. Murray, 2021. "Log-Linear Bayesian Additive Regression Trees for Multinomial Logistic and Count Regression Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(534), pages 756-769, April.
    10. Christopher Blier-Wong & Hélène Cossette & Luc Lamontagne & Etienne Marceau, 2020. "Machine Learning in P&C Insurance: A Review for Pricing and Reserving," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, December.
    11. Denuit, Michel & Charpentier, Arthur & Trufin, Julien, 2021. "Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for insurance pricing with machine learning," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021013, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    12. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    13. Antonio R. Linero, 2018. "Bayesian Regression Trees for High-Dimensional Prediction and Variable Selection," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(522), pages 626-636, April.
    14. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Linde, 2014. "The deviance information criterion: 12 years on," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 76(3), pages 485-493, June.
    15. Meng, Shengwang & Gao, Yaqian & Huang, Yifan, 2022. "Actuarial intelligence in auto insurance: Claim frequency modeling with driving behavior features and improved boosted trees," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 115-127.
    16. Antonio R. Linero & Yun Yang, 2018. "Bayesian regression tree ensembles that adapt to smoothness and sparsity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 80(5), pages 1087-1110, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaojun Zhang & Lanpeng Ji & Georgios Aivaliotis & Charles Taylor, 2023. "Bayesian CART models for insurance claims frequency," Papers 2303.01923, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    2. Yaojun Zhang & Lanpeng Ji & Georgios Aivaliotis & Charles C. Taylor, 2024. "Bayesian CART models for aggregate claim modeling," Papers 2409.01908, arXiv.org.
    3. Shengkun Xie & Kun Shi, 2023. "Generalised Additive Modelling of Auto Insurance Data with Territory Design: A Rate Regulation Perspective," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien, 2022. "Autocalibration by balance correction in nonlife insurance pricing," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2022041, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    5. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien, 2022. "Tweedie dominance for autocalibrated predictors and Laplace transform order," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2022040, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    6. Mario V. Wuthrich & Johanna Ziegel, 2023. "Isotonic Recalibration under a Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio," Papers 2301.02692, arXiv.org.
    7. Denuit, Michel & Huyghe, Julie & Trufin, Julien & Verdebout, Thomas, 2024. "Testing for auto-calibration with Lorenz and Concentration curves," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 130-139.
    8. Arthur Charpentier, 2022. "Quantifying fairness and discrimination in predictive models," Papers 2212.09868, arXiv.org.
    9. Fissler, Tobias & Merz, Michael & Wüthrich, Mario V., 2023. "Deep quantile and deep composite triplet regression," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 94-112.
    10. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien & Verdebout, Thomas, 2021. "Testing for more positive expectation dependence with application to model comparison," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021021, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    11. Yang Qiao & Chou-Wen Wang & Wenjun Zhu, 2024. "Machine learning in long-term mortality forecasting," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 49(2), pages 340-362, April.
    12. Kai Yang & Qingqing Zhang & Xinyang Yu & Xiaogang Dong, 2023. "Bayesian inference for a mixture double autoregressive model," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 77(2), pages 188-207, May.
    13. Kelvyn Jones & David Manley & Ron Johnston & Dewi Owen, 2018. "Modelling residential segregation as unevenness and clustering: A multilevel modelling approach incorporating spatial dependence and tackling the MAUP," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(6), pages 1122-1141, November.
    14. Papastamoulis, Panagiotis, 2018. "Overfitting Bayesian mixtures of factor analyzers with an unknown number of components," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 220-234.
    15. Shuhui Guo & Lihua Xiong & Jie Chen & Shenglian Guo & Jun Xia & Ling Zeng & Chong-Yu Xu, 2023. "Nonstationary Regional Flood Frequency Analysis Based on the Bayesian Method," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(2), pages 659-681, January.
    16. Hazelton, Martin L. & Parry, Katharina, 2016. "Statistical methods for comparison of day-to-day traffic models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PA), pages 22-34.
    17. Muhammed Semakula & Franco̧is Niragire & Christel Faes, 2020. "Bayesian spatio-temporal modeling of malaria risk in Rwanda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Falco J. Bargagli Stoffi & Kenneth De Beckker & Joana E. Maldonado & Kristof De Witte, 2021. "Assessing Sensitivity of Machine Learning Predictions.A Novel Toolbox with an Application to Financial Literacy," Papers 2102.04382, arXiv.org.
    19. Fabian Krüger & Sebastian Lerch & Thordis Thorarinsdottir & Tilmann Gneiting, 2021. "Predictive Inference Based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo Output," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(2), pages 274-301, August.
    20. Zhiyu Quan & Changyue Hu & Panyi Dong & Emiliano A. Valdez, 2024. "Improving Business Insurance Loss Models by Leveraging InsurTech Innovation," Papers 2401.16723, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bayesian CART; Claims frequency; DIC; Insurance pricing; MCMC; Negative binomial distribution; Zero-inflated Poisson distribution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:114:y:2024:i:c:p:108-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.