IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aiz/louvad/2021021.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Testing for more positive expectation dependence with application to model comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Denuit, Michel

    (Université catholique de Louvain, LIDAM/ISBA, Belgium)

  • Trufin, Julien

    (ULB)

  • Verdebout, Thomas

    (ULB)

Abstract

Modern data science tools are effective to produce predictions that strongly correlate with responses. Model comparison can therefore be based on the strength of dependence between responses and their predictions. Positive expectation dependence turns out to be attractive in that respect. The present paper proposes an effective testing procedure for this dependence concept and applies it to model selection. A simulation study is performed to evaluate the performances of the proposed testing procedure. Empirical illustrations using insurance loss data demonstrate the relevance of the approach for model selection in supervised learning. The most positively expectation dependent predictor can then be autocalibrated to obtain its balance-corrected version that appears to be optimal with respect to Bregman, or forecast dominance.

Suggested Citation

  • Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien & Verdebout, Thomas, 2021. "Testing for more positive expectation dependence with application to model comparison," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021021, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    • Handle: RePEc:aiz:louvad:2021021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/fr/object/boreal%3A245511/datastream/PDF_01/view
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Denuit & Arthur Charpentier & Julien Trufin, 2021. "Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for Insurance Pricing with Machine Learning," Papers 2103.03635, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    2. Michel Denuit & Louis Eeckhoudt, 2016. "Risk aversion, prudence, and asset allocation: a review and some new developments," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 227-243, February.
    3. Oliver Linton & Yoon Jae Whang & Yu-Min Yen, 2021. "The lower regression function and testing expectation dependence dominance hypotheses," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 709-727, September.
    4. Li, Jingyuan & Liu, Dongri & Wang, Jianli, 2016. "Risk aversion with two risks: A theoretical extension," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 100-105.
    5. Michel Denuit & Louis Eeckhoudt, 2016. "Risk aversion, prudence, and asset allocation: a review and some new developments," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 227-243, February.
    6. Edward W. (Jed) Frees & Glenn Meyers & A. David Cummings, 2014. "Insurance Ratemaking and a Gini Index," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 81(2), pages 335-366, June.
    7. Guo, Xu & Li, Jingyuan, 2016. "Confidence band for expectation dependence with applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 141-149.
    8. Denuit, Michel & Hainaut, Donatien & Trufin, Julien, 2020. "Effective Statistical Learning Methods for Actuaries II : Tree-Based Methods and Extensions," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2020035, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    9. Denuit, Michel & Charpentier, Arthur & Trufin, Julien, 2021. "Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for insurance pricing with machine learning," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021013, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    10. Soon Koo Hong & Keun Ock Lew & Richard MacMinn & Patrick Brockett, 2011. "Mossin's Theorem Given Random Initial Wealth," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 78(2), pages 309-324, June.
    11. Denuit, Michel & Charpentier , Arthur & Trufin, Julien, 2021. "Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for insurance pricing with machine learning," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2021049, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    12. Denuit, Michel, 2010. "Positive dependence of signals," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2010025, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    13. Denuit, Michel M. & Mesfioui, Mhamed, 2017. "Preserving the Rothschild–Stiglitz type increase in risk with background risk: A characterization," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-5.
    14. Denuit, Michel & Sznajder, Dominik & Trufin, Julien, 2019. "Model selection based on Lorenz and concentration curves, Gini indices and convex order," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2019046, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    15. Denuit, Michel & Charpentier, Arthur & Trufin, Julien, 2021. "Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for insurance pricing with machine learning," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 485-497.
    16. Garry F. Barrett & Stephen G. Donald, 2003. "Consistent Tests for Stochastic Dominance," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 71-104, January.
    17. Denuit, Michel & Eeckhoudt, Louis, 2016. "Risk aversion, prudence, and asset allocation : a review and some new developments," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2016009, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    18. Frees, Edward W. & Meyers, Glenn & Cummings, A. David, 2011. "Summarizing Insurance Scores Using a Gini Index," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(495), pages 1085-1098.
    19. Denuit, Michel & Sznajder, Dominik & Trufin, Julien, 2019. "Model selection based on Lorenz and concentration curves, Gini indices and convex order," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 128-139.
    20. Denuit, Michel & Mesfioui, Mhamed, 2017. "Preserving the Rothschild–Stiglitz type increase in risk with background risk: A characterization," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2017002, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    21. Juan-JosÈ Ganuza & JosÈ S. Penalva, 2010. "Signal Orderings Based on Dispersion and the Supply of Private Information in Auctions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 1007-1030, May.
    22. Denuit, Michel & Sznajder, Dominik & Trufin, Julien, 2019. "Model selection based on Lorenz and concentration curves, Gini indices and convex order," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019006, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    23. Li, Jingyuan, 2011. "The demand for a risky asset in the presence of a background risk," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 372-391, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien & Verdebout, Thomas, 2021. "Testing for more positive expectation dependence with application to model comparison," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 163-172.
    2. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien, 2022. "Autocalibration by balance correction in nonlife insurance pricing," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2022041, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    3. Yaojun Zhang & Lanpeng Ji & Georgios Aivaliotis & Charles C. Taylor, 2024. "Bayesian CART models for aggregate claim modeling," Papers 2409.01908, arXiv.org.
    4. Wong, Kit Pong, 2021. "Comparative risk aversion with two risks," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Michel Denuit & Christian Y. Robert, 2021. "Risk sharing under the dominant peer‐to‐peer property and casualty insurance business models," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 24(2), pages 181-205, June.
    6. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "Risk sharing under the dominant peer-to-peer property and casualty insurance business models," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021001, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    7. Yves Staudt & Joël Wagner, 2021. "Assessing the Performance of Random Forests for Modeling Claim Severity in Collision Car Insurance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-28, March.
    8. Denuit, Michel & Sznajder, Dominik & Trufin, Julien, 2019. "Model selection based on Lorenz and concentration curves, Gini indices and convex order," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019006, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    9. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien, 2022. "Tweedie dominance for autocalibrated predictors and Laplace transform order," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2022040, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    10. Mario V. Wuthrich & Johanna Ziegel, 2023. "Isotonic Recalibration under a Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio," Papers 2301.02692, arXiv.org.
    11. Arthur Charpentier, 2022. "Quantifying fairness and discrimination in predictive models," Papers 2212.09868, arXiv.org.
    12. Yaojun Zhang & Lanpeng Ji & Georgios Aivaliotis & Charles Taylor, 2023. "Bayesian CART models for insurance claims frequency," Papers 2303.01923, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    13. Willame, Gireg & Trufin, Julien & Denuit, Michel, 2023. "Boosted Poisson regression trees: A guide to the BT package in R," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2023008, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    14. Fissler, Tobias & Merz, Michael & Wüthrich, Mario V., 2023. "Deep quantile and deep composite triplet regression," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 94-112.
    15. Zhang, Yaojun & Ji, Lanpeng & Aivaliotis, Georgios & Taylor, Charles, 2024. "Bayesian CART models for insurance claims frequency," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 108-131.
    16. Shengkun Xie & Kun Shi, 2023. "Generalised Additive Modelling of Auto Insurance Data with Territory Design: A Rate Regulation Perspective," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-24, January.
    17. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien, 2021. "Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient, and Tweedie dominance for autocalibrated predictors," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021036, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    18. Jolien Ponnet & Robin Van Oirbeek & Tim Verdonck, 2021. "Concordance Probability for Insurance Pricing Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-26, October.
    19. Denuit, Michel & Charpentier, Arthur & Trufin, Julien, 2021. "Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for insurance pricing with machine learning," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 485-497.
    20. Wakker, Peter P. & Yang, Jingni, 2021. "Concave/convex weighting and utility functions for risk: A new light on classical theorems," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 429-435.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Expectation dependence ; concentration curve ; Lorenz curve ; autocalibration ; convex order ; balance correction;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiz:louvad:2021021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nadja Peiffer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isuclbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.