IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v31y2011i1p53-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

e-Government stakeholders—Who are they and what do they want?

Author

Listed:
  • Rowley, Jennifer

Abstract

There is an increasing recognition that various stakeholder groups for e-government have a significant role to play in ensuring the long-term success of the e-government enterprise. This article seeks to contribute to the understanding of the stakeholders’ multiple perspectives by proposing typologies of stakeholder roles, and stakeholder benefits, respectively, and embedding these in a stakeholder benefits analysis tool. A literature review is used to surface the diverse existing categorizations of e-government stakeholders and their interests and the benefits sought. This review informs a proposal for a typology of stakeholder roles, and for a typology of stakeholder benefits, which together are used to construct an initial proposal for a stakeholder benefits analysis tool (SBAT), which can be used to map stakeholder roles to stakeholder benefits. This tool has been tested by an expert group, and revised. This exploratory study is an important first step towards the development of tools and approaches for understanding the benefits sought by a wide range of different stakeholder groups in e-government. Progress in the development of such tools is important for the development of knowledge and practice, policy, and evaluation with respect to stakeholder engagement with, and participation in, e-government.

Suggested Citation

  • Rowley, Jennifer, 2011. "e-Government stakeholders—Who are they and what do they want?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 53-62.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:31:y:2011:i:1:p:53-62
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401210000666
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beynon-Davies, Paul, 2005. "Constructing electronic government: the case of the UK inland revenue," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 3-20.
    2. George A. Boyne, 2002. "Public and Private Management: What’s the Difference?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 97-122, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tate, Mary & Bongiovanni, Ivano & Kowalkiewicz, Marek & Townson, Peter, 2018. "Managing the “Fuzzy front end” of open digital service innovation in the public sector: A methodology," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 186-198.
    2. Carolina Pontones-Rosa & Rosario Perez-Morote & Montserrat Nunez-Chicharro & Inmaculada Alonso-Carrillo, 2023. "E-government in Depopulated Rural Areas. An Approach to the Reality of Spanish Municipalities," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(4), pages 1-34, August.
    3. Dodik Ariyanto & Ayu Aryista Dewi & Henny Triyana Hasibuan & Rizky Bagus Paramadani, 2022. "The Success of Information Systems and Sustainable Information Society: Measuring the Implementation of a Village Financial System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Aladwani, Adel M., 2016. "Corruption as a source of e-Government projects failure in developing countries: A theoretical exposition," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 105-112.
    5. Sacchi Agnese & Santolini Raffaella & Schneider Friedrich, 2022. "On the effects of e-participation on shadow economy: a worldwide empirical analysis," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 23(3), pages 463-491, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carole RENTSCH & Matthias FINGER, 2014. "Yes, no, maybe: the ambiguous relationships between State-owned enterprises and States," Departmental Working Papers 2014-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    2. Arundel, Anthony & Casali, Luca & Hollanders, Hugo, 2015. "How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1271-1282.
    3. Leask, Anna, 2010. "Progress in visitor attraction research: Towards more effective management," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 155-166.
    4. Bilal Anwar & Zhongdong Xiao & Sharmin Akter & Ramiz-Ur Rehman, 2017. "Sustainable Urbanization and Development Goals Strategy through Public–Private Partnerships in a South-Asian Metropolis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, October.
    5. Thi Cam Tu Luong & Ann Jorissen & Ine Paeleman, 2019. "Performance Measurement for Sustainability: Does Firm Ownership Matter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-35, August.
    6. van der Voet, Joris, 2014. "The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 373-382.
    7. Martin Warland, 2016. "What kinds of regional innovation systems occur around federal agencies?," Diskussionsschriften credresearchpaper10, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft - CRED.
    8. Raake, Anke & Gleich, Ronald & Wald, Andreas, 2008. "Anwendungsstand und Erfolgsfaktoren von Kennzahlen- und Performance Measurement-Systemen in öffentlichen Unternehmen – Ergebnisse einer Studie im Öffentlichen Personennahverkehr," ZögU - Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 31(4), pages 408-426.
    9. Benedict C. Doepfer & André Habisch & Harald Pechlaner & Xenia-Isabel Poppe & Christoph Schwarz, 2016. "Entrepreneurship, shared values and the region - assessing the conditions for regional social performance of entrepreneurial behaviour," International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 36-56.
    10. Giuliana Bronzoni Liberato & Marcelo Sanches Pagliarussi, 2008. "Disclosure de estratégia em relatórios anuais: a influência das dimensões culturais, do sistema legal e da governança corporativa em empresas de quatro países," Fucape Working Papers 03, Fucape Business School.
    11. Vahid Javidroozi & Hanifa Shah & Gerald Feldman, 2022. "Facilitating Smart City Development through Adaption of the Learnings from Enterprise Systems Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Marukan Hendrik & Bambang Supriyono & M.R. Khayrul Muluk & Mardiyono Mardiyono, 2018. "Assessing the Influence of Leadership on the Implementation of Good Governance in a New Autonomous Region," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 6, pages 5-23.
    13. Porcher, Simon, 2017. "The ‘hidden costs’ of water provision: New evidence from the relationship between contracting-out and price in French water public services," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 166-175.
    14. Simović Dragana, 2015. "Project Management in Development Aid Industry – Public vs. Private," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 21(72), pages 167-197, February.
    15. Jan-Erik Johanson & Elias Pekkola & Päivi Husman, 2017. "Government Programme as a Strategy—The Finnish Experience," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Yongbeom Hur, 2018. "Testing Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory of Motivation in the Public Sector: Is it Applicable to Public Managers?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 329-343, September.
    17. Marian W. Moszoro & Pablo T. Spiller, 2012. "Third-Party Opportunism and the Nature of Public Contracts," NBER Working Papers 18636, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Roehrich, Jens K. & Lewis, Michael A. & George, Gerard, 2014. "Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 110-119.
    19. Halit Karaxha, 2019. "The Importance of Implementing Changes in Organizations," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 22(72), pages 25-36, June.
    20. Thomson, Ian & Grubnic, Suzana & Georgakopoulos, Georgios, 2014. "Exploring accounting-sustainability hybridisation in the UK public sector," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 453-476.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:31:y:2011:i:1:p:53-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.