IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v13y2011i2p97-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How and why forest managers adapt to socio-economic changes: A case study analysis in Swiss forest enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Ingold, Karin
  • Zimmermann, Willi

Abstract

Forestry is an important source of income for forest owners and those employed in rural areas. In recent years, this sector has had to tackle far-reaching changes taking place in the social, economic and political system. New demands are now being addressed and policies reformulated. As a response to this pressure, new decision-making structures and innovation activities are taking place in the forestry sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Ingold, Karin & Zimmermann, Willi, 2011. "How and why forest managers adapt to socio-economic changes: A case study analysis in Swiss forest enterprises," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 97-103.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:13:y:2011:i:2:p:97-103
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.06.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934110000808
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.06.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Easterby‐Smith & Mary Crossan & Davide Nicolini, 2000. "Organizational Learning: Debates Past, Present And Future," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 783-796, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ikonen, Piia & Rantala, Mirja & Miettinen, Janne & Kuittinen, Suvi & Hujala, Teppo & Mehtätalo, Lauri & Pappinen, Ari, 2020. "Grounds for improving the implementation of game-oriented forest management – A double sampling survey of Finnish forest owners and professionals," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Grace B. Villamor & Andrew Dunningham & Philip Stahlmann-Brown & Peter W. Clinton, 2022. "Improving the Representation of Climate Change Adaptation Behaviour in New Zealand’s Forest Growing Sector," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Holopainen, Jani & Mattila, Osmo & Pöyry, Essi & Parvinen, Petri, 2020. "Applying design science research methodology in the development of virtual reality forest management services," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    4. Shrestha, Krishna K. & Paudel, Govinda & Ojha, Hemant & Paudel, Naya Sharma & Nuberg, Ian & Cedamon, Edwin, 2022. "Community entrepreneurship: Lessons from Nepal's Chaubas community forestry sawmill," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Kaeser, Alexandra & Bernasconi, Jasmin & Zimmermann, Willi, 2013. "Governance approaches in Swiss forest biodiversity policy: Do they really work?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 6-13.
    6. Esmee D. Kooijman & Siobhan McQuaid & Mary-Lee Rhodes & Marcus J. Collier & Francesco Pilla, 2021. "Innovating with Nature: From Nature-Based Solutions to Nature-Based Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Jarský, Vilém, 2015. "Analysis of the sectoral innovation system for forestry of the Czech Republic. Does it even exist?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 56-65.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dario Blanco-Fernandez & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2022. "Interactions between the individual and the group level in organizations: The case of learning and autonomous group adaptation," Papers 2203.09162, arXiv.org.
    2. Jon Reast & Adam Lindgreen & Joëlle Vanhamme & François Maon, 2010. "The Manchester Super Casino: Experience and Learning in a Cross-Sector Social Partnership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 197-218, July.
    3. Liang Chen & Wanli Li, 2022. "Language acquisition and regional innovation: Evidence from English proficiency in China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 178-191, January.
    4. Li, Wen Helena & Guo, Bin & De Sisto, Marco, 2021. "Untangling the commonalities and differences between domestic cross-regional experience and international experience in shaping speed of internationalization," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(2).
    5. Arh, Tanja & Blazic, Borka Jerman & Dimovski, Vlado, 2012. "The impact of technology-enhanced organisational learning on business performance: An empirical study," Journal of East European Management Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 17(3), pages 369-383.
    6. Sandra Charreire, 2003. "Les rôles de la migration et de la légitimation des savoirs dans l'apprentissage organisationnel:études de cas," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 6(2), pages 115-153, June.
    7. Joanna KUROWSKA-PYSZ, 2020. "The process of joint learning as a determinant of cross-border project management," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 47-76, November.
    8. Siyuan Yu & Yang Zhang & Jin Yu & Xuanzhi Yang & Abbas Mardani, 2021. "The Moderating Impact of Organizational Identity Strength between Strategic Improvisation and Organizational Memory and Their Effects on Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Devaki Rau & Thorvald Haerem, 2010. "Applying an organizational learning perspective to new technology deployment by technological gatekeepers: A theoretical model and key issues for future research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 287-297, July.
    10. Abdul Kadir Othman & Hazman Shah Abdullah & Jasmine Ahmad, 2008. "Emotional Intelligence, Emotional Labour and Work Effectiveness in Service Organisations: A Proposed Model," Vision, , vol. 12(1), pages 31-42, January.
    11. Blanka, Christine & Krumay, Barbara & Rueckel, David, 2022. "The interplay of digital transformation and employee competency: A design science approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    12. Burt, George & Nair, Anup Karath, 2020. "Rigidities of imagination in scenario planning: Strategic foresight through ‘Unlearning’," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    13. Hamza Bukari Zakaria & Aminu Mamman, 2015. "Where is the Organisational Memory? A Tale of Local Government Employees in Ghana," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 267-279, June.
    14. Johannes G. Jaspersen & Richard Peter, 2017. "Experiential Learning, Competitive Selection, and Downside Risk: A New Perspective on Managerial Risk Taking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 915-930, October.
    15. Ojha, Divesh & Struckell, Elisabeth & Acharya, Chandan & Patel, Pankaj C., 2018. "Supply chain organizational learning, exploration, exploitation, and firm performance: A creation-dispersion perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 70-82.
    16. Pablo Martin de Holan & Nelson Phillips, 2004. "Remembrance of Things Past? The Dynamics of Organizational Forgetting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1603-1613, November.
    17. José G. Vargas Hernández & Mohammad Reza Noruzi, 2010. "The Study of Three Organizational Enigmas; Organizational Economy, Organizational Business and Organizational Skills," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 1(1), pages 68-87, March.
    18. Emmanuel Lazega & Saraï Sapulete & Lise Mounier, 2011. "Structural stability regardless of membership turnover? The added value of blockmodelling in the analysis of network evolution," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 129-144, January.
    19. repec:pab:wpbsad:12.04 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Gerson Francis Tuazon & Rachel Wolfgramm & Kyle Powys Whyte, 2021. "Can You Drink Money? Integrating Organizational Perspective-Taking and Organizational Resilience in a Multi-level Systems Framework for Sustainability Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 469-490, January.
    21. Linda Argote & Ella Miron-Spektor, 2011. "Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1123-1137, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:13:y:2011:i:2:p:97-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.