IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v87y2015icp594-604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CO2-free biohydrogen production by mixed dark and photofermentation bacteria from sorghum starch using a modified simple purification and collection system

Author

Listed:
  • Morsy, Fatthy Mohamed

Abstract

In this study two tasks were accomplished. First, a modified simple purification and collection lab system is described for CO2-free bio-hydrogen production. Second, the efficiency of hydrogen production was investigated by mixed dark and photo-fermentative hydrogen producing bacteria Escherichia coli, Clostridium acetobutylicum, Rhodobacter capsulatus and Rhodobacter sphaeroides from sorghum grains crude starch. The crude starch of white sorghum grains showed a higher potency as a carbon source for fermentative hydrogen production than that of red sorghum grains although both varieties are quite applicable for industrial scale hydrogen production. Using mixed R. capsulatus and R. sphaeroides showed a higher efficiency for hydrogen production than using each alone in the combined dark and photo-fermentation due to their varying efficiencies of converting various volatile fatty acids produced by dark fermentation into hydrogen gas. For enhanced hydrogen production, this study suggests using mixed strains of non-oxygenic photosynthetic purple non-sulfur bacteria in the combined dark and photo-fermentation. The high efficiency of hydrogen production from sorghum starch suggests that using this cheap crop in future industrial application of biological H2 production would increase its economic feasibility in developing countries of arid climate where sorghum is no longer widely used as human food.

Suggested Citation

  • Morsy, Fatthy Mohamed, 2015. "CO2-free biohydrogen production by mixed dark and photofermentation bacteria from sorghum starch using a modified simple purification and collection system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 594-604.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:87:y:2015:i:c:p:594-604
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544215006258
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piekarczyk, Wodzisław & Czarnowska, Lucyna & Ptasiński, Krzysztof & Stanek, Wojciech, 2013. "Thermodynamic evaluation of biomass-to-biofuels production systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 95-104.
    2. Meyer, Markus A. & Weiss, Annika, 2014. "Life cycle costs for the optimized production of hydrogen and biogas from microalgae," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 84-93.
    3. Xia, Ao & Cheng, Jun & Lin, Richen & Ding, Lingkan & Zhou, Junhu & Cen, Kefa, 2013. "Combination of hydrogen fermentation and methanogenesis to enhance energy conversion efficiency from trehalose," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 631-637.
    4. van der Heijden, Harro & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J., 2012. "Exergy analysis of thermochemical ethanol production via biomass gasification and catalytic synthesis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 200-210.
    5. Kvesitadze, G. & Sadunishvili, T. & Dudauri, T. & Zakariashvili, N. & Partskhaladze, G. & Ugrekhelidze, V. & Tsiklauri, G. & Metreveli, B. & Jobava, M., 2012. "Two-stage anaerobic process for bio-hydrogen and bio-methane combined production from biodegradable solid wastes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 94-102.
    6. Lin, Kuang C. & Lin, Yuan-Chung & Hsiao, Yi-Hsing, 2014. "Microwave plasma studies of Spirulina algae pyrolysis with relevance to hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 567-574.
    7. Han, S.-H. & Cho, D.H. & Kim, Y.H. & Shin, S.-J., 2013. "Biobutanol production from 2-year-old willow biomass by acid hydrolysis and acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 13-17.
    8. Prins, Mark J. & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Janssen, Frans J.J.G., 2006. "More efficient biomass gasification via torrefaction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 3458-3470.
    9. Barbir, Frano, 2009. "Transition to renewable energy systems with hydrogen as an energy carrier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 308-312.
    10. Prins, M.J. & Ptasinski, K.J., 2005. "Energy and exergy analyses of the oxidation and gasification of carbon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 982-1002.
    11. Tseng, Phillip & Lee, John & Friley, Paul, 2005. "A hydrogen economy: opportunities and challenges," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(14), pages 2703-2720.
    12. Küçük, Kübra & Tevatia, Rahul & Sorgüven, Esra & Demirel, Yaşar & Özilgen, Mustafa, 2015. "Bioenergetics of growth and lipid production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 503-510.
    13. Juraščík, Martin & Sues, Anna & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J., 2010. "Exergy analysis of synthetic natural gas production method from biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 880-888.
    14. Ghimire, Anish & Frunzo, Luigi & Pirozzi, Francesco & Trably, Eric & Escudie, Renaud & Lens, Piet N.L. & Esposito, Giovanni, 2015. "A review on dark fermentative biohydrogen production from organic biomass: Process parameters and use of by-products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 73-95.
    15. Wong, Y.M. & Juan, J.C. & Ting, Adeline & Wu, T.Y., 2014. "High efficiency bio-hydrogen production from glucose revealed in an inoculum of heat-pretreated landfill leachate sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 628-635.
    16. Abd-Alla, Mohamed Hemida & Bagy, Magdy Mohamed Khalil & Morsy, Fatthy Mohamed & Hassan, Elhagag Ahmed, 2014. "Enhancement of biodiesel, hydrogen and methane generation from molasses by Cunninghamella echinulata and anaerobic bacteria through sequential three-stage fermentation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 543-554.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zieliński, Marcin & Korzeniewska, Ewa & Filipkowska, Zofia & Dębowski, Marcin & Harnisz, Monika & Kwiatkowski, Rafał, 2017. "Biohydrogen production at low load of organic matter by psychrophilic bacteria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1132-1139.
    2. Azman, Nadia Farhana & Abdeshahian, Peyman & Kadier, Abudukeremu & Shukor, Hafiza & Al-Shorgani, Najeeb Kaid Nasser & Hamid, Aidil Abdul & Kalil, Mohd Sahaid, 2016. "Utilization of palm kernel cake as a renewable feedstock for fermentative hydrogen production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 700-708.
    3. Singh, Neeraj Kumar & Kumari, Priyanka & Singh, Rajesh, 2021. "Intensified hydrogen yield using hydrogenase rich sulfate-reducing bacteria in bio-electrochemical system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    4. Xia, Ao & Jacob, Amita & Herrmann, Christiane & Murphy, Jerry D., 2016. "Fermentative bio-hydrogen production from galactose," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 346-354.
    5. Moreira, F.S. & Rodrigues, M.S. & Sousa, L.M. & Batista, F.R.X. & Ferreira, J.S. & Cardoso, V.L., 2022. "Single-stage repeated batch cycles using co-culture of Enterobacter cloacae and purple non-sulfur bacteria for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    6. Morsy, Fatthy Mohamed & Ibrahim, Samir Hag, 2016. "Concomitant hydrolysis of sucrose by the long half-life time yeast invertase and hydrogen production by the hydrogen over-producing Escherichia coli HD701," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 412-419.
    7. Patel, Sanjay K.S. & Das, Devashish & Kim, Sun Chang & Cho, Byung-Kwan & Kalia, Vipin Chandra & Lee, Jung-Kul, 2021. "Integrating strategies for sustainable conversion of waste biomass into dark-fermentative hydrogen and value-added products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    8. Ferraren-De Cagalitan, D.D.T. & Abundo, M.L.S., 2021. "A review of biohydrogen production technology for application towards hydrogen fuel cells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Zagrodnik, Roman & Duber, Anna, 2024. "Continuous dark-photo fermentative H2 production from synthetic lignocellulose hydrolysate with different photoheterotrophic cultures: Sequential vs. co-culture processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    10. Machado, R.G. & Moreira, F.S. & Batista, F.R.X. & Ferreira, J.S. & Cardoso, V.L., 2018. "Repeated batch cycles as an alternative for hydrogen production by co-culture photofermentation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 861-869.
    11. Liu, Yuxiang & Liang, Tao & Yuan, Xin & Lv, Yongkang, 2019. "The performance of COD removal and hydrogen production in a single stage system from starch using the consortium PB-Z under simulated natural conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 951-958.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Loha, Chanchal & Chattopadhyay, Himadri & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4063-4071.
    2. Singh, Neeraj Kumar & Kumari, Priyanka & Singh, Rajesh, 2021. "Intensified hydrogen yield using hydrogenase rich sulfate-reducing bacteria in bio-electrochemical system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    3. Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Bartela, Łukasz & Kotowicz, Janusz & Sobolewski, Aleksander & Iluk, Tomasz & Remiorz, Leszek, 2014. "The influence of the size of the CHP (combined heat and power) system integrated with a biomass fueled gas generator and piston engine on the thermodynamic and economic effectiveness of electricity an," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 328-340.
    4. Ruban, Priya & Sellappa, Kanmani, 2014. "Development and performance of bench-scale reactor for the photocatalytic generation of hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 926-932.
    5. Saidur, R. & BoroumandJazi, G. & Mekhilef, S. & Mohammed, H.A., 2012. "A review on exergy analysis of biomass based fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1217-1222.
    6. Morsy, Fatthy Mohamed & Ibrahim, Samir Hag, 2016. "Concomitant hydrolysis of sucrose by the long half-life time yeast invertase and hydrogen production by the hydrogen over-producing Escherichia coli HD701," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 412-419.
    7. Xiang, Yangyang & Zhou, Jingsong & Lin, Bowen & Xue, Xiaoao & Tian, Xingtao & Luo, Zhongyang, 2015. "Exergetic evaluation of renewable light olefins production from biomass via synthetic methanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 499-507.
    8. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    9. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Valijanian, Elena & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ghanavati, Hossein & Sulaiman, Alawi & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosr, 2020. "A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 2: Mainstream and downstream strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1392-1407.
    10. Kotowicz, Janusz & Sobolewski, Aleksander & Iluk, Tomasz, 2013. "Energetic analysis of a system integrated with biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 265-278.
    11. Kuo, Po-Chih & Illathukandy, Biju & Wu, Wei & Chang, Jo-Shu, 2021. "Energy, exergy, and environmental analyses of renewable hydrogen production through plasma gasification of microalgal biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    12. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    13. Tian, Hailin & Li, Jie & Yan, Miao & Tong, Yen Wah & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Wang, Xiaonan, 2019. "Organic waste to biohydrogen: A critical review from technological development and environmental impact analysis perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    14. Xia, Ao & Cheng, Jun & Ding, Lingkan & Lin, Richen & Song, Wenlu & Zhou, Junhu & Cen, Kefa, 2014. "Effects of changes in microbial community on the fermentative production of hydrogen and soluble metabolites from Chlorella pyrenoidosa biomass in semi-continuous operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 982-988.
    15. Wang, Sheng & Bi, Xiaotao & Wang, Shudong, 2015. "Thermodynamic analysis of biomass gasification for biomethane production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1207-1218.
    16. Xia, Ao & Jacob, Amita & Herrmann, Christiane & Murphy, Jerry D., 2016. "Fermentative bio-hydrogen production from galactose," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 346-354.
    17. Ahmed, A.M.A & Salmiaton, A. & Choong, T.S.Y & Wan Azlina, W.A.K.G., 2015. "Review of kinetic and equilibrium concepts for biomass tar modeling by using Aspen Plus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1623-1644.
    18. Bharathiraja, B. & Jayamuthunagai, J. & Sudharsanaa, T. & Bharghavi, A. & Praveenkumar, R. & Chakravarthy, M. & Yuvaraj, D., 2017. "Biobutanol – An impending biofuel for future: A review on upstream and downstream processing tecniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 788-807.
    19. Luz, Fábio Codignole & Cordiner, Stefano & Manni, Alessandro & Mulone, Vincenzo & Rocco, Vittorio, 2017. "Anaerobic digestion of coffee grounds soluble fraction at laboratory scale: Evaluation of the biomethane potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 166-175.
    20. Yang, Guang & Wang, Jianlong, 2018. "Various additives for improving dark fermentative hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 130-146.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:87:y:2015:i:c:p:594-604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.