IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v35y2010i2p880-888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergy analysis of synthetic natural gas production method from biomass

Author

Listed:
  • Juraščík, Martin
  • Sues, Anna
  • Ptasinski, Krzysztof J.

Abstract

The paper presents the results of exergy analysis for a biomass-to-synthetic natural gas (SNG) conversion process. The presented study is based on wood gasification, which is analysed for different gasification conditions like temperature and/or pressure. The analysed temperature was varied in the range from 650 to 800°C and the pressure range was from 1 to 15bar. The main process units of biomass-to-SNG conversion technology are gasifier, gas cleaning, synthesis gas compression, CH4 synthesis and final SNG conditioning. The results showed that the largest exergy losses take place in the biomass gasifier, CH4 synthesis part and CO2 capture unit. The overall exergetic efficiency of the biomass-to-SNG process was estimated in the range of about 69.5–71.8%.

Suggested Citation

  • Juraščík, Martin & Sues, Anna & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J., 2010. "Exergy analysis of synthetic natural gas production method from biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 880-888.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:2:p:880-888
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054420900320X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gassner, M. & Maréchal, F., 2008. "Thermo-economic optimisation of the integration of electrolysis in synthetic natural gas production from wood," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 189-198.
    2. Prins, Mark J. & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Janssen, Frans J.J.G., 2007. "From coal to biomass gasification: Comparison of thermodynamic efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1248-1259.
    3. Lampert, Krzysztof & Ziebik, Andrzej, 2007. "Comparative analysis of energy requirements of CO2 removal from metallurgical fuel gases," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 521-527.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gassner, Martin & Maréchal, François, 2009. "Thermodynamic comparison of the FICFB and Viking gasification concepts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1744-1753.
    2. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    3. Balcombe, Paul & Speirs, Jamie & Johnson, Erin & Martin, Jeanne & Brandon, Nigel & Hawkes, Adam, 2018. "The carbon credentials of hydrogen gas networks and supply chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1077-1088.
    4. Loha, Chanchal & Chattopadhyay, Himadri & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4063-4071.
    5. Ngo, Son Ich & Nguyen, Thanh D.B. & Lim, Young-Il & Song, Byung-Ho & Lee, Uen-Do & Choi, Young-Tai & Song, Jae-Hun, 2011. "Performance evaluation for dual circulating fluidized-bed steam gasifier of biomass using quasi-equilibrium three-stage gasification model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 5208-5220.
    6. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Pongrácz, Eva & Fabritius, Timo, 2013. "The potential of using biomass-based reducing agents in the blast furnace: A review of thermochemical conversion technologies and assessments related to sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 511-528.
    7. van der Heijden, Harro & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J., 2012. "Exergy analysis of thermochemical ethanol production via biomass gasification and catalytic synthesis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 200-210.
    8. Jiang, Jianrong & Feng, Xiao, 2019. "Energy optimization of ammonia synthesis processes based on oxygen purity under different purification technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 819-828.
    9. Mazzoni, Luca & Janajreh, Isam & Elagroudy, Sherien & Ghenai, Chaouki, 2020. "Modeling of plasma and entrained flow co-gasification of MSW and petroleum sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    10. Ravaghi-Ardebili, Zohreh & Manenti, Flavio & Corbetta, Michele & Pirola, Carlo & Ranzi, Eliseo, 2015. "Biomass gasification using low-temperature solar-driven steam supply," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 671-680.
    11. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Carvalho, João A. & Coronado, Christian J.R., 2014. "Thermochemical equilibrium modeling of biomass downdraft gasifier: Stoichiometric models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 189-201.
    12. Lopez-Urionabarrenechea, A. & de Marco, I. & Caballero, B.M. & Adrados, A. & Laresgoiti, M.F., 2012. "Empiric model for the prediction of packaging waste pyrolysis yields," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 524-532.
    13. La Villetta, M. & Costa, M. & Massarotti, N., 2017. "Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 71-88.
    14. Clausen, Lasse R., 2017. "Energy efficient thermochemical conversion of very wet biomass to biofuels by integration of steam drying, steam electrolysis and gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 327-336.
    15. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    16. Nadia Cerone & Francesco Zimbardi, 2018. "Gasification of Agroresidues for Syngas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Md Tanvir Alam & Se-Won Park & Sang-Yeop Lee & Yean-Ouk Jeong & Anthony De Girolamo & Yong-Chil Seo & Hang Seok Choi, 2020. "Co-Gasification of Treated Solid Recovered Fuel Residue by Using Minerals Bed and Biomass Waste Blends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Lampert, Krzysztof & Ziebik, Andrzej & Stanek, Wojciech, 2010. "Thermoeconomical analysis of CO2 removal from the Corex export gas and its integration with the blast-furnace assembly and metallurgical combined heat and power (CHP) plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1188-1195.
    19. Lee, See Hoon & Yoon, Sang Jun & Ra, Ho Won & Son, Young Il & Hong, Jai Chang & Lee, Jae Goo, 2010. "Gasification characteristics of coke and mixture with coal in an entrained-flow gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3239-3244.
    20. Leimert, Jonas M. & Neubert, Michael & Treiber, Peter & Dillig, Marius & Karl, Jürgen, 2018. "Combining the Heatpipe Reformer technology with hydrogen-intensified methanation for production of synthetic natural gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 37-46.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:2:p:880-888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.