IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v301y2024ics0360544224014750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of permeability rebound and recovery of tectonic and intact coal: Implications for coalbed methane recovery in tectonic coal reservoirs

Author

Listed:
  • Wei, Jiaqi
  • Su, Erlei
  • Xu, Guangwei
  • Yang, Yuqiang
  • Han, Shuran
  • Chen, Xiangjun
  • Chen, Haidong
  • An, Fenghua

Abstract

The permeability rebound and recovery of coal reservoirs is one of the key factors affecting the efficient recovery of coalbed methane (CBM). Most studies focus on the permeability rebound and recovery of intact coal reservoirs. Conversely, the permeability rebound characteristics of tectonic coal have only been rarely investigated. In this paper, an improved fully coupled mathematical model for methane transport of tectonic coal and intact coal seam was established. Then, the phenomenon of permeability rebound and recovery was analyzed theoretically, and the permeability rebound time, rebound value and recovery time were proposed to compare the difference in permeability evolution. In addition, the permeability rebound characteristics of tectonic and intact coal were evaluated for different geological parameters of coal reservoirs. The results indicate that the rebound time and recovery time of both intact and tectonic coal increase with the increase of initial gas pressure. As the initial permeability increases, the permeability rebound time of intact and tectonic coal show a decreasing trend. The permeability rebound time of intact coal decreases with increasing initial diffusion coefficient, while that of tectonic coal shows the opposite trend. Furthermore, the change in permeability recovery time for tectonic coal is 6.59 times larger than for intact coal, indicating that the effect of permeability rebound phenomenon is more significant during gas extraction in tectonic coal reservoirs. Finally, a conceptual model was proposed to explain the differential mechanism of permeability rebound between tectonic and intact coal, and its implications for CBM recovery in tectonic coal reservoirs was discussed. Therefore, the results presented in this paper can provide a theoretical basis for the efficient development of CBM in tectonic coal reservoirs.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei, Jiaqi & Su, Erlei & Xu, Guangwei & Yang, Yuqiang & Han, Shuran & Chen, Xiangjun & Chen, Haidong & An, Fenghua, 2024. "Comparative analysis of permeability rebound and recovery of tectonic and intact coal: Implications for coalbed methane recovery in tectonic coal reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:301:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224014750
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.131702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224014750
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131702?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Kai & Wang, Yanhai & Xu, Chao & Guo, Haijun & Xu, Zhiyuan & Liu, Yifu & Dong, Huzi & Ju, Yang, 2023. "Modeling of multi-field gas desorption-diffusion in coal: A new insight into the bidisperse model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    2. Su, Erlei & Liang, Yunpei & Chen, Xiangjun & Wang, Zhaofeng & Ni, Xiaoming & Zou, Quanle & Chen, Haidong & Wei, Jiaqi, 2023. "Relationship between pore structure and mechanical properties of bituminous coal under sub-critical and super-critical CO2 treatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    3. David McCollum & Nico Bauer & Katherine Calvin & Alban Kitous & Keywan Riahi, 2014. "Fossil resource and energy security dynamics in conventional and carbon-constrained worlds," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 413-426, April.
    4. Sun, Fengrui & Liu, Dameng & Cai, Yidong & Qiu, Yongkai, 2023. "A micro-macro coupled permeability model for gas transport in coalbed methane reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    5. Erlei Su & Yunpei Liang & Lei Li & Quanle Zou & Fanfan Niu, 2018. "Laboratory Study on Changes in the Pore Structures and Gas Desorption Properties of Intact and Tectonic Coals after Supercritical CO 2 Treatment: Implications for Coalbed Methane Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Du, Shuyi & Wang, Jiulong & Wang, Meizhu & Yang, Jiaosheng & Zhang, Cong & Zhao, Yang & Song, Hongqing, 2023. "A systematic data-driven approach for production forecasting of coalbed methane incorporating deep learning and ensemble learning adapted to complex production patterns," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shi, Yu & Lin, Baiquan & Liu, Ting & Liu, Tong & Zhang, Xiangliang & Yang, Wei, 2024. "Study on the influence of stress constraint conditions on multi-scale gas emission characteristics in in-situ coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    2. Ruben Bibas & C. Cassen & Renaud Crassous & Céline Guivarch & Meriem Hamdi-Cherif & Jean Charles Hourcade & Florian Leblanc & Aurélie Méjean & Eoin Ó Broin & Julie Rozenberg & Olivier Sassi & Adrien V, 2022. "IMpact Assessment of CLIMate policies with IMACLIM-R 1.1. Model documentation version 1.1," Working Papers hal-03702627, HAL.
    3. Griffin, Paul A. & Jaffe, Amy Myers & Lont, David H. & Dominguez-Faus, Rosa, 2015. "Science and the stock market: Investors' recognition of unburnable carbon," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PA), pages 1-12.
    4. Xu, Chao & Wang, Wenjing & Wang, Kai & Zhou, Aitao & Guo, Lin & Yang, Tong, 2023. "Filling–adsorption mechanism and diffusive transport characteristics of N2/CO2 in coal: Experiment and molecular simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    5. Song, Hongqing & Lao, Junming & Zhang, Liyuan & Xie, Chiyu & Wang, Yuhe, 2023. "Underground hydrogen storage in reservoirs: pore-scale mechanisms and optimization of storage capacity and efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    6. Guivarch, Céline & Monjon, Stéphanie, 2017. "Identifying the main uncertainty drivers of energy security in a low-carbon world: The case of Europe," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 530-541.
    7. Zhou, Aitao & Li, Jingwen & Gong, Weili & Wang, Kai & Du, Changang, 2023. "Theoretical and numerical study on the contribution of multi-hole arrangement to coalbed methane extraction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    8. Yang, Gang & Song, Dazhao & Wang, Man & Qiu, Liming & He, Xueqiu & Khan, Majid & Qian, Sun, 2024. "New insights into dynamic disaster monitoring through asynchronous deformation induced coal-gas outburst mechanism of tectonic and raw coal seams," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    9. He, Hengyi & Liu, Peng & Nie, Baisheng & Zhao, Yulong & Wang, Lei & Liu, Xianfeng & Deng, Bozhi & Zhao, Zhengduo & Zhang, Hao & Zhao, Dan & Bao, Song, 2024. "Micromechanical property evolution and damage mechanism of coal subjected to ScCO2 treatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    10. Bauer, Nico & Bosetti, Valentina & Hamdi-Cherif, Meriem & Kitous, Alban & McCollum, David & Méjean, Aurélie & Rao, Shilpa & Turton, Hal & Paroussos, Leonidas & Ashina, Shuichi & Calvin, Katherine & Wa, 2015. "CO2 emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: Dynamic and international aspects of climate policies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PA), pages 243-256.
    11. Capellán-Pérez, Iñigo & Mediavilla, Margarita & de Castro, Carlos & Carpintero, Óscar & Miguel, Luis Javier, 2014. "Fossil fuel depletion and socio-economic scenarios: An integrated approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 641-666.
    12. Xue, Jingyan & Liu, Gengyuan & Casazza, Marco & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2018. "Development of an urban FEW nexus online analyzer to support urban circular economy strategy planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 475-495.
    13. Renaud Coulomb & Fanny Henriet & Léo Reitzmann, 2021. "'Bad' Oil, 'Worse' Oil and Carbon Misallocation," PSE Working Papers halshs-03244647, HAL.
    14. Wei, Jianguang & Zhang, Dong & Zhou, Xiaofeng & Zhou, Runnan & Shamil, Sultanov & Li, Jiangtao & Gayubov, Abdumalik & Hadavimoghaddam, Fahimeh & Chen, Yinghe & Xia, Bing & Fu, Ping & Wang, Yue, 2024. "Characterization of pore structures after ASP flooding for post-EOR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    15. Ritchie, Justin & Dowlatabadi, Hadi, 2017. "The 1000 GtC coal question: Are cases of vastly expanded future coal combustion still plausible?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 16-31.
    16. Jewell, Jessica & Vetier, Marta & Garcia-Cabrera, Daniel, 2019. "The international technological nuclear cooperation landscape: A new dataset and network analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 838-852.
    17. Nyambuu, Unurjargal & Semmler, Willi, 2020. "Climate change and the transition to a low carbon economy – Carbon targets and the carbon budget," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 367-376.
    18. Krey, Volker & Guo, Fei & Kolp, Peter & Zhou, Wenji & Schaeffer, Roberto & Awasthy, Aayushi & Bertram, Christoph & de Boer, Harmen-Sytze & Fragkos, Panagiotis & Fujimori, Shinichiro & He, Chenmin & Iy, 2019. "Looking under the hood: A comparison of techno-economic assumptions across national and global integrated assessment models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1254-1267.
    19. Guo, Haijun & Yu, Yingjie & Wang, Yunhe & Wang, Kai & Yuan, Liang & Xu, Chao & Ren, Bo, 2024. "Experimental study on the desorption law and diffusion kinetic characteristics of gas in raw coal and tectonic coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    20. Masahiro Sugiyama & Osamu Akashi & Kenichi Wada & Amit Kanudia & Jun Li & John Weyant, 2014. "Energy efficiency potentials for global climate change mitigation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 397-411, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:301:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224014750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.