IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i12p3419-d188469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Laboratory Study on Changes in the Pore Structures and Gas Desorption Properties of Intact and Tectonic Coals after Supercritical CO 2 Treatment: Implications for Coalbed Methane Recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Erlei Su

    (State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Yunpei Liang

    (State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Lei Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
    State Key Laboratory of Gas Disaster Monitoring and Emergency Technology, Chongqing 400037, China
    China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Chongqing Research Institute, Chongqing 400037, China)

  • Quanle Zou

    (State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Fanfan Niu

    (Zhengzhou Engineering Co., Ltd. of China Railway Seventh Group, Zhengzhou 450052, China)

Abstract

Tectonic coals in coal seams may affect the process of enhanced coalbed methane recovery with CO 2 sequestration (CO 2 -ECBM). The main objective of this study was to investigate the differences between supercritical CO 2 (ScCO 2 ) and intact and tectonic coals to determine how the ScCO 2 changes the coal’s properties. More specifically, the changes in the tectonic coal’s pore structures and its gas desorption behavior were of particular interest. In this work, mercury intrusion porosimetry, N 2 (77 K) adsorption, and methane desorption experiments were used to identify the difference in pore structures and gas desorption properties between and intact and tectonic coals after ScCO 2 treatment. The experimental results indicate that the total pore volume, specific surface area, and pore connectivity of tectonic coal increased more than intact coal after ScCO 2 treatment, indicating that ScCO 2 had the greatest influence on the pore structure of the tectonic coal. Additionally, ScCO 2 treatment enhanced the diffusivity of tectonic coal more than that of intact coal. This verified the pore structure experimental results. A simplified illustration of the methane migration before and after ScCO 2 treatment was proposed to analyze the influence of ScCO 2 on the tectonic coal reservoir’s CBM. Hence, the results of this study may provide new insights into CO 2 -ECBM in tectonic coal reservoirs.

Suggested Citation

  • Erlei Su & Yunpei Liang & Lei Li & Quanle Zou & Fanfan Niu, 2018. "Laboratory Study on Changes in the Pore Structures and Gas Desorption Properties of Intact and Tectonic Coals after Supercritical CO 2 Treatment: Implications for Coalbed Methane Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:3419-:d:188469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3419/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3419/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gale, John, 2004. "Geological storage of CO2: What do we know, where are the gaps and what more needs to be done?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1329-1338.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Fangfang & Wu, Caifang & Zhang, Xiaodong & Gao, Bin, 2024. "Mechanism of SC-CO2 extraction-induced changes to adsorption heat of tectonic coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    2. Wei, Jiaqi & Su, Erlei & Xu, Guangwei & Yang, Yuqiang & Han, Shuran & Chen, Xiangjun & Chen, Haidong & An, Fenghua, 2024. "Comparative analysis of permeability rebound and recovery of tectonic and intact coal: Implications for coalbed methane recovery in tectonic coal reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lai, N.Y.G. & Yap, E.H. & Lee, C.W., 2011. "Viability of CCS: A broad-based assessment for Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3608-3616.
    2. Afshin Tatar & Amin Shokrollahi & Moonyong Lee & Tomoaki Kashiwao & Alireza Bahadori, 2015. "Prediction of supercritical CO 2 /brine relative permeability in sedimentary basins during carbon dioxide sequestration," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(6), pages 756-771, December.
    3. Nasvi, M.C.M. & Ranjith, P.G. & Sanjayan, J. & Haque, A., 2013. "Sub- and super-critical carbon dioxide permeability of wellbore materials under geological sequestration conditions: An experimental study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 231-239.
    4. Griffin, Paul A. & Jaffe, Amy Myers & Lont, David H. & Dominguez-Faus, Rosa, 2015. "Science and the stock market: Investors' recognition of unburnable carbon," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PA), pages 1-12.
    5. Raziperchikolaee, S. & Alvarado, V. & Yin, S., 2013. "Effect of hydraulic fracturing on long-term storage of CO2 in stimulated saline aquifers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1091-1104.
    6. Dang, Zheng & Wang, Xiaoming & Bie, Shizhen & Su, Xianbo & Hou, Shihui, 2024. "Experimental study of water occurrence in coal under different negative pressure conditions: Implication for CBM productivity during negative pressure drainage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    7. Perera, M.S.A. & Ranjith, P.G. & Choi, S.K. & Airey, D., 2011. "The effects of sub-critical and super-critical carbon dioxide adsorption-induced coal matrix swelling on the permeability of naturally fractured black coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6442-6450.
    8. Mandadige Samintha Anne Perera & Ashani Savinda Ranathunga & Pathegama Gamage Ranjith, 2016. "Effect of Coal Rank on Various Fluid Saturations Creating Mechanical Property Alterations Using Australian Coals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Wang, Jinkai & Feng, Xiaoyong & Wanyan, Qiqi & Zhao, Kai & Wang, Ziji & Pei, Gen & Xie, Jun & Tian, Bo, 2022. "Hysteresis effect of three-phase fluids in the high-intensity injection–production process of sandstone underground gas storages," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    10. Samin Raziperchikolaee & Vivek Singh & Mark Kelley, 2022. "Quantifying the impact of effective stress on changes in elastic wave velocities due to CO2 injection into a depleted carbonate reef," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 12(1), pages 35-47, February.
    11. Pengfei Lv & Yu Liu & Lanlan Jiang & Yongchen Song & Bohao Wu & Jiafei Zhao & Yi Zhang, 2016. "Experimental determination of wettability and heterogeneity effect on CO 2 distribution in porous media," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(3), pages 401-415, June.
    12. Tianran Ma & Jonny Rutqvist & Weiqun Liu & Li Zhu & Kunhwi Kim, 2017. "Modeling of CO 2 sequestration in coal seams: Role of CO 2 ‐induced coal softening on injectivity, storage efficiency and caprock deformation," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 562-578, June.
    13. Ricci, Elena Claire & Bosetti, Valentina & Baker, Erin & Jenni, Karen E., 2014. "From Expert Elicitations to Integrated Assessment: Future Prospects of Carbon Capture Technologies," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 172451, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    14. Zhang, Lisong & Zhang, Shiyan & Jiang, Weizhai & Wang, Zhiyuan & Li, Jing & Bian, Yinghui, 2018. "A mechanism of fluid exchange associated to CO2 leakage along activated fault during geologic storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1178-1190.
    15. Shafaei, Mohammad Javad & Abedi, Jalal & Hassanzadeh, Hassan & Chen, Zhangxin, 2012. "Reverse gas-lift technology for CO2 storage into deep saline aquifers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 840-849.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:3419-:d:188469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.