IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v284y2023ics0360544223027238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of the reaction mechanism for deep reduction hydrogen production using two special steel solid wastes and a chemical looping hydrogen production scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Shuanghui
  • Rui, Qixuan
  • Chen, Zongqi
  • Zhang, Lihui
  • Duan, Feng

Abstract

Pickling sludge (PS) and presintered waste (PW) are two special steel solid wastes that have potential as oxygen carriers due to their Fe content. Using these raw materials to produce hydrogen allows for the resource utilization of solid waste, which has good environmental effects. Here, we studied the deep reduction-hydrogen production characteristics. Specifically, the effects of temperature, papermaking sludge (PMS) blended ratio, and reaction time on the deep reduction characteristics of Fe in pickling sludge and presintered waste were studied. On this basis, the study also aimed to investigate the effects of temperature and PMS blended ratio on hydrogen production. The results indicated that when exposed to high temperature, PMS shows the ability to effectively reduce pickling sludge and presintered waste. The maximum Fe recovery rate can reach 65.63 and 96.94 % in a fixed bed reactor operating at 700 °C and a blended ratio of approximately 10 %. Under the conditions of 900 °C and 15 %/50 % papermaking sludge addition, the Fe content within pickling sludge and presintered waste was reduced to FeCr2O4 and FeO, respectively. Subsequently, during the reaction with steam, Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 were generated in PS and PW, respectively. The hydrogen production per unit mass of Fe2O3 in pickling sludge is higher due to the existence of the FeCr2O4 spinel structure in the reduction product of pickling sludge. According to the above results, two hydrogen production strategies of PS and PW through different deep reduction paths are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Shuanghui & Rui, Qixuan & Chen, Zongqi & Zhang, Lihui & Duan, Feng, 2023. "A comparative study of the reaction mechanism for deep reduction hydrogen production using two special steel solid wastes and a chemical looping hydrogen production scheme," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:284:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223027238
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223027238
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129329?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Xun & Fu, Genshen & Xiao, Bo & Xu, Tingting, 2022. "Optimization of nickel-iron bimetallic oxides for coproduction of hydrogen and syngas in chemical looping reforming with water splitting process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ding, Haoran & Tong, Sirui & Qi, Zhifu & Liu, Fei & Sun, Shien & Han, Long, 2023. "Syngas production from chemical-looping steam methane reforming: The effect of channel geometry on BaCoO3/CeO2 monolithic oxygen carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    2. Ding, Haoran & Liu, Shenghui & Liu, Fei & Han, Long & Sun, Shien & Qi, Zhifu, 2024. "Experimental and numerical investigation of chemical-loop steam methane reforming on monolithic BaCoO3/CeO2 oxygen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:284:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223027238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.