IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v256y2022ics0360544222016127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantum chemistry simulation and kinetic analysis of organic nitrogen transfer during oil shale pyrolysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Bin
  • Zhou, Chenyu
  • Qin, Lianggen
  • Fan, Kexin
  • Xue, Jiewen
  • Guo, Yun

Abstract

The nitrogen in oil shale would cause the generation of heteroatomic compounds during the pyrolysis, causing fuel instability, viscosity increase, glue formation and discoloration. To explore the formation mechanism of the nitrogenous substances, the relevant reaction paths and the corresponding kinetic analysis during the pyrolysis were constructed and conducted in this paper. Through quantum chemical transition state theory combing with density functional theory, the energy of reactants, transition states and intermediates involving in the reaction was obtained. Moreover, the energy distribution diagrams were also constructed to further clarify the formation mechanism of typical organic nitrogen product. In the exist of some functional groups like hydroxy, the N-containing rings such as pyrrole and pyridine are more easily to be opened, generating NH3 and NO. Five kinds of pathways constructed by this paper were chosen as the representational paths for revealing the micro theoretical mechanism of organic nitrogen conversion in oil shale. The results could provide reliable theoretical basis for investigating the conversion mechanism of nitrogen in oil shale pyrolysis and further reducing the NOx emission in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Bin & Zhou, Chenyu & Qin, Lianggen & Fan, Kexin & Xue, Jiewen & Guo, Yun, 2022. "Quantum chemistry simulation and kinetic analysis of organic nitrogen transfer during oil shale pyrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:256:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222016127
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222016127
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Lu & Ma, Yue & Tan, Ting & Yue, Changtao & Li, Shuyuan & Tang, Xun, 2021. "Mechanisms of sulfur and nitrogen transformation during Longkou oil shale pyrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    2. Greene, David L. & Hopson, Janet L. & Li, Jia, 2006. "Have we run out of oil yet? Oil peaking analysis from an optimist's perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 515-531, March.
    3. Owen, Nick A. & Inderwildi, Oliver R. & King, David A., 2010. "The status of conventional world oil reserves--Hype or cause for concern?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4743-4749, August.
    4. Yu, Zhaosheng & Dai, Minquan & Huang, Manman & Fang, Shiwen & Xu, Jiachen & Lin, Yan & Ma, Xiaoqian, 2018. "Catalytic characteristics of the fast pyrolysis of microalgae over oil shale: Analytical Py-GC/MS study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 465-471.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu, Wei & Liu, Chao & Tan, Luxi & Li, Qibin & Xin, Liyong & Wang, Shukun, 2023. "Thermal stability and thermal decomposition mechanism of octamethyltrisiloxane (MDM): Combined experiment, ReaxFF-MD and DFT study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hosseini, Seyed Hossein & Shakouri G., Hamed, 2016. "A study on the future of unconventional oil development under different oil price scenarios: A system dynamics approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 64-74.
    2. Sena, Marcelo Fonseca Monteiro de & Rosa, Luiz Pinguelli & Szklo, Alexandre, 2013. "Will Venezuelan extra-heavy oil be a significant source of petroleum in the next decades?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 51-59.
    3. Haugom, Erik & Mydland, Ørjan & Pichler, Alois, 2016. "Long term oil prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 84-94.
    4. Atanu Ghoshray & Issam Malki, 2021. "The share of the global energy mix: Signs of convergence?," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 34-50, January.
    5. Desmond Batsa Dorhjie & Elena Mukhina & Anton Kasyanenko & Alexey Cheremisin, 2023. "Tight and Shale Oil Exploration: A Review of the Global Experience and a Case of West Siberia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-28, September.
    6. Malik Curuk & Suphi Sen, 2023. "Climate Policy and Resource Extraction with Variable Markups and Imperfect Substitutes," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(4), pages 1091-1120.
    7. Grinets, Irina & Kaznacheev, Peter, 2014. "The Role of Innovative Development in Unconventional Hydrocarbon Exploitation in the Context of the Shale Gas Revolution in the USA," Published Papers kazn02, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    8. Shahbeig, Hossein & Nosrati, Mohsen, 2020. "Pyrolysis of municipal sewage sludge for bioenergy production: Thermo-kinetic studies, evolved gas analysis, and techno-socio-economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Dahl, Roy Endré & Lorentzen, Sindre & Oglend, Atle & Osmundsen, Petter, 2017. "Pro-cyclical petroleum investments and cost overruns in Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 68-78.
    10. Kerschner, Christian & Hubacek, Klaus, 2009. "Assessing the suitability of input–output analysis for enhancing our understanding of potential economic effects of Peak Oil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 284-290.
    11. Jashim Uddin Ahmed & Hafiza Sultana & Md. Muinuddin Khan, 2018. "Saudi Aramco: A Blend between Profit and Politics," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 7(2), pages 88-99, June.
    12. Santagata, R. & Ripa, M. & Ulgiati, S., 2017. "An environmental assessment of electricity production from slaughterhouse residues. Linking urban, industrial and waste management systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P2), pages 175-188.
    13. Smith, James L., 2012. "On the portents of peak oil (and other indicators of resource scarcity)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 68-78.
    14. John S. Hill & Myung-Su Chae & Jinseo Park, 2012. "The Effects of Geography and Infrastructure on Economic Development and International Business Involvement," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 4(2), pages 91-113, December.
    15. Yang, Guangfei & Li, Xianneng & Wang, Jianliang & Lian, Lian & Ma, Tieju, 2015. "Modeling oil production based on symbolic regression," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 48-61.
    16. Warrilow, David, 2015. "A bumpy road to the top: Statistically defining a peak in oil production," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 81-84.
    17. Jaume Belles‐Sampera & Montserrat Guillén & Miguel Santolino, 2014. "Beyond Value‐at‐Risk: GlueVaR Distortion Risk Measures," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(1), pages 121-134, January.
    18. Okullo, Samuel J. & Reynès, Frédéric, 2011. "Can reserve additions in mature crude oil provinces attenuate peak oil?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 5755-5764.
    19. Heun, Matthew Kuperus & de Wit, Martin, 2012. "Energy return on (energy) invested (EROI), oil prices, and energy transitions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 147-158.
    20. Kirk Hamilton & Giles Atkinson, 2013. "Resource Discoveries, Learning and National Income Accounting," GRI Working Papers 117, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:256:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222016127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.