IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v237y2021ics0360544221018429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic analysis of different straw supply modes in China

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Juanjuan
  • Zhang, Jian
  • Yi, Weiming
  • Cai, Hongzhen
  • Su, Zhanpeng
  • Li, Yang

Abstract

Choosing an appropriate straw supply mode is crucial for reducing straw supply costs. This study considers four different supply modes: Farmer-Factory mode, Farmer-Broker-Factory mode, Farmer-Centralized Storage Site-Factory mode, and Farmer-Broker-Centralized Storage Site-Factory mode. Comparing the advantages and disadvantages and economic analysis of each mode are conducted. It is found that straw collection includes artificial and mechanized collection, straw transportation includes tractor and truck transportation, straw storage includes open field storage and centralized storage sites. When collecting 100,000 tons of straw, ordering the different supply modes based on cost result an order (from high to low) of 1A, 3, 2A, 1B, 4, 2B, ordering them based on equipment demand result in an order (from high to low) of 1A, 3, 2A, 1B, 2B, 4, and ordering them based on labor demand result in an order (from high to low) of 1A, 3, 2A, 1B, 4, 2B. It also can be seen that collection cost, transportation cost, and loading and unloading costs are important components of supply cost for each mode. Through the analysis of the six modes, mechanized baling collection can significantly reduce supply cost and equipment and labor requirements. Although intermediate links are added, mode 4 has become an economical supply mode that is also suitable for large-scale straw utilization due to its mechanized operations. As a conclusion, it will likely be the main straw supply mode of the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Juanjuan & Zhang, Jian & Yi, Weiming & Cai, Hongzhen & Su, Zhanpeng & Li, Yang, 2021. "Economic analysis of different straw supply modes in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:237:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221018429
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221018429
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121594?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suramaythangkoor, Tritib & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2010. "Potential alternatives of heat and power technology application using rice straw in Thailand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 128-133, January.
    2. Qiang Wang & Thomas Dogot & Xianlei Huang & Linna Fang & Changbin Yin, 2020. "Coupling of Rural Energy Structure and Straw Utilization: Based on Cases in Hebei, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Cheng, Guishi & Zhao, Ying & Pan, Shijiu & Wang, Xiaoqiang & Dong, Changqing, 2020. "A comparative life cycle analysis of wheat straw utilization modes in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    4. Sun, Yufeng & Cai, Wenchao & Chen, Bo & Guo, Xueying & Hu, Jianjun & Jiao, Youzhou, 2017. "Economic analysis of fuel collection, storage, and transportation in straw power generation in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 194-203.
    5. Chen, Xiaoguang, 2016. "Economic potential of biomass supply from crop residues in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 141-149.
    6. Lin, Boqiang & He, Jiaxin, 2017. "Is biomass power a good choice for governments in China?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1218-1230.
    7. Zhang, Gaijing & Long, Weiding, 2010. "A key review on emergy analysis and assessment of biomass resources for a sustainable future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 2948-2955, June.
    8. Royo, Javier & Sebastián, Fernando & García-Galindo, Daniel & Gómez, Maider & Díaz, Maryori, 2012. "Large-scale analysis of GHG (greenhouse gas) reduction by means of biomass co-firing at country-scale: Application to the Spanish case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 255-267.
    9. Zamar, David S. & Gopaluni, Bhushan & Sokhansanj, Shahab, 2017. "Optimization of sawmill residues collection for bioenergy production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 487-495.
    10. Sosa, Amanda & Acuna, Mauricio & McDonnell, Kevin & Devlin, Ger, 2015. "Controlling moisture content and truck configurations to model and optimise biomass supply chain logistics in Ireland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 338-351.
    11. Cho, Seolhee & Kim, Jiyong, 2019. "Multi-site and multi-period optimization model for strategic planning of a renewable hydrogen energy network from biomass waste and energy crops," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 527-540.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Tao & Wuliyasu Bai & Rongsheng Peng & Ziying Wu, 2024. "Sustainable Regional Straw Utilization: Collaborative Approaches and Network Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Ru Fang, Yan & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Shi, Wenjun & Hui Xie, Guang, 2022. "Sustainable development in China: Valuation of bioenergy potential and CO2 reduction from crop straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    3. Jia Mao & Shiqi Zhang & Jin Liu, 2024. "Straw Logistics Network Optimization Considering Cost Importance and Carbon Emission under the Concept of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-32, July.
    4. See, Justin & Cuaton, Ginbert Permejo & Placino, Pryor & Vunibola, Suliasi & Thi, Huong Do & Dombroski, Kelly & McKinnon, Katharine, 2024. "From absences to emergences: Foregrounding traditional and Indigenous climate change adaptation knowledges and practices from Fiji, Vietnam and the Philippines," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Bin Yang & Weiguo Jia & Yi Yu & Hui Zhang, 2024. "Sustainability Assessment of Agricultural Waste Biogas Production System in China Based on Emergy and Carbon Evaluation Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Juanjuan & Zhang, Jian & Yi, Weiming & Cai, Hongzhen & Li, Yang & Su, Zhanpeng, 2022. "Agri-biomass supply chain optimization in north China: Model development and application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    2. Guo, Jian-Xin & Tan, Xianchun & Gu, Baihe & Zhu, Kaiwei, 2022. "Integration of supply chain management of hybrid biomass power plant with carbon capture and storage operation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1055-1065.
    3. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2018. "Biomass logistics: A review of important features, optimization modeling and the new trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 587-599.
    4. Juanjuan Wu & Jian Zhang & Weiming Yi & Hongzhen Cai & Yang Li & Zhanpeng Su, 2021. "A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Incentive Effects for Agribiomass Power Generation Supply Chain in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Murphy, Fionnuala & Sosa, Amanda & McDonnell, Kevin & Devlin, Ger, 2016. "Life cycle assessment of biomass-to-energy systems in Ireland modelled with biomass supply chain optimisation based on greenhouse gas emission reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1040-1055.
    6. Liu, Beibei & Wu, Qiaoran & Wang, Feng & Zhang, Bing, 2019. "Is straw return-to-field always beneficial? Evidence from an integrated cost-benefit analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 393-402.
    7. Zhanwu Wang & Guangyin Xu & Zhenfeng Wang & Zhiping Zhang, 2022. "Sustainability of agricultural waste power generation industry in China: criteria relationship identification and policy design mechanism," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3371-3395, March.
    8. Paredes-Sánchez, José P. & García-Elcoro, Víctor E. & Rosillo-Calle, Frank & Xiberta-Bernat, Jorge, 2016. "Assessment of forest bioenergy potential in a coal-producing area in Asturias (Spain) and recommendations for setting up a Biomass Logistic Centre (BLC)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 133-141.
    9. Shafie, S.M. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Masjuki, H.H., 2013. "Life cycle assessment of rice straw co-firing with coal power generation in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 284-294.
    10. Yang Yang & Ji-Qin Ni & Weiqing Bao & Lei Zhao & Guang Hui Xie, 2019. "Potential Reductions in Greenhouse Gas and Fine Particulate Matter Emissions Using Corn Stover for Ethanol Production in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, September.
    11. Weng, Yuwei & Chang, Shiyan & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2019. "Exploring the impacts of biofuel expansion on land use change and food security based on a land explicit CGE model: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 514-525.
    12. Eyni-Nargeseh, Hamed & Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza & Rahimi-Moghaddam, Sajjad & Gilani, Abdolali & Damghani, Abdolmajid Mahdavi & Azizi, Khosro, 2023. "Which rice farming system is more environmentally friendly in Khuzestan province, Iran? A study based on emergy analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    13. Maung, Thein A. & McCarl, Bruce A., 2013. "Economic factors influencing potential use of cellulosic crop residues for electricity generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 81-91.
    14. Sui, Haiqing & Chen, Jianfeng & Cheng, Wei & Zhu, Youjian & Zhang, Wennan & Hu, Junhao & Jiang, Hao & Shao, Jing'ai & Chen, Hanping, 2024. "Effect of oxidative torrefaction on fuel and pelletizing properties of agricultural biomass in comparison with non-oxidative torrefaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    15. Chai, Li & Saffron, Christopher M., 2016. "Comparing pelletization and torrefaction depots: Optimization of depot capacity and biomass moisture to determine the minimum production cost," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 387-395.
    16. Liu, Liwei & Ye, Junhong & Zhao, Yufei & Zhao, Erdong, 2015. "The plight of the biomass power generation industry in China – A supply chain risk perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 680-692.
    17. Zuo, Alec & Hou, Lingling & Huang, Zeying, 2020. "How does farmers' current usage of crop straws influence the willingness-to-accept price to sell?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Delivand, Mitra Kami & Barz, Mirko & Gheewala, Shabbir H. & Sajjakulnukit, Boonrod, 2011. "Economic feasibility assessment of rice straw utilization for electricity generating through combustion in Thailand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3651-3658.
    19. Yuanyuan He & Luxin Wan & Manli Zhang & Huijuan Zhao, 2022. "Regional Renewable Energy Installation Optimization Strategies with Renewable Portfolio Standards in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Kuhn, L. & Hou, L. & Chen, X. & Huang, J., 2018. "Agricultural machinery for cleaner air An analysis of the effectiveness of three policy measures for reducing residue burning in Northern China," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277374, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:237:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221018429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.