IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v234y2021ics0360544221014900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization-based analysis of decarbonization pathways and flexibility requirements in highly renewable power systems

Author

Listed:
  • Verástegui, Felipe
  • Lorca, Álvaro
  • Olivares, Daniel
  • Negrete-Pincetic, Matias

Abstract

Several countries are adopting plans to reduce the contaminant emissions from the energy sector through renewable energy integration and restrictions on fossil fuel generation. This process poses important computational and methodological challenges on expansion planning modeling due to the operational details needed for a proper analysis. In this context, this paper develops a planning model including an effective representation of the operational aspects of the system to understand the key role of flexible resources under strong decarbonization processes in highly renewable power systems. A case study is developed for the Chilean power system, which is currently undergoing an ambitious coal phase-out process, including the analysis of a scenario that leads to a completely renewable generation mix. The results show that highly renewable generation mixes are feasible, but rely on an effective balance of the key flexibility attributes of the system including ramping, storage, and transmission capacities. Further, such balance allows for faster decarbonization goals to remain in a similar cost range, through the deployment of flexible capacity in earlier stages of the planning horizon.

Suggested Citation

  • Verástegui, Felipe & Lorca, Álvaro & Olivares, Daniel & Negrete-Pincetic, Matias, 2021. "Optimization-based analysis of decarbonization pathways and flexibility requirements in highly renewable power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:234:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221014900
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221014900
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schaber, Katrin & Steinke, Florian & Hamacher, Thomas, 2012. "Transmission grid extensions for the integration of variable renewable energies in Europe: Who benefits where?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 123-135.
    2. Poncelet, Kris & Delarue, Erik & D’haeseleer, William, 2020. "Unit commitment constraints in long-term planning models: Relevance, pitfalls and the role of assumptions on flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    3. Morales-España, Germán & Ramírez-Elizondo, Laura & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2017. "Hidden power system inflexibilities imposed by traditional unit commitment formulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 223-238.
    4. Li, Canbing & Shi, Haiqing & Cao, Yijia & Wang, Jianhui & Kuang, Yonghong & Tan, Yi & Wei, Jing, 2015. "Comprehensive review of renewable energy curtailment and avoidance: A specific example in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1067-1079.
    5. Paul L Joskow, 2019. "Challenges for wholesale electricity markets with intermittent renewable generation at scale: the US experience," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 35(2), pages 291-331.
    6. L.J. De Vries and R.A. Verzijlbergh, 2018. "How Renewable Energy is Reshaping Europes Electricity Market Design," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    7. Mena, R. & Escobar, R. & Lorca, Á. & Negrete-Pincetic, M. & Olivares, D., 2019. "The impact of concentrated solar power in electric power systems: A Chilean case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 258-283.
    8. Badakhshan, Sobhan & Hajibandeh, Neda & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João.P.S., 2019. "Impact of solar energy on the integrated operation of electricity-gas grids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 844-853.
    9. Hemmati, Reza & Saboori, Hedayat & Siano, Pierluigi, 2017. "Coordinated short-term scheduling and long-term expansion planning in microgrids incorporating renewable energy resources and energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 699-708.
    10. Nelson, James & Johnston, Josiah & Mileva, Ana & Fripp, Matthias & Hoffman, Ian & Petros-Good, Autumn & Blanco, Christian & Kammen, Daniel M., 2012. "High-resolution modeling of the western North American power system demonstrates low-cost and low-carbon futures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 436-447.
    11. Sharan, Ishan & Balasubramanian, R., 2012. "Integrated generation and transmission expansion planning including power and fuel transportation constraints," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 275-284.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bojana Škrbić & Željko Đurišić, 2023. "Novel Planning Methodology for Spatially Optimized RES Development Which Minimizes Flexibility Requirements for Their Integration into the Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-34, April.
    2. Maulén, Lucas & Castro, Margarita & Lorca, Álvaro & Negrete-Pincetic, Matías, 2023. "Optimization-based expansion planning for power and hydrogen systems with feedback from a unit commitment model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    3. Pavel Atănăsoae & Radu Dumitru Pentiuc & Laurențiu Dan Milici, 2022. "Opportunity Analysis of Cogeneration and Trigeneration Solutions: An Application in the Case of a Drug Factory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-27, April.
    4. Bibi Ibrahim & Luis Rabelo & Alfonso T. Sarmiento & Edgar Gutierrez-Franco, 2023. "A Holistic Approach to Power Systems Using Innovative Machine Learning and System Dynamics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-29, July.
    5. Jia Liang & Yongpei Wang, 2024. "Recognizing the nexus between grid infrastructure, renewable energy, net interregional transmission and carbon emissions: Evidence from China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), March.
    6. Castillejo-Cuberos, A. & Cardemil, J.M. & Escobar, R., 2023. "Techno-economic assessment of photovoltaic plants considering high temporal resolution and non-linear dynamics of battery storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    7. Pombo, Daniel Vázquez & Martinez-Rico, Jon & Spataru, Sergiu V. & Bindner, Henrik W. & Sørensen, Poul E., 2023. "Decarbonizing energy islands with flexibility-enabling planning: The case of Santiago, Cape Verde," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    8. Zhang, Xuehan & Son, Yongju & Cheong, Taesu & Choi, Sungyun, 2022. "Affine-arithmetic-based microgrid interval optimization considering uncertainty and battery energy storage system degradation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    9. Lin, Wei & Jiang, Hua & Jian, Haojun & Xue, Jingwei & Wu, Jianghua & Wang, Chongyu & Lin, Zhenjia, 2023. "High-dimension tie-line security regions for renewable accommodations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    10. Wang, Sen & Li, Fengting & Zhang, Gaohang & Yin, Chunya, 2023. "Analysis of energy storage demand for peak shaving and frequency regulation of power systems with high penetration of renewable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    11. Xie, Rui & Wei, Wei & Li, Mingxuan & Dong, ZhaoYang & Mei, Shengwei, 2023. "Sizing capacities of renewable generation, transmission, and energy storage for low-carbon power systems: A distributionally robust optimization approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    12. D'Agostino, D. & Minichiello, F. & Petito, F. & Renno, C. & Valentino, A., 2022. "Retrofit strategies to obtain a NZEB using low enthalpy geothermal energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    13. Brumana, Giovanni & Franchini, Giuseppe & Ghirardi, Elisa & Perdichizzi, Antonio, 2022. "Techno-economic optimization of hybrid power generation systems: A renewables community case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    14. Weiwei Chen & Yibo Wang & Jia Zhang & Wei Dou & Yaxuan Jiao, 2022. "Planning and Energy–Economy–Environment–Security Evaluation Methods for Municipal Energy Systems in China under Targets of Peak Carbon Emissions and Carbon Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    15. Carlos Roberto de Sousa Costa & Paula Ferreira, 2023. "A Review on the Internalization of Externalities in Electricity Generation Expansion Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Tan, Xiaoqiang & Li, Chaoshun & Liu, Dong & Wang, He & Xu, Rongli & Lu, Xueding & Zhu, Zhiwei, 2023. "Multi-time scale model reduction strategy of variable-speed pumped storage unit grid-connected system for small-signal oscillation stability analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 985-1009.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Villalobos, Cristian & Negrete-Pincetic, Matías & Figueroa, Nicolás & Lorca, Álvaro & Olivares, Daniel, 2021. "The impact of short-term pricing on flexible generation investments in electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Frew, Bethany A. & Becker, Sarah & Dvorak, Michael J. & Andresen, Gorm B. & Jacobson, Mark Z., 2016. "Flexibility mechanisms and pathways to a highly renewable US electricity future," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 65-78.
    4. Rodriguez, Rolando A. & Becker, Sarah & Greiner, Martin, 2015. "Cost-optimal design of a simplified, highly renewable pan-European electricity system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 658-668.
    5. Thomas, Austin & Racherla, Pavan, 2020. "Constructing statutory energy goal compliant wind and solar PV infrastructure pathways," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1-19.
    6. Becker, Sarah & Frew, Bethany A. & Andresen, Gorm B. & Zeyer, Timo & Schramm, Stefan & Greiner, Martin & Jacobson, Mark Z., 2014. "Features of a fully renewable US electricity system: Optimized mixes of wind and solar PV and transmission grid extensions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 443-458.
    7. Luis Montero & Antonio Bello & Javier Reneses, 2020. "A New Methodology to Obtain a Feasible Thermal Operation in Power Systems in a Medium-Term Horizon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Feng, Chenjia & Shao, Chengcheng & Wang, Xifan, 2021. "CSP clustering in unit commitment for power system production cost modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1217-1228.
    9. Lehmann, Paul & Ammermann, Kathrin & Gawel, Erik & Geiger, Charlotte & Hauck, Jennifer & Heilmann, Jörg & Meier, Jan-Niklas & Ponitka, Jens & Schicketanz, Sven & Stemmer, Boris & Tafarte, Philip & Thr, 2021. "Managing spatial sustainability trade-offs: The case of wind power," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    10. Gacitua, L. & Gallegos, P. & Henriquez-Auba, R. & Lorca, Á. & Negrete-Pincetic, M. & Olivares, D. & Valenzuela, A. & Wenzel, G., 2018. "A comprehensive review on expansion planning: Models and tools for energy policy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 346-360.
    11. Lehmann, Paul & Ammermann, Kathrin & Gawel, Erik & Geiger, Charlotte & Hauck, Jennifer & Heilmann, Jörg & Meier, Jan-Niklas & Ponitka, Jens & Schicketanz, Sven & Stemmer, Boris & Tafarte, Philip & Thr, 2020. "Managing spatial sustainability trade-offs: The case of wind power," UFZ Discussion Papers 4/2020, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    12. Heuberger, Clara F. & Bains, Praveen K. & Mac Dowell, Niall, 2020. "The EV-olution of the power system: A spatio-temporal optimisation model to investigate the impact of electric vehicle deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    13. Oliva H., Sebastian & Muñoz, Juan & Fredes, Felipe & Sauma, Enzo, 2022. "Impact of increasing transmission capacity for a massive integration of renewable energy on the energy and environmental value of distributed generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 524-534.
    14. Nycander, Elis & Morales-España, Germán & Söder, Lennart, 2022. "Power-based modelling of renewable variability in dispatch models with clustered time periods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 944-956.
    15. Bojana Škrbić & Željko Đurišić, 2023. "Novel Planning Methodology for Spatially Optimized RES Development Which Minimizes Flexibility Requirements for Their Integration into the Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-34, April.
    16. Zhang, Menghan & Yang, Zhifang & Lin, Wei & Yu, Juan & Dai, Wei & Du, Ershun, 2021. "Enhancing economics of power systems through fast unit commitment with high time resolution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    17. Simshauser, Paul, 2024. "On static vs. dynamic line ratings in renewable energy zones," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    18. Otsuki, Takashi & Mohd Isa, Aishah Binti & Samuelson, Ralph D., 2016. "Electric power grid interconnections in Northeast Asia: A quantitative analysis of opportunities and challenges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 311-329.
    19. Alimou, Yacine & Maïzi, Nadia & Bourmaud, Jean-Yves & Li, Marion, 2020. "Assessing the security of electricity supply through multi-scale modeling: The TIMES-ANTARES linking approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    20. Luis Montero & Antonio Bello & Javier Reneses, 2022. "A Review on the Unit Commitment Problem: Approaches, Techniques, and Resolution Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-40, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:234:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221014900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.