IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v199y2020ics0360544220304710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electricity and hydrogen co-production via scramjet multi-expansion open cooling cycle coupled with a PEM electrolyzer

Author

Listed:
  • Seyedmatin, Pourya
  • Karimian, Saeed
  • Rostamzadeh, Hadi
  • Amidpour, Majid

Abstract

A scramjet multi-stage open cooling cycle for co-production of electricity and hydrogen is proposed here in which the fuel of the scramjet is used as coolant of the cooling cycle. Energy and exergy analysis of the devised system are conducted to evaluate the performance of the system and the effects of multi-expansion deliberation. In this integrated system, the waste heat of the scramjet cooling cycle drives the power sub-cycle in which a portion of the overall produced power supplies the required electricity of the proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer for hydrogen production. The results indicated that a four-stage open cooling cycle can be the best scenario in terms of providing more cooling capacity, electricity, and H2 production as well as a reasonable investment cost of its turbines. However, in the case when weight and size of the proposed cogeneration system are very important, a two-stage open cooling cycle can be appropriate. For the fuel mass flow rate of 0.4 kg/s and freestream condition of MaA=6, TA = 223 K and PA = 2.5 kPa, the cooling capacity, net electricity, and hydrogen production of the proposed system with four stages are computed 11.167 MW, 4.48 MW and 55.23 kg/h, respectively. On the other hand, the exergy results showed that PEM electrolyzer has the highest exergy destruction ratio by 70.66% among different components of the set-up. Moreover, the results of exergy analysis exhibited that employing the concept of multi-expansion outstandingly reduces the overall exergy destruction of the system. In this case, the energy and exergy efficiencies of the overall set-up (four stages) are computed 14.07% and 17.44%, respectively. The results of parametric evaluation demonstrated that increasing the back pressure of pump leads to more electricity and hydrogen production. But, increasing the mass flow rate of fuel hasn’t any tangible impact on energy and exergy efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyedmatin, Pourya & Karimian, Saeed & Rostamzadeh, Hadi & Amidpour, Majid, 2020. "Electricity and hydrogen co-production via scramjet multi-expansion open cooling cycle coupled with a PEM electrolyzer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:199:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220304710
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220304710
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Duo & Qin, Jiang & Feng, Yu & Ren, Fengzhi & Bao, Wen, 2014. "Performance evaluation of power generation system with fuel vapor turbine onboard hydrocarbon fueled scramjets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 732-741.
    2. Baroutaji, Ahmad & Wilberforce, Tabbi & Ramadan, Mohamad & Olabi, Abdul Ghani, 2019. "Comprehensive investigation on hydrogen and fuel cell technology in the aviation and aerospace sectors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 31-40.
    3. Yang, Qingchun & Chang, Juntao & Bao, Wen, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis on specific thrust of the hydrocarbon fueled scramjet," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 552-558.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Makhsoos, Ashkan & Kandidayeni, Mohsen & Boulon, Loïc & Pollet, Bruno G., 2023. "A comparative analysis of single and modular proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers for green hydrogen production- a case study in Trois-Rivières," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    2. Ambe Verma, Kumari & Murari Pandey, Krishna & Ray, Mukul & Kumar Sharma, Kaushal, 2021. "Effect of transverse fuel injection system on combustion efficiency in scramjet combustor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    3. Fengyuan Yan & Xiaolong Han & Qianwei Cheng & Yamin Yan & Qi Liao & Yongtu Liang, 2022. "Scenario-Based Comparative Analysis for Coupling Electricity and Hydrogen Storage in Clean Oilfield Energy Supply System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Abdollahipour, Armin & Sayyaadi, Hoseyn, 2022. "Optimal design of a hybrid power generation system based on integrating PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer as a moderator for micro-renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng, Yu & Liu, Yuna & Cao, Yong & Gong, Keyu & Liu, Shuyuan & Qin, Jiang, 2020. "Thermal management evaluation for advanced aero-engines using catalytic steam reforming of hydrocarbon fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Qin, Jiang & Cheng, Kunlin & Zhang, Silong & Zhang, Duo & Bao, Wen & Han, Jiecai, 2016. "Analysis of energy cascade utilization in a chemically recuperated scramjet with indirect combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1100-1106.
    3. Zhang, Duo & Yang, Shengbo & Zhang, Silong & Qin, Jiang & Bao, Wen, 2015. "Thermodynamic analysis on optimum performance of scramjet engine at high Mach numbers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 1046-1054.
    4. Lu, Guolong & Fan, Wenxuan & Lu, Dafeng & Zhao, Taotao & Wu, Qianqian & Liu, Mingxin & Liu, Zhenning, 2024. "Lung-inspired hybrid flow field to enhance PEMFC performance: A case of dual optimization by response surface and artificial intelligence," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    5. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Homes of the future: Unpacking public perceptions to power the domestic hydrogen transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    6. Ki-Hoon Kim & Min-Seung Jo & Sung-Ho Kim & Bokyeong Kim & Joonhee Kang & Jun-Bo Yoon & Min-Ho Seo, 2024. "Long-term reliable wireless H2 gas sensor via repeatable thermal refreshing of palladium nanowire," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    7. John Vourdoubas, 2021. "Is the De-carbonization of Air-transportation to and from the Island of Crete, Greece Feasible?," Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 62-75, August.
    8. Michel Noussan & Pier Paolo Raimondi & Rossana Scita & Manfred Hafner, 2020. "The Role of Green and Blue Hydrogen in the Energy Transition—A Technological and Geopolitical Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Alina E. Kozhukhova & Stephanus P. du Preez & Dmitri G. Bessarabov, 2021. "Catalytic Hydrogen Combustion for Domestic and Safety Applications: A Critical Review of Catalyst Materials and Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    10. Yao, Jing & Wu, Zhen & Wang, Huan & Yang, Fusheng & Xuan, Jin & Xing, Lei & Ren, Jianwei & Zhang, Zaoxiao, 2022. "Design and multi-objective optimization of low-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells with efficient water recovery and high electrochemical performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    11. Xu, Qing & Li, Haowei & Feng, Yaoxun & Li, Xiaoning & Ling, Changming & Zhou, Chaoying & Qin, Jiang, 2020. "Dynamic thermo-physical characteristics of high temperature gaseous hydrocarbon fuel thermal power generation for regeneratively cooled hypersonic propulsion system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    12. Siddiqui, O. & Dincer, I., 2021. "A comparative life cycle assessment of clean aviation fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    13. Olabi, A.G. & Wilberforce, Tabbi & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali, 2021. "Fuel cell application in the automotive industry and future perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    14. Abdul Ghani Olabi & Tabbi Wilberforce & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Mohamad Ramadan, 2021. "Critical Review of Flywheel Energy Storage System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-33, April.
    15. Cheng, Kunlin & Qin, Jiang & Zhang, Duo & Bao, Wen & Jing, Wuxing, 2022. "Performance evaluation for a combined power generation system of closed-Brayton-cycle and thermoelectric generator with finite cold source at room temperature on hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    16. Jingna Kou & Wei Li & Rui Zhang & Dingxiong Shi, 2023. "Hydrogen as a Transition Tool in a Fossil Fuel Resource Region: Taking China’s Coal Capital Shanxi as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, August.
    17. Ahmad Baroutaji & Arun Arjunan & John Robinson & Tabbi Wilberforce & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Abdul Ghani Olabi, 2021. "PEMFC Poly-Generation Systems: Developments, Merits, and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    18. Tabbi Wilberforce & Abdul Ghani Olabi, 2020. "Performance Prediction of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFC) Using Adaptive Neuro Inference System (ANFIS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Arnob Das & Susmita Datta Peu, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Recent Advancements in Thermochemical Processes for Clean Hydrogen Production to Decarbonize the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-42, September.
    20. Tobias Mueller & Steven Gronau, 2023. "Fostering Macroeconomic Research on Hydrogen-Powered Aviation: A Systematic Literature Review on General Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-33, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:199:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220304710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.