IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v189y2019ics0360544219319279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantification of the near-surface wind conditions of the African coast: A comparative approach (satellite, NCEP CFSR and WRF-based)

Author

Listed:
  • Olaofe, Z.O.

Abstract

The temporal and spatial variations of the near-surface wind conditions across the African coast are enormous due to local flow perturbations from changes in sea surface roughness or/and the weather system processes driven mainly by the Atlantic and Indian Ocean Currents. Over the past decades, the patterns of the near surface wind speed and directional flow have significantly changed across the globe. To quantify the long-term changes of the surface wind conditions off the African coasts, the spatial distributions of historical wind climates and analyzed surface temperature from remote sensing and two atmospheric models are presented. Thus, the offshore wind conditions variability derived across 4 coastal zones are quantified through a comparative approach. Over period of 2001–2010, the trends of regional-scale wind conditions from the numerical model of NCEP CFSR and satellite observations of CCMP are assessed. For identification of geographical viable locations with concentrated energy resource and negative temperature gradient, the surface wind conditions are adjusted to offshore turbine generator (V80 2 MW) operating height of 100 m. Based on statistical evaluation of the offshore wind condition, graphical representations of the historical wind climate are presented. Furthermore, the monthly and seasonal sectorwise winds at 10 and 100 m ASL for 2002 are compared in determining how local perturbations had caused a drift in offshore wind flows within the boundary height of 100 m. On local-scale evaluation, the near-surface wind conditions derived from WRF are validated with NCEP and CCMP datasets. The long-term historical wind conditions in time and space revealed that the satellite, WRF and NCEP models are reliable tools in replication of the coastal wind conditions across the coasts of Africa. Results also indicate the southeast coast to be an energetic region with concentrated mean wind energy flux between 300 and 1580 W/m2 (8.10–13.70 m/s), but subjects to coastal variations of strong weather processes. No persistent wind pattern was found when considering the variability of near-surface wind conditions from a low to high latitude.

Suggested Citation

  • Olaofe, Z.O., 2019. "Quantification of the near-surface wind conditions of the African coast: A comparative approach (satellite, NCEP CFSR and WRF-based)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:189:y:2019:i:c:s0360544219319279
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219319279
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Perera-Perez, Javier & Borge-Diez, David & dePalacio-Rodríguez, Carlos, 2016. "Offshore wind energy: A review of the current status, challenges and future development in Spain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-18.
    2. Johansson, Bengt, 2013. "Security aspects of future renewable energy systems–A short overview," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 598-605.
    3. Wachsmuth, J. & Blohm, A. & Gößling-Reisemann, S. & Eickemeier, T. & Ruth, M. & Gasper, R. & Stührmann, S., 2013. "How will renewable power generation be affected by climate change? The case of a Metropolitan Region in Northwest Germany," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 192-201.
    4. Li, Delei & Geyer, Beate & Bisling, Peter, 2016. "A model-based climatology analysis of wind power resources at 100-m height over the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 575-589.
    5. Gadad, Sanjeev & Deka, Paresh Chandra, 2016. "Offshore wind power resource assessment using Oceansat-2 scatterometer data at a regional scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 157-170.
    6. Florin Onea & Liliana Rusu, 2018. "Evaluation of Some State-Of-The-Art Wind Technologies in the Nearshore of the Black Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Lledó, Ll. & Torralba, V. & Soret, A. & Ramon, J. & Doblas-Reyes, F.J., 2019. "Seasonal forecasts of wind power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 91-100.
    8. Liu, Yichao & Chen, Daoyi & Li, Sunwei & Chan, P.W., 2018. "Discerning the spatial variations in offshore wind resources along the coast of China via dynamic downscaling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 582-596.
    9. Santiago Salvador & Xurxo Costoya & Francisco Javier Sanz-Larruga & Luis Gimeno, 2018. "Development of Offshore Wind Power: Contrasting Optimal Wind Sites with Legal Restrictions in Galicia, Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, March.
    10. Draxl, Caroline & Clifton, Andrew & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & McCaa, Jim, 2015. "The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 355-366.
    11. Olaofe, Z.O., 2018. "Review of energy systems deployment and development of offshore wind energy resource map at the coastal regions of Africa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1096-1114.
    12. Santos, F. & Gómez-Gesteira, M. & deCastro, M. & Añel, J.A. & Carvalho, D. & Costoya, Xurxo & Dias, J.M., 2018. "On the accuracy of CORDEX RCMs to project future winds over the Iberian Peninsula and surrounding ocean," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 289-300.
    13. Khan, Komal S. & Tariq, Muhammad, 2018. "Wind resource assessment using SODAR and meteorological mast – A case study of Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2443-2449.
    14. Carvalho, D. & Rocha, A. & Gómez-Gesteira, M. & Silva Santos, C., 2014. "Offshore wind energy resource simulation forced by different reanalyses: Comparison with observed data in the Iberian Peninsula," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 57-64.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Annas Fauzy & Cheng-Dar Yue & Chien-Cheng Tu & Ta-Hui Lin, 2021. "Understanding the Potential of Wind Farm Exploitation in Tropical Island Countries: A Case for Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costoya, X. & deCastro, M. & Carvalho, D. & Gómez-Gesteira, M., 2020. "On the suitability of offshore wind energy resource in the United States of America for the 21st century," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Chen, Xinping & Foley, Aoife & Zhang, Zenghai & Wang, Kaimin & O'Driscoll, Kieran, 2020. "An assessment of wind energy potential in the Beibu Gulf considering the energy demands of the Beibu Gulf Economic Rim," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Costoya, X. & Rocha, A. & Carvalho, D., 2020. "Using bias-correction to improve future projections of offshore wind energy resource: A case study on the Iberian Peninsula," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    4. Sward, J.A. & Ault, T.R. & Zhang, K.M., 2023. "Spatial biases revealed by LiDAR in a multiphysics WRF ensemble designed for offshore wind," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    5. Nie, Bingchuan & Li, Jiachun, 2018. "Technical potential assessment of offshore wind energy over shallow continent shelf along China coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 391-399.
    6. Jianzhou Wang & Chunying Wu & Tong Niu, 2019. "A Novel System for Wind Speed Forecasting Based on Multi-Objective Optimization and Echo State Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-34, January.
    7. Liu, Fa & Sun, Fubao & Liu, Wenbin & Wang, Tingting & Wang, Hong & Wang, Xunming & Lim, Wee Ho, 2019. "On wind speed pattern and energy potential in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 867-876.
    8. He, J.Y. & Li, Q.S. & Chan, P.W. & Zhao, X.D., 2023. "Assessment of future wind resources under climate change using a multi-model and multi-method ensemble approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    9. Cristian Mattar & Felipe Cabello-Españon & Nicolas G. Alonso-de-Linaje, 2021. "Towards a Future Scenario for Offshore Wind Energy in Chile: Breaking the Paradigm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    10. He, J.Y. & Chan, P.W. & Li, Q.S. & Lee, C.W., 2022. "Characterizing coastal wind energy resources based on sodar and microwave radiometer observations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    11. Santiago Salvador & Xurxo Costoya & Francisco Javier Sanz-Larruga & Luis Gimeno, 2018. "Development of Offshore Wind Power: Contrasting Optimal Wind Sites with Legal Restrictions in Galicia, Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Costoya, X. & deCastro, M. & Carvalho, D. & Arguilé-Pérez, B. & Gómez-Gesteira, M., 2022. "Combining offshore wind and solar photovoltaic energy to stabilize energy supply under climate change scenarios: A case study on the western Iberian Peninsula," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    13. Nguyen, Thi Anh Tuyet & Chou, Shuo-Yan, 2019. "Improved maintenance optimization of offshore wind systems considering effects of government subsidies, lost production and discounted cost model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich & Fischer, Wolfgang & Venghaus, Sandra & Weckenbrock, Christoph, 2015. "The German Energiewende – History and status quo," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 532-546.
    15. Yang, Jaemo & Sengupta, Manajit & Xie, Yu & Shin, Hyeyum Hailey, 2023. "Developing a 20-year high-resolution wind data set for Puerto Rico," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    16. Soares, Pedro M.M. & Lima, Daniela C.A. & Cardoso, Rita M. & Nascimento, Manuel L. & Semedo, Alvaro, 2017. "Western Iberian offshore wind resources: More or less in a global warming climate?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 72-90.
    17. Laura Castro-Santos & Maite deCastro & Xurxo Costoya & Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso & Isabel Lamas-Galdo & Americo Ribeiro & João M. Dias & Moncho Gómez-Gesteira, 2021. "Economic Feasibility of Floating Offshore Wind Farms Considering Near Future Wind Resources: Case Study of Iberian Coast and Bay of Biscay," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Nagababu, Garlapati & Kachhwaha, Surendra Singh & Naidu, Natansh K. & Savsani, Vimal, 2017. "Application of reanalysis data to estimate offshore wind potential in EEZ of India based on marine ecosystem considerations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 622-631.
    19. Gadad, Sanjeev & Deka, Paresh Chandra, 2016. "Offshore wind power resource assessment using Oceansat-2 scatterometer data at a regional scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 157-170.
    20. Costoya, X. & deCastro, M. & Carvalho, D. & Feng, Z. & Gómez-Gesteira, M., 2021. "Climate change impacts on the future offshore wind energy resource in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 731-747.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:189:y:2019:i:c:s0360544219319279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.