IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v172y2019icp1312-1328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-aspect evaluation of integrated forest-based biofuel production pathways: Part 2. economics, GHG emissions, technology maturity and production potentials

Author

Listed:
  • Jafri, Yawer
  • Wetterlund, Elisabeth
  • Anheden, Marie
  • Kulander, Ida
  • Håkansson, Åsa
  • Furusjö, Erik

Abstract

Promoting the deployment of forest-based drop-in and high blend biofuels is considered strategically important in Sweden but many aspects of the overall performance of the foremost production technologies are as yet unexamined. This paper evaluates the technology maturity, profitability, investment requirements, GHG performance and Swedish biofuel production potential of six commercially interesting forest-based biofuel production pathways.

Suggested Citation

  • Jafri, Yawer & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Anheden, Marie & Kulander, Ida & Håkansson, Åsa & Furusjö, Erik, 2019. "Multi-aspect evaluation of integrated forest-based biofuel production pathways: Part 2. economics, GHG emissions, technology maturity and production potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1312-1328.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:172:y:2019:i:c:p:1312-1328
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219302257
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holmgren, Kristina M. & Berntsson, Thore S. & Andersson, Eva & Rydberg, Tomas, 2016. "Comparison of integration options for gasification-based biofuel production systems – Economic and greenhouse gas emission implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 272-294.
    2. Jafri, Yawer & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Anheden, Marie & Kulander, Ida & Håkansson, Åsa & Furusjö, Erik, 2019. "Multi-aspect evaluation of integrated forest-based biofuel production pathways: Part 1. Product yields & energetic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 401-413.
    3. Pettersson, Karin & Harvey, Simon, 2012. "Comparison of black liquor gasification with other pulping biorefinery concepts – Systems analysis of economic performance and CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 136-153.
    4. Isaksson, Johan & Jansson, Mikael & Åsblad, Anders & Berntsson, Thore, 2016. "Transportation fuel production from gasified biomass integrated with a pulp and paper mill – Part A: Heat integration and system performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 557-571.
    5. Isaksson, Johan & Jansson, Mikael & Åsblad, Anders & Berntsson, Thore, 2016. "Transportation fuel production from gasified biomass integrated with a pulp and paper mill - Part B: Analysis of economic performance and greenhouse gas emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 522-532.
    6. Näyhä, Annukka & Pesonen, Hanna-Leena, 2014. "Strategic change in the forest industry towards the biorefining business," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 259-271.
    7. Axelsson, E. & Harvey, S. & Berntsson, T., 2009. "A tool for creating energy market scenarios for evaluation of investments in energy intensive industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2069-2074.
    8. Börjesson Hagberg, Martin & Pettersson, Karin & Ahlgren, Erik O., 2016. "Bioenergy futures in Sweden – Modeling integration scenarios for biofuel production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1026-1039.
    9. Nikolaidis, Pavlos & Poullikkas, Andreas, 2017. "A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 597-611.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karin Ericsson, 2021. "Potential for the Integrated Production of Biojet Fuel in Swedish Plant Infrastructures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Jafri, Yawer & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Mesfun, Sennai & Rådberg, Henrik & Mossberg, Johanna & Hulteberg, Christian & Furusjö, Erik, 2020. "Combining expansion in pulp capacity with production of sustainable biofuels – Techno-economic and greenhouse gas emissions assessment of drop-in fuels from black liquor part-streams," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    3. Zetterholm, Jonas & Mossberg, Johanna & Jafri, Yawer & Wetterlund, Elisabeth, 2022. "We need stable, long-term policy support! — Evaluating the economic rationale behind the prevalent investor lament for forest-based biofuel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonas Zetterholm & Elina Bryngemark & Johan Ahlström & Patrik Söderholm & Simon Harvey & Elisabeth Wetterlund, 2020. "Economic Evaluation of Large-Scale Biorefinery Deployment: A Framework Integrating Dynamic Biomass Market and Techno-Economic Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Rey, J.R.C. & Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C., 2021. "Biomass direct gasification for electricity generation and natural gas replacement in the lime kilns of the pulp and paper industry: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Holmgren, Kristina M. & Berntsson, Thore & Lönnqvist, Tomas, 2018. "Profitability and greenhouse gas emissions of gasification-based biofuel production - Analysis of sector specific policy instruments and comparison to conventional biomass conversion technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 997-1007.
    4. Yang, F. & Meerman, J.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2021. "Carbon capture and biomass in industry: A techno-economic analysis and comparison of negative emission options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Bressanin, Jéssica Marcon & Guimarães, Henrique Real & Chagas, Mateus Ferreira & Sampaio, Isabelle Lobo de Mesquita & Klein, Bruno Colling & Watanabe, Marcos Djun Barbosa & Bonomi, Antonio & Morais, E, 2021. "Advanced technologies for electricity production in the sugarcane value chain are a strategic option in a carbon reward policy context," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Marian R. Chertow & Koichi S. Kanaoka & Jooyoung Park, 2021. "Tracking the diffusion of industrial symbiosis scholarship using bibliometrics: Comparing across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 913-931, August.
    7. Zetterholm, Jonas & Pettersson, Karin & Leduc, Sylvain & Mesfun, Sennai & Lundgren, Joakim & Wetterlund, Elisabeth, 2018. "Resource efficiency or economy of scale: Biorefinery supply chain configurations for co-gasification of black liquor and pyrolysis liquids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 912-924.
    8. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C., 2021. "Industrial gasification systems (>3 MWth) for bioenergy in Europe: Current status and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    9. Pettersson, Karin & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Athanassiadis, Dimitris & Lundmark, Robert & Ehn, Christian & Lundgren, Joakim & Berglin, Niklas, 2015. "Integration of next-generation biofuel production in the Swedish forest industry – A geographically explicit approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 317-332.
    10. Jafri, Yawer & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Anheden, Marie & Kulander, Ida & Håkansson, Åsa & Furusjö, Erik, 2019. "Multi-aspect evaluation of integrated forest-based biofuel production pathways: Part 1. Product yields & energetic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 401-413.
    11. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    12. Zetterholm, Jonas & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Pettersson, Karin & Lundgren, Joakim, 2018. "Evaluation of value chain configurations for fast pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass - Integration, feedstock, and product choice," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 564-575.
    13. Pio, D.T. & Gomes, H.G.M.F. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Vilas-Boas, A.C.M. & Matos, M.A.A. & Lemos, F.M.S., 2022. "Superheated steam injection as primary measure to improve producer gas quality from biomass air gasification in an autothermal pilot-scale gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1223-1236.
    14. Ahlström, Johan M. & Pettersson, Karin & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Harvey, Simon, 2017. "Value chains for integrated production of liquefied bio-SNG at sawmill sites – Techno-economic and carbon footprint evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1590-1608.
    15. Holmgren, Kristina M. & Andersson, Eva & Berntsson, Thore & Rydberg, Tomas, 2014. "Gasification-based methanol production from biomass in industrial clusters: Characterisation of energy balances and greenhouse gas emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 622-637.
    16. Karin Ericsson, 2021. "Potential for the Integrated Production of Biojet Fuel in Swedish Plant Infrastructures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Bortoni, Edson C. & Magalhães, Leonardo P. & Nogueira, Luiz A.H. & Bajay, Sérgio V. & Cassula, Agnelo M., 2020. "An assessment of energy efficient motors application by scenarios evaluation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    18. Sadeghi, Shayan & Ghandehariun, Samane, 2022. "A standalone solar thermochemical water splitting hydrogen plant with high-temperature molten salt: Thermodynamic and economic analyses and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    19. Hellsmark, Hans & Hansen, Teis, 2020. "A new dawn for (oil) incumbents within the bioeconomy? Trade-offs and lessons for policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    20. Gal Hochman & Chrysostomos Tabakis, 2020. "Biofuels and Their Potential in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:172:y:2019:i:c:p:1312-1328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.