IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v161y2018icp1250-1261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison between ORC and CO2 power systems for the exploitation of low-medium temperature heat sources

Author

Listed:
  • Astolfi, Marco
  • Alfani, Dario
  • Lasala, Silvia
  • Macchi, Ennio

Abstract

Low-medium temperature heat sources in the range 5–50 MWth are made available by many industrial fields but they may also be of interest for biomass, geothermal and solar energy applications. ORC has been proposed in the last 20 years as a reliable solution for the exploitation of these energy sources since the alternative represented by steam cycles leads to an inefficient conversion of such small available thermal powers. However, the use of organic fluids involves a number of safety and environmental issues, either related to fluid flammability (for hydrocarbons) or to their high Global Warming Potential (for halogenated fluids), and of limitations to the achievable cycle maximum temperature, due to fluids thermal decomposition. To overcome these limitations, in recent years CO2-based transcritical and supercritical cycles have been proposed as a viable option for this kind of applications. The present work aims to present a comparison between four CO2 cycle configurations and four ORC layouts using a working fluid selected from 47 candidates. The final result is a set of performance maps that allow for an easy selection of the best solution for applications exploiting low-medium temperature heat sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Astolfi, Marco & Alfani, Dario & Lasala, Silvia & Macchi, Ennio, 2018. "Comparison between ORC and CO2 power systems for the exploitation of low-medium temperature heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1250-1261.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:161:y:2018:i:c:p:1250-1261
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218313963
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part B: Techno-economic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 435-446.
    2. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    3. González-Roubaud, Edouard & Pérez-Osorio, David & Prieto, Cristina, 2017. "Review of commercial thermal energy storage in concentrated solar power plants: Steam vs. molten salts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 133-148.
    4. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (organic Rankine cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part A: Thermodynamic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 423-434.
    5. Mecheri, Mounir & Le Moullec, Yann, 2016. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for coal-fired power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 758-771.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Bo & Wang, Shun-sen, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a hybrid cascade supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Liu, Zhan & Liu, Zihui & Cao, Xing & Li, Hailong & Yang, Xiaohu, 2020. "Self-condensing transcritical CO2 cogeneration system with extraction turbine and ejector refrigeration cycle: A techno-economic assessment study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    3. Nikolay Rogalev & Andrey Rogalev & Vladimir Kindra & Olga Zlyvko & Pavel Bryzgunov, 2022. "Review of Closed SCO 2 and Semi-Closed Oxy–Fuel Combustion Power Cycles for Multi-Scale Power Generation in Terms of Energy, Ecology and Economic Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-37, December.
    4. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Maria Alessandra Ancona & Michele Bianchi & Lisa Branchini & Andrea De Pascale & Francesco Melino & Antonio Peretto & Noemi Torricelli, 2021. "Systematic Comparison of ORC and s-CO 2 Combined Heat and Power Plants for Energy Harvesting in Industrial Gas Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Abubakr Ayub & Costante M. Invernizzi & Gioele Di Marcoberardino & Paolo Iora & Giampaolo Manzolini, 2020. "Carbon Dioxide Mixtures as Working Fluid for High-Temperature Heat Recovery: A Thermodynamic Comparison with Transcritical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Giovanni Manente & Mário Costa, 2020. "On the Conceptual Design of Novel Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, January.
    8. Lee, Inkyu & Tester, Jefferson William & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Systems analysis, design, and optimization of geothermal energy systems for power production and polygeneration: State-of-the-art and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 551-577.
    9. Liya Ren & Huaixin Wang, 2020. "Optimization and Comparison of Two Combined Cycles Consisting of CO 2 and Organic Trans-Critical Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Cui, Guodong & Pei, Shufeng & Rui, Zhenhua & Dou, Bin & Ning, Fulong & Wang, Jiaqiang, 2021. "Whole process analysis of geothermal exploitation and power generation from a depleted high-temperature gas reservoir by recycling CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    11. Hui-Xing, Zhai & Wei, Dong & Lin, Shi & Qing-Song, An & Sui-Lin, Wang & Bao-Lin, An, 2022. "Theoretical selection criteria of organic Rankine cycle form for different heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jing & Gao, Guangtao & Kutlu, Cagri & Liu, Keliang & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Ji, Jie & Riffat, Saffa, 2019. "A novel approach to thermal storage of direct steam generation solar power systems through two-step heat discharge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 81-100.
    2. Zhang, Jianan & Qin, Kan & Li, Daijin & Luo, Kai & Dang, Jianjun, 2020. "Potential of Organic Rankine Cycles for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Alvin Kiprono Bett & Saeid Jalilinasrabady, 2021. "Optimization of ORC Power Plants for Geothermal Application in Kenya by Combining Exergy and Pinch Point Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Tomislav Malvić & Uroš Barudžija & Borivoje Pašić & Josip Ivšinović, 2021. "Small Unconventional Hydrocarbon Gas Reservoirs as Challenging Energy Sources, Case Study from Northern Croatia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    6. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Oko, Eni, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of supercritical CO2 closed Brayton cycles for coal-fired power generation with solvent-based CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1074-1088.
    7. Van Erdeweghe, Sarah & Van Bael, Johan & Laenen, Ben & D’haeseleer, William, 2019. "Design and off-design optimization procedure for low-temperature geothermal organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 716-731.
    8. Wang, Shengpeng & Zhang, Yifan & Li, Hongzhi & Yao, Mingyu & Peng, Botao & Yan, Junjie, 2020. "Thermohydrodynamic analysis of the vertical gas wall and reheat gas wall in a 300 MW supercritical CO2 boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    9. Gao, Lei & Cao, Tao & Hwang, Yunho & Radermacher, Reinhard, 2022. "Robustness analysis in supercritical CO2 power generation system configuration optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    10. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    11. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    12. Francesca Ceglia & Adriano Macaluso & Elisa Marrasso & Carlo Roselli & Laura Vanoli, 2020. "Energy, Environmental, and Economic Analyses of Geothermal Polygeneration System Using Dynamic Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-34, September.
    13. Yu, Haoshui & Eason, John & Biegler, Lorenz T. & Feng, Xiao, 2017. "Simultaneous heat integration and techno-economic optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for multiple waste heat stream recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 322-333.
    14. Liu, Qiang & Shang, Linlin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2016. "Performance analyses of a hybrid geothermal–fossil power generation system using low-enthalpy geothermal resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 149-162.
    15. Li, Jing & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Li, Pengcheng & Gao, Guangtao & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle efficiency with respect to the equivalent hot side temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 668-683.
    16. Angelo La Seta & Andrea Meroni & Jesper Graa Andreasen & Leonardo Pierobon & Giacomo Persico & Fredrik Haglind, 2016. "Combined Turbine and Cycle Optimization for Organic Rankine Cycle Power Systems—Part B: Application on a Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Calise, Francesco & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Macaluso, Adriano & Vanoli, Laura & Piacentino, Antonio, 2016. "A novel solar-geothermal trigeneration system integrating water desalination: Design, dynamic simulation and economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1533-1547.
    18. Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Yifan & Yao, Mingyu & Yang, Yu & Han, Wanlong & Bai, Wengang, 2019. "Design assessment of a 5 MW fossil-fired supercritical CO2 power cycle pilot loop," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 792-804.
    19. Guido Francesco Frate & Lorenzo Ferrari & Umberto Desideri, 2020. "Rankine Carnot Batteries with the Integration of Thermal Energy Sources: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-28, September.
    20. van Kleef, Luuk M.T. & Oyewunmi, Oyeniyi A. & Markides, Christos N., 2019. "Multi-objective thermo-economic optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power systems in waste-heat recovery applications using computer-aided molecular design techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:161:y:2018:i:c:p:1250-1261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.