IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v242y2019icp716-731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and off-design optimization procedure for low-temperature geothermal organic Rankine cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Van Erdeweghe, Sarah
  • Van Bael, Johan
  • Laenen, Ben
  • D’haeseleer, William

Abstract

In this paper, a two-step optimization methodology for the design and off-design optimization of low-temperature (110–150 °C) geothermal organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) is proposed. For the investigated conditions—which are based on the Belgian situation—we have found that the optimal ORC design is obtained for design parameter values for the environment temperature and for the electricity price which are both higher than the respective yearly-averaged values. However, the net present value is negative (−12.62 MEUR) which indicates that the low-temperature (130 °C) geothermal electric power plant is not economically attractive for the investigated case. Nevertheless, and demonstrated by the results of a detailed sensitivity analysis, a low-temperature geothermal power plant might be economically feasible for geological sites with a higher brine temperature or in a country with a more favorable economic situation; e.g., with higher electricity prices (∼70 EUR/MWh). The novelty of our paper is the development of a thermoeconomic design optimization strategy for low-temperature geothermal ORCs, accounting for the off-design behavior already in the design stage. The generic methodology is valid for low-temperature geothermal ORCs (with MW scale power output) and includes detailed thermodynamic and geometric component models, is based on hourly data rather than monthly-averaged data and accounts for economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Erdeweghe, Sarah & Van Bael, Johan & Laenen, Ben & D’haeseleer, William, 2019. "Design and off-design optimization procedure for low-temperature geothermal organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 716-731.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:242:y:2019:i:c:p:716-731
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919305513
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.142?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Usman, Muhammad & Imran, Muhammad & Yang, Youngmin & Lee, Dong Hyun & Park, Byung-Sik, 2017. "Thermo-economic comparison of air-cooled and cooling tower based Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) with R245fa and R1233zde as candidate working fluids for different geographical climate conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 353-366.
    2. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part B: Techno-economic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 435-446.
    3. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Schampheleire, S. & De Paepe, M., 2013. "Part load based thermo-economic optimization of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) applied to a combined heat and power (CHP) system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 871-881.
    4. Manente, Giovanni & Da Lio, Luca & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2016. "Influence of axial turbine efficiency maps on the performance of subcritical and supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 761-772.
    5. Van Erdeweghe, Sarah & Van Bael, Johan & Laenen, Ben & D'haeseleer, William, 2017. "Comparison of series/parallel configuration for a low-T geothermal CHP plant, coupled to thermal networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 494-505.
    6. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (organic Rankine cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part A: Thermodynamic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 423-434.
    7. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    8. Manente, Giovanni & Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Paci, Marco, 2013. "An Organic Rankine Cycle off-design model for the search of the optimal control strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 97-106.
    9. Imran, Muhammad & Usman, Muhammad & Park, Byung-Sik & Yang, Youngmin, 2016. "Comparative assessment of Organic Rankine Cycle integration for low temperature geothermal heat source applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 473-490.
    10. Walraven, Daniël & Laenen, Ben & D'haeseleer, William, 2015. "Economic system optimization of air-cooled organic Rankine cycles powered by low-temperature geothermal heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 104-113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Xia & Zhang, Hanwei & Fang, Song & Rong, Yangyiming & Xu, Zhuoren & Jiang, Hanying & Wang, Kai & Zhi, Xiaoqin & Qiu, Limin, 2022. "Off-design performance analysis with various operation methods for ORC-based compression heat recovery system in cryogenic air separation units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    2. Wang, Mingtao & Zhang, Juan & Liu, Qiyi & Tan, Luzhi, 2020. "Effects of critical temperature, critical pressure and dryness of working fluids on the performance of the transcritical organic rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Li, Jian & Peng, Xiayao & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    4. Tomasz Sliwa & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa & Andrzej Gonet & Tomasz Kowalski & Anna Sojczyńska, 2021. "Geothermal Boreholes in Poland—Overview of the Current State of Knowledge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Oh, Jinwoo & Park, Yunjae & Lee, Hoseong, 2022. "Development of a fully deterministic simulation model for organic Rankine cycle operating under off-design conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    6. Soltani, M. & Moradi Kashkooli, Farshad & Souri, Mohammad & Rafiei, Behnam & Jabarifar, Mohammad & Gharali, Kobra & Nathwani, Jatin S., 2021. "Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. Li, Xiaoya & Xu, Bin & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Towards a novel holistic design of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems operating under heat source fluctuations and intermittency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    8. Zinsalo, Joël M. & Lamarche, Louis & Raymond, Jasmin, 2022. "Performance analysis and working fluid selection of an Organic Rankine Cycle Power Plant coupled to an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    9. Petrollese, Mario & Cocco, Daniele, 2020. "A multi-scenario approach for a robust design of solar-based ORC systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1184-1194.
    10. Schifflechner, Christopher & Kuhnert, Lara & Irrgang, Ludwig & Dawo, Fabian & Kaufmann, Florian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2023. "Geothermal trigeneration systems with Organic Rankine Cycles: Evaluation of different plant configurations considering part load behaviour," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 218-233.
    11. Liang, Zheng & Liang, Yingzong & Luo, Xianglong & Chen, Jianyong & Yang, Zhi & Wang, Chao & Chen, Ying, 2022. "Superstructure-based mixed-integer nonlinear programming framework for hybrid heat sources driven organic Rankine cycle optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    12. Shuozhuo Hu & Zhen Yang & Jian Li & Yuanyuan Duan, 2021. "A Review of Multi-Objective Optimization in Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-36, October.
    13. Chen, Hao & Zhao, Li & Cong, Haifeng & Li, Xingang, 2022. "Synthesis of waste heat recovery using solar organic Rankine cycle in the separation of benzene/toluene/p-xylene process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    14. Liu, Zekuan & Wang, Zixuan & Cheng, Kunlin & Wang, Cong & Ha, Chan & Fei, Teng & Qin, Jiang, 2023. "Performance assessment of closed Brayton cycle-organic Rankine cycle lunar base energy system: Thermodynamic analysis, multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    15. Li, Jian & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Yang, Fubin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Thermo-economic analyses and evaluations of small-scale dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle system using pure fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    16. Fumin Pan & Xiaobei Cheng & Xin Wu & Xin Wang & Jingfeng Gong, 2019. "Thermodynamic Design and Performance Calculation of the Thermochemical Reformers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Van Erdeweghe, Sarah & Van Bael, Johan & Laenen, Ben & D'haeseleer, William, 2019. "Optimal configuration for a low-temperature geothermal CHP plant based on thermoeconomic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 323-335.
    18. Xia, Xiaoxia & Liu, Zhipeng & Wang, Zhiqi & Sun, Tong & Zhang, Hualong & Zhang, Sifeng, 2023. "Thermo-economic-environmental optimization design of dual-loop organic Rankine cycle under fluctuating heat source temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martelli, Emanuele & Capra, Federico & Consonni, Stefano, 2015. "Numerical optimization of Combined Heat and Power Organic Rankine Cycles – Part A: Design optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 310-328.
    2. Sanne Lemmens, 2016. "Cost Engineering Techniques and Their Applicability for Cost Estimation of Organic Rankine Cycle Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Zhang, Cheng & Liu, Chao & Wang, Shukun & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Li, Qibin, 2017. "Thermo-economic comparison of subcritical organic Rankine cycle based on different heat exchanger configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 728-741.
    4. Zhang, Jianan & Qin, Kan & Li, Daijin & Luo, Kai & Dang, Jianjun, 2020. "Potential of Organic Rankine Cycles for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    6. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    7. Yu, Haoshui & Eason, John & Biegler, Lorenz T. & Feng, Xiao, 2017. "Simultaneous heat integration and techno-economic optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for multiple waste heat stream recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 322-333.
    8. Li, Jing & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Li, Pengcheng & Gao, Guangtao & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle efficiency with respect to the equivalent hot side temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 668-683.
    9. Serafino, Aldo & Obert, Benoit & Vergé, Léa & Cinnella, Paola, 2020. "Robust optimization of an organic Rankine cycle for geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1120-1129.
    10. Astolfi, M. & La Diega, L. Noto & Romano, M.C. & Merlo, U. & Filippini, S. & Macchi, E., 2020. "Techno-economic optimization of a geothermal ORC with novel “Emeritus” heat rejection units in hot climates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2810-2821.
    11. Wu, Dan & Aye, Lu & Ngo, Tuan & Mendis, Priyan, 2017. "Optimisation and financial analysis of an organic Rankine cycle cooling system driven by facade integrated solar collectors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 172-182.
    12. Francesco Calise & Davide Capuano & Laura Vanoli, 2015. "Dynamic Simulation and Exergo-Economic Optimization of a Hybrid Solar–Geothermal Cogeneration Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-41, April.
    13. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2018. "Exergetic optimization of double stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 296-313.
    14. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    15. Karimi, Shahram & Mansouri, Sima, 2018. "A comparative profitability study of geothermal electricity production in developed and developing countries: Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of different ORC configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 600-619.
    16. Le, Van Long & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Feidt, Michel & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic optimizations of a waste heat to power plant driven by a subcritical ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) using pure or zeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 622-638.
    17. Peris, Bernardo & Navarro-Esbrí, Joaquín & Mateu-Royo, Carlos & Mota-Babiloni, Adrián & Molés, Francisco & Gutiérrez-Trashorras, Antonio J. & Amat-Albuixech, Marta, 2020. "Thermo-economic optimization of small-scale Organic Rankine Cycle: A case study for low-grade industrial waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    18. Liya Ren & Huaixin Wang, 2019. "Parametric Optimization and Thermodynamic Performance Comparison of Organic Trans-Critical Cycle, Steam Flash Cycle, and Steam Dual-Pressure Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    19. Fabien Marty & Sylvain Serra & Sabine Sochard & Jean-Michel Reneaume, 2019. "Exergy Analysis and Optimization of a Combined Heat and Power Geothermal Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Liya Ren & Jianyu Liu & Huaixin Wang, 2020. "Thermodynamic Optimization of a Waste Heat Power System under Economic Constraint," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:242:y:2019:i:c:p:716-731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.