IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i18p4603-d409112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy, Environmental, and Economic Analyses of Geothermal Polygeneration System Using Dynamic Simulations

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Ceglia

    (Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

  • Adriano Macaluso

    (Department of Engineering, University of Naples Parthenope, 80143 Naples, Italy)

  • Elisa Marrasso

    (Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

  • Carlo Roselli

    (Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

  • Laura Vanoli

    (Department of Engineering, University of Naples Parthenope, 80143 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

This paper presents a thermodynamic, economic, and environmental analysis of a renewable polygeneration system connected to a district heating and cooling network. The system, fed by geothermal energy, provides thermal energy for heating and cooling, and domestic hot water for a residential district located in the metropolitan city of Naples (South of Italy). The produced electricity is partly used for auxiliaries of the thermal district and partly sold to the power grid. A calibration control strategy was implemented by considering manufacturer data matching the appropriate operating temperature levels in each component. The cooling and thermal demands of the connected users were calculated using suitable building dynamic simulation models. An energy network dedicated to heating and cooling loads was designed and simulated by considering the variable ground temperature throughout the year, as well as the accurate heat transfer coefficients and pressure losses of the network pipes. The results were based on a 1-year dynamic simulation and were analyzed on a daily, monthly, and yearly basis. The performance was evaluated by means of the main economic and environmental aspects. Two parametric analyses were performed by varying geothermal well depth, to consider the uncertainty in the geofluid temperature as a function of the depth, and by varying the time of operation of the district heating and cooling network. Additionally, the economic analysis was performed by considering two different scenarios with and without feed-in tariffs. Based on the assumptions made, the system is economically feasible only if feed-in tariffs are considered: the minimum Simple Pay Back period is 7.00 years, corresponding to a Discounted Pay Back period of 8.84 years, and the maximum Net Present Value is 6.11 M€, corresponding to a Profit Index of 77.9% and a maximum Internal Rate of Return of 13.0%. The system allows avoiding exploitation of 27.2 GWh of primary energy yearly, corresponding to 5.49∙10 3 tons of CO 2 avoided emissions. The increase of the time of the operation increases the economic profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Ceglia & Adriano Macaluso & Elisa Marrasso & Carlo Roselli & Laura Vanoli, 2020. "Energy, Environmental, and Economic Analyses of Geothermal Polygeneration System Using Dynamic Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-34, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4603-:d:409112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4603/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4603/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vera, David & Jurado, Francisco & Carpio, José & Kamel, Salah, 2018. "Biomass gasification coupled to an EFGT-ORC combined system to maximize the electrical energy generation: A case applied to the olive oil industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 41-53.
    2. Calise, Francesco & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Figaj, Rafal Damian & Vanoli, Laura, 2016. "A novel solar-assisted heat pump driven by photovoltaic/thermal collectors: Dynamic simulation and thermoeconomic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 346-366.
    3. Hajabdollahi, Zahra & Hajabdollahi, Farzaneh & Tehrani, Mahdi & Hajabdollahi, Hassan, 2013. "Thermo-economic environmental optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle for diesel waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 142-151.
    4. Carotenuto, Alberto & Figaj, Rafal Damian & Vanoli, Laura, 2017. "A novel solar-geothermal district heating, cooling and domestic hot water system: Dynamic simulation and energy-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2652-2669.
    5. Calise, Francesco & Macaluso, Adriano & Piacentino, Antonio & Vanoli, Laura, 2017. "A novel hybrid polygeneration system supplying energy and desalinated water by renewable sources in Pantelleria Island," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1086-1106.
    6. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (organic Rankine cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part A: Thermodynamic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 423-434.
    7. Calise, F. & Di Fraia, S. & Macaluso, A. & Massarotti, N. & Vanoli, L., 2018. "A geothermal energy system for wastewater sludge drying and electricity production in a small island," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 130-143.
    8. Calise, F. & Palombo, A. & Vanoli, L., 2010. "Maximization of primary energy savings of solar heating and cooling systems by transient simulations and computer design of experiments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 524-540, February.
    9. Manfred Lenzen, 2010. "Current State of Development of Electricity-Generating Technologies: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-130, March.
    10. Boyaghchi, Fateme Ahmadi & Chavoshi, Mansoure & Sabeti, Vajiheh, 2018. "Multi-generation system incorporated with PEM electrolyzer and dual ORC based on biomass gasification waste heat recovery: Exergetic, economic and environmental impact optimizations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 38-51.
    11. Jana, Kuntal & Ray, Avishek & Majoumerd, Mohammad Mansouri & Assadi, Mohsen & De, Sudipta, 2017. "Polygeneration as a future sustainable energy solution – A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 88-111.
    12. Trumpy, E. & Botteghi, S. & Caiozzi, F. & Donato, A. & Gola, G. & Montanari, D. & Pluymaekers, M.P.D. & Santilano, A. & van Wees, J.D. & Manzella, A., 2016. "Geothermal potential assessment for a low carbon strategy: A new systematic approach applied in southern Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 167-181.
    13. Hendricks, Aaron M. & Wagner, John E. & Volk, Timothy A. & Newman, David H. & Brown, Tristan R., 2016. "A cost-effective evaluation of biomass district heating in rural communities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 561-569.
    14. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part B: Techno-economic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 435-446.
    15. Györke, Gábor & Deiters, Ulrich K. & Groniewsky, Axel & Lassu, Imre & Imre, Attila R., 2018. "Novel classification of pure working fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 288-300.
    16. Serra, Luis M. & Lozano, Miguel-Angel & Ramos, Jose & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Nebra, Silvia A., 2009. "Polygeneration and efficient use of natural resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 575-586.
    17. Cook, David & Fazeli, Reza & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur, 2019. "The need for integrated valuation tools to support decision-making – The case of cultural ecosystem services sourced from geothermal areas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    19. Invernizzi, Costante & Bombarda, Paola, 1997. "Thermodynamic performance of selected HCFS for geothermal applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 22(9), pages 887-895.
    20. Wang, J.L. & Zhao, L. & Wang, X.D., 2010. "A comparative study of pure and zeotropic mixtures in low-temperature solar Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3366-3373, November.
    21. Mendes, Gonçalo & Ioakimidis, Christos & Ferrão, Paulo, 2011. "On the planning and analysis of Integrated Community Energy Systems: A review and survey of available tools," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4836-4854.
    22. Calise, Francesco & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Macaluso, Adriano & Vanoli, Laura & Piacentino, Antonio, 2016. "A novel solar-geothermal trigeneration system integrating water desalination: Design, dynamic simulation and economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1533-1547.
    23. Lund, Henrik & Duic, Neven & Østergaard, Poul Alberg & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2018. "Future district heating systems and technologies: On the role of smart energy systems and 4th generation district heating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 614-619.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jian Kuang & Shihua Qi & Xiangyun Hu, 2021. "New Insights into Crust and upper Mantle Structure in Guangdong Province, China and Its Geothermal Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Hamels, Sam & Himpe, Eline & Laverge, Jelle & Delghust, Marc & Van den Brande, Kjartan & Janssens, Arnold & Albrecht, Johan, 2021. "The use of primary energy factors and CO2 intensities for electricity in the European context - A systematic methodological review and critical evaluation of the contemporary literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Seppo Sierla & Heikki Ihasalo & Valeriy Vyatkin, 2022. "A Review of Reinforcement Learning Applications to Control of Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    4. Cruz-Pérez, Noelia & Santamarta, Juan C. & Rodríguez-Martín, Jesica & Beltrán, Rubén Fuentes & García-Gil, Alejandro, 2023. "Photovoltaic potential of public buildings in a world Heritage city: The case of San Cristóbal de La Laguna (Canary Islands, Spain)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 357-364.
    5. Wenshuai Bai & Dian Wang & Zhongquan Miao & Xiaorong Sun & Jiabin Yu & Jiping Xu & Yuqing Pan, 2023. "The Design and Application of Microgrid Supervisory System for Commercial Buildings Considering Dynamic Converter Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Huiping Wang & Yi Wang, 2022. "Estimating per Capita Primary Energy Consumption Using a Novel Fractional Gray Bernoulli Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Chen Chen, 2023. "Evaluation Methods and Optimization Strategies for Low-Carbon-Oriented Urban Road Network Structures: A Case Study of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Francesca Ceglia & Elisa Marrasso & Carlo Roselli & Maurizio Sasso & Guido Coletta & Luigi Pellegrino, 2022. "Biomass-Based Renewable Energy Community: Economic Analysis of a Real Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesca Ceglia & Adriano Macaluso & Elisa Marrasso & Maurizio Sasso & Laura Vanoli, 2020. "Modelling of Polymeric Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers for Low-Medium Temperature Geothermal Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Calise, Francesco & de Notaristefani di Vastogirardi, Giulio & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2018. "Simulation of polygeneration systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 290-337.
    3. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    4. Li, Jing & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Li, Pengcheng & Gao, Guangtao & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle efficiency with respect to the equivalent hot side temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 668-683.
    5. Calise, Francesco & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Macaluso, Adriano & Vanoli, Laura & Piacentino, Antonio, 2016. "A novel solar-geothermal trigeneration system integrating water desalination: Design, dynamic simulation and economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1533-1547.
    6. Gómez Aláez, S.L. & Bombarda, P. & Invernizzi, C.M. & Iora, P. & Silva, P., 2015. "Evaluation of ORC modules performance adopting commercial plastic heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 882-890.
    7. Chang, C.T. & Costa, M. & La Villetta, M. & Macaluso, A. & Piazzullo, D. & Vanoli, L., 2019. "Thermo-economic analyses of a Taiwanese combined CHP system fuelled with syngas from rice husk gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 766-780.
    8. Karimi, Shahram & Mansouri, Sima, 2018. "A comparative profitability study of geothermal electricity production in developed and developing countries: Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of different ORC configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 600-619.
    9. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    11. Carotenuto, Alberto & Figaj, Rafal Damian & Vanoli, Laura, 2017. "A novel solar-geothermal district heating, cooling and domestic hot water system: Dynamic simulation and energy-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2652-2669.
    12. Luis Gabriel Gesteira & Javier Uche, 2022. "A Novel Polygeneration System Based on a Solar-Assisted Desiccant Cooling System for Residential Buildings: An Energy and Environmental Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Mohammadi, Kasra & Khanmohammadi, Saber & Khorasanizadeh, Hossein & Powell, Kody, 2020. "A comprehensive review of solar only and hybrid solar driven multigeneration systems: Classifications, benefits, design and prospective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    14. Florian Heberle & Dieter Brüggemann, 2015. "Thermo-Economic Evaluation of Organic Rankine Cycles for Geothermal Power Generation Using Zeotropic Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-28, March.
    15. Loni, Reyhaneh & Mahian, Omid & Markides, Christos N. & Bellos, Evangelos & le Roux, Willem G. & Kasaeian, Ailbakhsh & Najafi, Gholamhassan & Rajaee, Fatemeh, 2021. "A review of solar-driven organic Rankine cycles: Recent challenges and future outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    16. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    17. van Kleef, Luuk M.T. & Oyewunmi, Oyeniyi A. & Markides, Christos N., 2019. "Multi-objective thermo-economic optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power systems in waste-heat recovery applications using computer-aided molecular design techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Francesco Calise & Davide Capuano & Laura Vanoli, 2015. "Dynamic Simulation and Exergo-Economic Optimization of a Hybrid Solar–Geothermal Cogeneration Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-41, April.
    19. Palmer-Wilson, K. & Banks, J. & Walsh, W. & Robertson, B., 2018. "Sedimentary basin geothermal favourability mapping and power generation assessments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 1087-1100.
    20. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2018. "Exergetic optimization of double stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 296-313.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4603-:d:409112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.