IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v152y2018icp313-321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Control optimization to achieve energy-efficient operation of the air separation unit in oxy-fuel combustion power plants

Author

Listed:
  • Jin, Bo
  • Zhao, Haibo
  • Zheng, Chuguang
  • Liang, Zhiwu

Abstract

Cryogenic air separation unit (ASU) is considered as the currently available commercial oxygen production method for oxy-fuel combustion power plants; however, this method leads to significant energy penalty and economic cost. Real-time optimizing system operations during dynamic processes (such as flow rate change, oxygen product purity change, and flexible operation) are expected to achieve remarkable energy savings. Dynamic exergy provides a powerful indicator for real-time evaluating the system thermodynamic performance and quantifying the impact of a control strategy. In this work, some important transient exergy parameters of ASU systems under typical dynamic operating scenarios were first obtained through combining steady-state and dynamic process simulations. Next, control penalty and cost for internal control structures (layers and loops) were determined for the optimizations of control strategy and operation. Feedforward-feedback control structure and ASU-following control strategy are more suitable for ASU regulation and flexible operation, respectively, because more efficient thermodynamic performance is achieved during the investigated operating scenarios. The control structure, layer and loop play different roles in terms of energy behavior and require reasonable regulation to optimize energy behavior. This study provides an important insight into using control optimization aided by the dynamic exergy method to implement energy-efficient operations for industrial plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin, Bo & Zhao, Haibo & Zheng, Chuguang & Liang, Zhiwu, 2018. "Control optimization to achieve energy-efficient operation of the air separation unit in oxy-fuel combustion power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 313-321.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:152:y:2018:i:c:p:313-321
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218305632
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hu, Yukun & Li, Xun & Li, Hailong & Yan, Jinyue, 2013. "Peak and off-peak operations of the air separation unit in oxy-coal combustion power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 747-754.
    2. Fu, Chao & Anantharaman, Rahul & Gundersen, Truls, 2015. "Optimal integration of compression heat with regenerative steam Rankine cycles in oxy-combustion coal based power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 612-622.
    3. Fu, Chao & Gundersen, Truls, 2013. "Recuperative vapor recompression heat pumps in cryogenic air separation processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 708-718.
    4. Jin, Bo & Zhao, Haibo & Zheng, Chuguang, 2015. "Optimization and control for CO2 compression and purification unit in oxy-combustion power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 416-430.
    5. Fu, Chao & Gundersen, Truls, 2012. "Using exergy analysis to reduce power consumption in air separation units for oxy-combustion processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 60-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Zhijiang & Tian, Zhaofei & Ma, Xiaoyu, 2024. "Dynamic exergy analysis of feed water heater in nuclear power plant during start-up process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Jin, Bo & Yao, Wenxing & Liu, Kaile & Lu, Shijian & Luo, Xiao & Liang, Zhiwu, 2022. "Self-optimizing control and safety assessment to achieve economic and safe operation for oxy-fuel combustion boiler island systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    3. Zhou, Xia & Zhang, Hanwei & Rong, Yangyiming & Song, Jian & Fang, Song & Xu, Zhuoren & Zhi, Xiaoqin & Wang, Kai & Qiu, Limin & Markides, Christos N., 2022. "Comparative study for air compression heat recovery based on organic Rankine cycle (ORC) in cryogenic air separation units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    4. Charalampos Michalakakis & Jonathan M. Cullen, 2022. "Dynamic exergy analysis: From industrial data to exergy flows," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 12-26, February.
    5. Cui, Chengtian & Qi, Meng & Zhang, Xiaodong & Sun, Jinsheng & Li, Qing & Kiss, Anton A. & Wong, David Shan-Hill & Masuku, Cornelius M. & Lee, Moonyong, 2024. "Electrification of distillation for decarbonization: An overview and perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    6. Moon, Ji-Hong & Jo, Sung-Ho & Park, Sung Jin & Khoi, Nguyen Hoang & Seo, Myung Won & Ra, Ho Won & Yoon, Sang-Jun & Yoon, Sung-Min & Lee, Jae-Goo & Mun, Tae-Young, 2019. "Carbon dioxide purity and combustion characteristics of oxy firing compared to air firing in a pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 183-192.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ebrahimi, Armin & Meratizaman, Mousa & Akbarpour Reyhani, Hamed & Pourali, Omid & Amidpour, Majid, 2015. "Energetic, exergetic and economic assessment of oxygen production from two columns cryogenic air separation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1298-1316.
    2. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Zhang, Yongliang & Jin, Bo & Zou, Xixian & Zhao, Haibo, 2016. "A clean coal utilization technology based on coal pyrolysis and chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling: Principle and experimental validation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 181-189.
    4. Fu, Chao & Gundersen, Truls, 2016. "Correct integration of compressors and expanders in above ambient heat exchanger networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P2), pages 1282-1293.
    5. Chen, Shiqing & Dong, Xuezhi & Xu, Jian & Zhang, Hualiang & Gao, Qing & Tan, Chunqing, 2019. "Thermodynamic evaluation of the novel distillation column of the air separation unit with integration of liquefied natural gas (LNG) regasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 341-359.
    6. McLarty, Dustin & Brouwer, Jack, 2014. "Poly-generating closed cathode fuel cell with carbon capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 108-116.
    7. Zonouz, Masood Jalali & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2017. "Parametric study of a hybrid one column air separation unit (ASU) and CO2 power cycle based on advanced exergy cost analysis results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 261-275.
    8. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Moftakhari Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi & Rosen, Marc A., 2015. "Optimum design and exergy analysis of a novel cryogenic air separation process with LNG (liquefied natural gas) cold energy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 2047-2069.
    9. Fu, Qian & Kansha, Yasuki & Song, Chunfeng & Liu, Yuping & Ishizuka, Masanori & Tsutsumi, Atsushi, 2016. "A cryogenic air separation process based on self-heat recuperation for oxy-combustion plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1114-1121.
    10. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2022. "Liquid air as an emerging energy vector towards carbon neutrality: A multi-scale systems perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    11. Gupta, Sapna & Adams, Joseph J. & Wilson, Jamie R. & Eddings, Eric G. & Mahapatra, Manoj K. & Singh, Prabhakar, 2016. "Performance and post-test characterization of an OTM system in an experimental coal gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 72-80.
    12. Yu, Haoshui & Gundersen, Truls & Feng, Xiao, 2018. "Process integration of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and heat pump for low temperature waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 330-340.
    13. Li, Chunxi & Guo, Shiqi & Ye, Xuemin & Fu, Wenfeng, 2019. "Performance and thermoeconomics of solar-aided double-reheat coal-fired power systems with carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-15.
    14. Seo, Su Been & Kim, Hyung Woo & Kang, Seo Yeong & Go, Eun Sol & Keel, Sang In & Lee, See Hoon, 2021. "Techno-economic comparison between air-fired and oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed power plants with ultra-supercritical cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    15. Kazemi, Abolghasem & Mehrabani-Zeinabad, Arjomand & Beheshti, Masoud, 2018. "Recently developed heat pump assisted distillation configurations: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1261-1281.
    16. Habib, Mohamed A. & Salaudeen, Shakirudeen A. & Nemitallah, Medhat A. & Ben-Mansour, R. & Mokheimer, Esmail M.A., 2016. "Numerical investigation of syngas oxy-combustion inside a LSCF-6428 oxygen transport membrane reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 654-665.
    17. Fu, Chao & Gundersen, Truls, 2013. "Recuperative vapor recompression heat pumps in cryogenic air separation processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 708-718.
    18. Muhammad Haris Hamayun & Naveed Ramzan & Murid Hussain & Muhammad Faheem, 2020. "Evaluation of Two-Column Air Separation Processes Based on Exergy Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Bailera, Manuel & Lisbona, Pilar & Romeo, Luis M. & Espatolero, Sergio, 2016. "Power to Gas–biomass oxycombustion hybrid system: Energy integration and potential applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 221-229.
    20. Sachajdak, Andrzej & Lappalainen, Jari & Mikkonen, Hannu, 2019. "Dynamic simulation in development of contemporary energy systems – oxy combustion case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 964-973.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:152:y:2018:i:c:p:313-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.