IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v233y2021ics0360544221014651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic comparison between air-fired and oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed power plants with ultra-supercritical cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Seo, Su Been
  • Kim, Hyung Woo
  • Kang, Seo Yeong
  • Go, Eun Sol
  • Keel, Sang In
  • Lee, See Hoon

Abstract

Oxy-fuel combustion technology can be a solution for reducing emission of environmental pollutants because it can reduce nitrogen oxides and CO2 emissions by using oxygen rather than air as an oxidant. Incorporating the ultra-supercritical steam cycle into oxy-fuel combustion technology can result in a highly efficient and eco-friendly power generation technology, but it is essential to install additional equipment for the oxygen production and CO2 treatment. This results in an energy penalty of 8.41% and a 64% increase in capital cost compared to an air-fuel power plant, so that the air-fuel power plant's levelized cost of electricity is advantageous. However, the introduction of carbon credits trading system shows that oxy-fuel power plants are economically feasible and comparable with air-fuel power plants. The profitability and sensitivity analysis shows that the net present value and internal rate of return of oxy-fuel power plants are 2.3 times and 1.15 times larger than that of air-fuel power plant, respectively, and the payback period is reached after 12 years. According to the sensitivity analysis, fuel cost was the most sensitive factor in both types of power plants but for oxy-fuel power plants the capital cost was as sensitive as fuel cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Seo, Su Been & Kim, Hyung Woo & Kang, Seo Yeong & Go, Eun Sol & Keel, Sang In & Lee, See Hoon, 2021. "Techno-economic comparison between air-fired and oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed power plants with ultra-supercritical cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:233:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221014651
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221014651
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Song, Tae-Ho & Lim, Kyoung-Min & Yoo, Seung-Hoon, 2015. "Estimating the public’s value of implementing the CO2 emissions trading scheme in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 82-86.
    2. Vu, Thang Toan & Lim, Young-Il & Song, Daesung & Mun, Tae-Young & Moon, Ji-Hong & Sun, Dowon & Hwang, Yoon-Tae & Lee, Jae-Goo & Park, Young Cheol, 2020. "Techno-economic analysis of ultra-supercritical power plants using air- and oxy-combustion circulating fluidized bed with and without CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    3. Park, Hojeong & Hong, Won Kyung, 2014. "Korea׳s emission trading scheme and policy design issues to achieve market-efficiency and abatement targets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 73-83.
    4. Ebrahimi, Armin & Meratizaman, Mousa & Akbarpour Reyhani, Hamed & Pourali, Omid & Amidpour, Majid, 2015. "Energetic, exergetic and economic assessment of oxygen production from two columns cryogenic air separation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1298-1316.
    5. Moon, Ji-Hong & Jo, Sung-Ho & Park, Sung Jin & Khoi, Nguyen Hoang & Seo, Myung Won & Ra, Ho Won & Yoon, Sang-Jun & Yoon, Sung-Min & Lee, Jae-Goo & Mun, Tae-Young, 2019. "Carbon dioxide purity and combustion characteristics of oxy firing compared to air firing in a pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 183-192.
    6. Zhao, Tian & Liu, Zhixin, 2019. "A novel analysis of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology adoption: An evolutionary game model between stakeholders," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Qi, Tianyu & Weng, Yuyan, 2016. "Economic impacts of an international carbon market in achieving the INDC targets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 886-893.
    8. Hu, Yukun & Li, Xun & Li, Hailong & Yan, Jinyue, 2013. "Peak and off-peak operations of the air separation unit in oxy-coal combustion power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 747-754.
    9. Lee, See Hoon & Lee, Tae Hee & Jeong, Sang Mun & Lee, Jong Min, 2019. "Economic analysis of a 600 mwe ultra supercritical circulating fluidized bed power plant based on coal tax and biomass co-combustion plans," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 121-127.
    10. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Tola, Vittorio & Cau, Giorgio, 2017. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 426-439.
    11. Hanak, Dawid P. & Powell, Dante & Manovic, Vasilije, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of oxy-combustion coal-fired power plant with cryogenic oxygen storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 193-203.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seo, Su Been & Go, Eun Sol & Ling, Jester Lih Jie & Lee, See Hoon, 2022. "Techno-economic assessment of a solar-assisted biomass gasification process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 23-31.
    2. Ling, Jester Lih Jie & Yang, Won & Park, Han Saem & Lee, Ha Eun & Lee, See Hoon, 2023. "A comparative review on advanced biomass oxygen fuel combustion technologies for carbon capture and storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    3. Kazemi, Abolghasem & Moreno, Jovita & Iribarren, Diego, 2022. "Techno-economic comparison of optimized natural gas combined cycle power plants with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    4. Zhang, Xiaoyu & Zhu, Shujun & Zhu, Jianguo & Liu, Yuhua & Zhang, Jiahang & Hui, Jicheng & Ding, Hongliang & Cao, Xiaoyang & Lyu, Qinggang, 2023. "Preheating and combustion characteristics of anthracite under O2/N2, O2/CO2 and O2/CO2/H2O atmospheres," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    5. Nhuchhen, Daya R. & Sit, Song P. & Layzell, David B., 2022. "Decarbonization of cement production in a hydrogen economy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    6. Chen, Yuyang & Yang, Shiliang & Hu, Jianhang & Wang, Hua, 2023. "Investigation of the oxy-fuel combustion process in the full-loop circulating fluidized bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    7. Ling, Jester Lih Jie & Oh, Seung Seok & Park, Hyun Jun & Lee, See Hoon, 2023. "Process simulation and economic evaluation of a biomass oxygen fuel circulating fluidized bed combustor with an indirect supercritical carbon dioxide cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vu, Thang Toan & Lim, Young-Il & Song, Daesung & Mun, Tae-Young & Moon, Ji-Hong & Sun, Dowon & Hwang, Yoon-Tae & Lee, Jae-Goo & Park, Young Cheol, 2020. "Techno-economic analysis of ultra-supercritical power plants using air- and oxy-combustion circulating fluidized bed with and without CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2022. "Liquid air as an emerging energy vector towards carbon neutrality: A multi-scale systems perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2018. "Techno-Economic Evaluations of Copper-Based Chemical Looping Air Separation System for Oxy-Combustion and Gasification Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    4. García-Luna, S. & Ortiz, C. & Carro, A. & Chacartegui, R. & Pérez-Maqueda, L.A., 2022. "Oxygen production routes assessment for oxy-fuel combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    5. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Magiri-Skouloudi, Despina & Grimekis, Dimitrios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Εnergy-exergy analysis of ultra-supercritical biomass-fuelled steam power plants for industrial CHP, district heating and cooling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 252-269.
    6. Tafone, Alessio & Dal Magro, Fabio & Romagnoli, Alessandro, 2018. "Integrating an oxygen enriched waste to energy plant with cryogenic engines and Air Separation Unit: Technical, economic and environmental analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 423-432.
    7. Zonouz, Masood Jalali & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2017. "Parametric study of a hybrid one column air separation unit (ASU) and CO2 power cycle based on advanced exergy cost analysis results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 261-275.
    8. Fu, Yue & Wang, Liyuan & Liu, Ming & Wang, Jinshi & Yan, Junjie, 2023. "Performance analysis of coal-fired power plants integrated with carbon capture system under load-cycling operation conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    9. Zhou, Linfei & Duan, Lunbo & Anthony, Edward John, 2019. "A calcium looping process for simultaneous CO2 capture and peak shaving in a coal-fired power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 480-486.
    10. Dongmin Son & Joonrak Kim & Bongju Jeong, 2019. "Optimal Operational Strategy for Power Producers in Korea Considering Renewable Portfolio Standards and Emissions Trading Schemes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-24, May.
    11. Choi, Yongrok & Liu, Yu & Lee, Hyoungseok, 2017. "The economy impacts of Korean ETS with an emphasis on sectoral coverage based on a CGE approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 835-844.
    12. Ling, Jester Lih Jie & Oh, Seung Seok & Park, Hyun Jun & Lee, See Hoon, 2023. "Process simulation and economic evaluation of a biomass oxygen fuel circulating fluidized bed combustor with an indirect supercritical carbon dioxide cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    13. Huang, Qingxi & Yao, Jinduo & Hu, Yukun & Liu, Shengchun & Li, Hailong & Sun, Qie, 2022. "Integrating compressed CO2 energy storage in an oxy-coal combustion power plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    14. Kim, Hyung Woo & Seo, Su Been & Kang, Seo Yeong & Go, Eun Sol & Oh, Seung Seok & Lee, YongWoon & Yang, Won & Lee, See Hoon, 2021. "Effect of flue gas recirculation on efficiency of an indirect supercritical CO2 oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    15. de Perthuis, Christian & Trotignon, Raphael, 2014. "Governance of CO2 markets: Lessons from the EU ETS," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 100-106.
    16. Ebrahimi, Armin & Ghorbani, Bahram & Ziabasharhagh, Masoud, 2020. "Introducing a novel integrated cogeneration system of power and cooling using stored liquefied natural gas as a cryogenic energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    17. Heo, SungKu & Byun, Jaewon & Ifaei, Pouya & Ko, Jaerak & Ha, Byeongmin & Hwangbo, Soonho & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2024. "Towards mega-scale decarbonized industrial park (Mega-DIP): Generative AI-driven techno-economic and environmental assessment of renewable and sustainable energy utilization in petrochemical industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    18. Chen, Yuhong & Lyu, Yanfeng & Yang, Xiangdong & Zhang, Xiaohong & Pan, Hengyu & Wu, Jun & Lei, Yongjia & Zhang, Yanzong & Wang, Guiyin & Xu, Min & Luo, Hongbin, 2022. "Performance comparison of urea production using one set of integrated indicators considering energy use, economic cost and emissions’ impacts: A case from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    19. Liu, Jicheng & Sun, Jiakang & Yuan, Hanying & Su, Yihan & Feng, Shuxian & Lu, Chaoran, 2022. "Behavior analysis of photovoltaic-storage-use value chain game evolution in blockchain environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    20. Vega, F. & Baena-Moreno, F.M. & Gallego Fernández, Luz M. & Portillo, E. & Navarrete, B. & Zhang, Zhien, 2020. "Current status of CO2 chemical absorption research applied to CCS: Towards full deployment at industrial scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:233:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221014651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.