IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v90y2015ip2p1298-1316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energetic, exergetic and economic assessment of oxygen production from two columns cryogenic air separation unit

Author

Listed:
  • Ebrahimi, Armin
  • Meratizaman, Mousa
  • Akbarpour Reyhani, Hamed
  • Pourali, Omid
  • Amidpour, Majid

Abstract

Oxygen is one of the important industrial gases indubitably. Industrial operations take advantage of the reactive properties of oxygen in order to manufacture products as efficient and cost-effective as possible. Oxygen is involved in most industrial processes in which combustion or chemical reactions play a role (from steelmaking to water treatment). Distillation of air (air separation) is currently the most commonly used technique for production of pure oxygen and nitrogen on an industrial scale. In this article, energetic, exergetic and economic assessments of two columns cryogenic air separation are considered. For this purpose, a two columns cryogenic air separation unit is simulated. Then using simulation data, energetic and exergetic and economic analyses are performed. Annualized cost of system is chosen as an economic approach. Sensitivity analyses of economic parameters against utility prices and cost of product in the market are investigated. Results of exergy analysis show that the compression and distillation units with 34.48 and 52.89 percent of total exergy destruction are the main exergy destructive components respectively. It also shows that in the current economic condition, the suggested system is economically feasible in the size of 9 kg/sec O2 and more than it.

Suggested Citation

  • Ebrahimi, Armin & Meratizaman, Mousa & Akbarpour Reyhani, Hamed & Pourali, Omid & Amidpour, Majid, 2015. "Energetic, exergetic and economic assessment of oxygen production from two columns cryogenic air separation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1298-1316.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:90:y:2015:i:p2:p:1298-1316
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544215008397
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhattacharya, Atmadeep & Das, Anirban & Datta, Amitava, 2014. "Exergy based performance analysis of hydrogen production from rice straw using oxygen blown gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 525-533.
    2. Kotowicz, Janusz & Michalski, Sebastian, 2014. "Efficiency analysis of a hard-coal-fired supercritical power plant with a four-end high-temperature membrane for air separation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 109-119.
    3. Querol, E. & Gonzalez-Regueral, B. & Ramos, A. & Perez-Benedito, J.L., 2011. "Novel application for exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of processes simulated with Aspen Plus®," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 964-974.
    4. van der Ham, L.V. & Kjelstrup, S., 2010. "Exergy analysis of two cryogenic air separation processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4731-4739.
    5. Fu, Chao & Gundersen, Truls, 2013. "Recuperative vapor recompression heat pumps in cryogenic air separation processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 708-718.
    6. Hu, Yukun & Li, Xun & Li, Hailong & Yan, Jinyue, 2013. "Peak and off-peak operations of the air separation unit in oxy-coal combustion power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 747-754.
    7. Rivarolo, M. & Magistri, L. & Massardo, A.F., 2014. "Hydrogen and methane generation from large hydraulic plant: Thermo-economic multi-level time-dependent optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1737-1745.
    8. Clausen, Lasse R. & Elmegaard, Brian & Houbak, Niels, 2010. "Technoeconomic analysis of a low CO2 emission dimethyl ether (DME) plant based on gasification of torrefied biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4831-4842.
    9. Rahimi, Sahand & Meratizaman, Mousa & Monadizadeh, Sina & Amidpour, Majid, 2014. "Techno-economic analysis of wind turbine–PEM (polymer electrolyte membrane) fuel cell hybrid system in standalone area," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 381-396.
    10. Wei, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Bingjian & Wu, Shengyuan & Chen, Qinglin & Tsatsaronis, George, 2012. "Energy-use analysis and evaluation of distillation systems through avoidable exergy destruction and investment costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 424-433.
    11. Sayyaadi, Hoseyn & Mehrabipour, Reza, 2012. "Efficiency enhancement of a gas turbine cycle using an optimized tubular recuperative heat exchanger," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 362-375.
    12. Fu, Chao & Gundersen, Truls, 2012. "Using exergy analysis to reduce power consumption in air separation units for oxy-combustion processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 60-68.
    13. Galanti, Leandro & Massardo, Aristide F., 2011. "Micro gas turbine thermodynamic and economic analysis up to 500kWe size," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4795-4802.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ebrahimi, Armin & Ziabasharhagh, Masoud, 2017. "Optimal design and integration of a cryogenic Air Separation Unit (ASU) with Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) as heat sink, thermodynamic and economic analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 868-885.
    2. Reyhani, Hamed Akbarpour & Meratizaman, Mousa & Ebrahimi, Armin & Pourali, Omid & Amidpour, Majid, 2016. "Thermodynamic and economic optimization of SOFC-GT and its cogeneration opportunities using generated syngas from heavy fuel oil gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 141-164.
    3. Jin, Bo & Zhao, Haibo & Zheng, Chuguang & Liang, Zhiwu, 2018. "Control optimization to achieve energy-efficient operation of the air separation unit in oxy-fuel combustion power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 313-321.
    4. Piadehrouhi, Forough & Ghorbani, Bahram & Miansari, Mehdi & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2019. "Development of a new integrated structure for simultaneous generation of power and liquid carbon dioxide using solar dish collectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 938-959.
    5. Zonouz, Masood Jalali & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2017. "Parametric study of a hybrid one column air separation unit (ASU) and CO2 power cycle based on advanced exergy cost analysis results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 261-275.
    6. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Moftakhari Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi & Rosen, Marc A., 2015. "Optimum design and exergy analysis of a novel cryogenic air separation process with LNG (liquefied natural gas) cold energy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 2047-2069.
    7. Fu, Qian & Kansha, Yasuki & Song, Chunfeng & Liu, Yuping & Ishizuka, Masanori & Tsutsumi, Atsushi, 2016. "A cryogenic air separation process based on self-heat recuperation for oxy-combustion plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1114-1121.
    8. Muhammad Haris Hamayun & Naveed Ramzan & Murid Hussain & Muhammad Faheem, 2020. "Evaluation of Two-Column Air Separation Processes Based on Exergy Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Mohammadi, Amin & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2018. "A comprehensive review on coupling different types of electrolyzer to renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 632-655.
    10. Chen, Shiqing & Dong, Xuezhi & Xu, Jian & Zhang, Hualiang & Gao, Qing & Tan, Chunqing, 2019. "Thermodynamic evaluation of the novel distillation column of the air separation unit with integration of liquefied natural gas (LNG) regasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 341-359.
    11. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    12. McLarty, Dustin & Brouwer, Jack, 2014. "Poly-generating closed cathode fuel cell with carbon capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 108-116.
    13. Meratizaman, Mousa & Monadizadeh, Sina & Tohidi Sardasht, Mohammad & Amidpour, Majid, 2015. "Techno economic and environmental assessment of using gasification process in order to mitigate the emission in the available steam power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-14.
    14. Abdollahipour, Armin & Sayyaadi, Hoseyn, 2022. "Optimal design of a hybrid power generation system based on integrating PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer as a moderator for micro-renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    15. Singla, Rohit & Chowdhury, Kanchan, 2020. "Saving power by modifying a double column air separation plant to produce high and low purity pressurized gaseous oxygen simultaneously," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    16. Guandalini, Giulio & Campanari, Stefano & Romano, Matteo C., 2015. "Power-to-gas plants and gas turbines for improved wind energy dispatchability: Energy and economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 117-130.
    17. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2022. "Liquid air as an emerging energy vector towards carbon neutrality: A multi-scale systems perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    18. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Zhao, Xinyue & Chen, Heng & Zheng, Qiwei & Liu, Jun & Pan, Peiyuan & Xu, Gang & Zhao, Qinxin & Jiang, Xue, 2023. "Thermo-economic analysis of a novel hydrogen production system using medical waste and biogas with zero carbon emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    20. Gupta, Sapna & Adams, Joseph J. & Wilson, Jamie R. & Eddings, Eric G. & Mahapatra, Manoj K. & Singh, Prabhakar, 2016. "Performance and post-test characterization of an OTM system in an experimental coal gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 72-80.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:90:y:2015:i:p2:p:1298-1316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.