IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v37y2009i3p915-924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Chao
  • Rubin, Edward S.

Abstract

As part of the USDOE's Carbon Sequestration Program, an integrated modeling framework has been developed to evaluate the performance and cost of alternative carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies for fossil-fueled power plants in the context of multi-pollutant control requirements. This paper uses the newly developed model of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant to analyze the effects of adding CCS to an IGCC system employing a GE quench gasifier with water gas shift reactors and a Selexol system for CO2 capture. Parameters of interest include the effects on plant performance and cost of varying the CO2 removal efficiency, the quality and cost of coal, and selected other factors affecting overall plant performance and cost. The stochastic simulation capability of the model is also used to illustrate the effect of uncertainties or variability in key process and cost parameters. The potential for advanced oxygen production and gas turbine technologies to reduce the cost and environmental impacts of IGCC with CCS is also analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Chao & Rubin, Edward S., 2009. "CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 915-924, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:37:y:2009:i:3:p:915-924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-4215(08)00565-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frey, H.Christopher & Rubin, Edward S. & Diwekar, Urmila M., 1994. "Modeling uncertainties in advanced technologies: Application to a coal gasification system with hot-gas cleanup," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 449-463.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicholas S. Siefert & Sarah Narburgh & Yang Chen, 2016. "Comprehensive Exergy Analysis of Three IGCC Power Plant Configurations with CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Franz, Johannes & Maas, Pascal & Scherer, Viktor, 2014. "Economic evaluation of pre-combustion CO2-capture in IGCC power plants by porous ceramic membranes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 532-542.
    3. Nakaten, Natalie & Schlüter, Ralph & Azzam, Rafig & Kempka, Thomas, 2014. "Development of a techno-economic model for dynamic calculation of cost of electricity, energy demand and CO2 emissions of an integrated UCG–CCS process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 779-790.
    4. Park, Kyungtae & Shin, Dongil & Yoon, En Sup, 2011. "The cost of energy analysis and energy planning for emerging, fossil fuel power plants based on the climate change scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3606-3612.
    5. Siefert, Nicholas S. & Litster, Shawn, 2013. "Exergy and economic analyses of advanced IGCC–CCS and IGFC–CCS power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 315-328.
    6. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Eide, Jan & de Sisternes, Fernando J. & Herzog, Howard J. & Webster, Mort D., 2014. "CO2 emission standards and investment in carbon capture," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 53-65.
    8. Li, Sheng & Zhang, Xiaosong & Gao, Lin & Jin, Hongguang, 2012. "Learning rates and future cost curves for fossil fuel energy systems with CO2 capture: Methodology and case studies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 348-356.
    9. Luis M. Abadie & José M. Chamorro, 2009. "The Economics of Gasification: A Market-Based Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-33, August.
    10. Cristina Aracil & Ángel L. Villanueva Perales & Jacopo Giuntoli & Jorge Cristóbal & Pedro Haro, 2023. "The Role of Renewable-Derived Plastics in the Analysis of Waste Management Schemes: A Time-Dependent Carbon Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Cao, Yang & He, Boshu & Ding, Guangchao & Su, Liangbin & Duan, Zhipeng, 2017. "Energy and exergy investigation on two improved IGCC power plants with different CO2 capture schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 47-57.
    12. Melchior, Tobias & Madlener, Reinhard, 2012. "Economic evaluation of IGCC plants with hot gas cleaning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 170-184.
    13. Esmaili, Ehsan & Mostafavi, Ehsan & Mahinpey, Nader, 2016. "Economic assessment of integrated coal gasification combined cycle with sorbent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 341-352.
    14. Juzheng Zhang & Michel‐Alexandre Cardin & Nikolaos Kazantzis & Simon K. K. Ng & Y. H. Ma, 2015. "Economic Evaluation of Flexibility in the Design of IGCC Plants with Integrated Membrane Reactor Modules," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 208-227, March.
    15. Bowen, Frances, 2011. "Carbon capture and storage as a corporate technology strategy challenge," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2256-2264, May.
    16. Luis Puigjaner & Mar Pérez-Fortes & José M. Laínez-Aguirre, 2015. "Towards a Carbon-Neutral Energy Sector: Opportunities and Challenges of Coordinated Bioenergy Supply Chains-A PSE Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-48, June.
    17. Akbilgic, Oguz & Doluweera, Ganesh & Mahmoudkhani, Maryam & Bergerson, Joule, 2015. "A meta-analysis of carbon capture and storage technology assessments: Understanding the driving factors of variability in cost estimates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 11-18.
    18. Bazmi, Aqeel Ahmed & Zahedi, Gholamreza, 2011. "Sustainable energy systems: Role of optimization modeling techniques in power generation and supply—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3480-3500.
    19. Mansouri Majoumerd, Mohammad & Raas, Han & De, Sudipta & Assadi, Mohsen, 2014. "Estimation of performance variation of future generation IGCC with coal quality and gasification process – Simulation results of EU H2-IGCC project," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 452-462.
    20. Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Woo-Sung & Ju, Youngsan & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance evaluation and carbon assessment of IGCC power plant with coal quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    21. Park, Sung Ho & Lee, Seung Jong & Lee, Jin Wook & Chun, Sung Nam & Lee, Jung Bin, 2015. "The quantitative evaluation of two-stage pre-combustion CO2 capture processes using the physical solvents with various design parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-55.
    22. Zhang, Jianyun & Zhou, Zhe & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng & Ni, Weidou, 2013. "Efficiency of wet feed IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) systems with coal–water slurry preheating vaporization technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 137-145.
    23. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Chen, Shu-Mi & Hung, Chen-I, 2013. "Carbon dioxide capture by single droplet using Selexol, Rectisol and water as absorbents: A theoretical approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 731-741.
    24. Tola, Vittorio & Pettinau, Alberto, 2014. "Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: A techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1461-1474.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bright, Ryan M. & H. Strømman, Anders, 2010. "Incentivizing wood-based Fischer-Tropsch diesel through financial policy instruments: An economic assessment for Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 6849-6859, November.
    2. Jaber, J. O. & Probert, S. D. & Williams, P. T., 1998. "Modelling oil-shale integrated tri-generator behaviour: predicted performance and financial assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(2-3), pages 73-95, February.
    3. Juzheng Zhang & Michel‐Alexandre Cardin & Nikolaos Kazantzis & Simon K. K. Ng & Y. H. Ma, 2015. "Economic Evaluation of Flexibility in the Design of IGCC Plants with Integrated Membrane Reactor Modules," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 208-227, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    IGCC CCS Uncertainty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:37:y:2009:i:3:p:915-924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.