IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v66y2014icp779-790.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a techno-economic model for dynamic calculation of cost of electricity, energy demand and CO2 emissions of an integrated UCG–CCS process

Author

Listed:
  • Nakaten, Natalie
  • Schlüter, Ralph
  • Azzam, Rafig
  • Kempka, Thomas

Abstract

Underground coal gasification (UCG) allows for the utilization of coal reserves not exploitable due to unfavorable geology and economic boundary conditions. The present study examines underground coal gasification economics converting deep-situated coals into a high-calorific UCG synthesis gas. Utilizing UCG synthesis gas to fuel a combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) considering CO2 capture and its subsequent storage (CCS) in the underground voids resulting from coal consumption, the coupled process offers an economic low carbon option to coal fired power generation for a study area in Bulgaria. The selected coal deposit is not suitable for conventional mining due to great depths, but it may be exploitable by UCG. Cost-effectiveness, CO2 emissions and energy demand of the coupled process are analyzed using a techno-economic model specifically developed for that purpose. Capital and operational expenditure are ascertained from calculations considering six dynamic sub-models describing the UCG-CCGT-CCS process flow and aiming at determination of the costs of electricity (COE). Calculation results show that COE account to 71.67 €/MWh considering 20.5% CCS costs and 79.5% emission charges. The results show that the coupled UCG-CCGT-CCS process should be considered as an economic and low carbon option for power generation for the selected study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Nakaten, Natalie & Schlüter, Ralph & Azzam, Rafig & Kempka, Thomas, 2014. "Development of a techno-economic model for dynamic calculation of cost of electricity, energy demand and CO2 emissions of an integrated UCG–CCS process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 779-790.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:66:y:2014:i:c:p:779-790
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544214000218
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carapellucci, Roberto & Giordano, Lorena, 2013. "A comparison between exergetic and economic criteria for optimizing the heat recovery steam generators of gas-steam power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 458-472.
    2. Alexander Y. Klimenko, 2009. "Early Ideas in Underground Coal Gasification and Their Evolution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Hammond, G.P. & Akwe, S.S. Ondo & Williams, S., 2011. "Techno-economic appraisal of fossil-fuelled power generation systems with carbon dioxide capture and storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 975-984.
    4. Zhang, Jianyun & Zhou, Zhe & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng & Ni, Weidou, 2013. "Efficiency of wet feed IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) systems with coal–water slurry preheating vaporization technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 137-145.
    5. Li, Hailong & Ditaranto, Mario & Berstad, David, 2011. "Technologies for increasing CO2 concentration in exhaust gas from natural gas-fired power production with post-combustion, amine-based CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 1124-1133.
    6. Prabu, V. & Jayanti, S., 2011. "Simulation of cavity formation in underground coal gasification using bore hole combustion experiments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5854-5864.
    7. Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Janusz-Szymańska, Katarzyna & Kotowicz, Janusz, 2012. "Modeling and analysis of selected carbon dioxide capture methods in IGCC systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 92-100.
    8. Eftekhari, Ali Akbar & Van Der Kooi, Hedzer & Bruining, Hans, 2012. "Exergy analysis of underground coal gasification with simultaneous storage of carbon dioxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 729-745.
    9. Marbe, Âsa & Harvey, Simon & Berntsson, Thore, 2006. "Technical, environmental and economic analysis of co-firing of gasified biofuel in a natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) combined heat and power (CHP) plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1614-1631.
    10. Gandiglio, M. & Lanzini, A. & Leone, P. & Santarelli, M. & Borchiellini, R., 2013. "Thermoeconomic analysis of large solid oxide fuel cell plants: Atmospheric vs. pressurized performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 142-155.
    11. McCollum, David L & Ogden, Joan M, 2006. "Techno-Economic Models for Carbon Dioxide Compression, Transport, and Storage & Correlations for Estimating Carbon Dioxide Density and Viscosity," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1zg00532, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    12. Chen, Chao & Rubin, Edward S., 2009. "CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 915-924, March.
    13. Gerbelová, Hana & Versteeg, Peter & Ioakimidis, Christos S. & Ferrão, Paulo, 2013. "The effect of retrofitting Portuguese fossil fuel power plants with CCS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 280-287.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Verma, Aman & Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2015. "Greenhouse gas abatement costs of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 556-568.
    2. Fa-qiang Su & Akihiro Hamanaka & Ken-ichi Itakura & Gota Deguchi & Wenyan Zhang & Hua Nan, 2018. "Evaluation of a Compact Coaxial Underground Coal Gasification System Inside an Artificial Coal Seam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Xin, Lin & An, Mingyu & Feng, Mingze & Li, Kaixuan & Cheng, Weimin & Liu, Weitao & Hu, Xiangming & Wang, Zhigang & Han, Limin, 2021. "Study on pyrolysis characteristics of lump coal in the context of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    4. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2015. "Thermo-Mechanical Simulations of Rock Behavior in Underground Coal Gasification Show Negligible Impact of Temperature-Dependent Parameters on Permeability Changes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2017. "Prediction of Steam Jacket Dynamics and Water Balances in Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Onyebuchi, V.E. & Kolios, A. & Hanak, D.P. & Biliyok, C. & Manovic, V., 2018. "A systematic review of key challenges of CO2 transport via pipelines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2563-2583.
    7. Sen, Parag & Roy, Mousumi & Pal, Parimal, 2016. "Application of ARIMA for forecasting energy consumption and GHG emission: A case study of an Indian pig iron manufacturing organization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 1031-1038.
    8. Krzysztof Kapusta & Marian Wiatowski & Krzysztof Stańczyk & Renato Zagorščak & Hywel Rhys Thomas, 2020. "Large-scale Experimental Investigations to Evaluate the Feasibility of Producing Methane-Rich Gas (SNG) through Underground Coal Gasification Process. Effect of Coal Rank and Gasification Pressure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Feng, Ye & Chen, Jinglong & Luo, Ji, 2024. "Life cycle cost analysis of power generation from underground coal gasification with carbon capture and storage (CCS) to measure the economic feasibility," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Eftekhari, Ali Akbar & Wolf, Karl Heinz & Rogut, Jan & Bruining, Hans, 2017. "Energy and exergy analysis of alternating injection of oxygen and steam in the low emission underground gasification of deep thin coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 62-71.
    11. Sungki Kim & Wonil Ko & Sungsig Bang, 2015. "Analysis of Unit Process Cost for an Engineering-Scale Pyroprocess Facility Using a Process Costing Method in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Ma, Jianli & Li, Qi & Kühn, Michael & Nakaten, Natalie, 2018. "Power-to-gas based subsurface energy storage: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 478-496.
    13. Liu, Huan & Guo, Wei & Liu, Shuqin, 2022. "Comparative techno-economic performance analysis of underground coal gasification and surface coal gasification based coal-to-hydrogen process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    14. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    15. Natalie Nakaten & Thomas Kempka, 2019. "Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalie Nakaten & Thomas Kempka, 2019. "Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, August.
    2. Natalie Christine Nakaten & Thomas Kempka, 2017. "RETRACTED: Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1, October.
    3. Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification (UCG) in Western Canada with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for upgrading bitumen from oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 428-440.
    4. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2015. "Thermo-Mechanical Simulations of Rock Behavior in Underground Coal Gasification Show Negligible Impact of Temperature-Dependent Parameters on Permeability Changes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Rohlfs, Wilko & Madlener, Reinhard, 2013. "Assessment of clean-coal strategies: The questionable merits of carbon capture-readiness," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 27-36.
    6. Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Woo-Sung & Ju, Youngsan & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance evaluation and carbon assessment of IGCC power plant with coal quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Ziębik, Andrzej & Malik, Tomasz & Liszka, Marcin, 2015. "Thermodynamic evaluation of CHP (combined heat and power) plants integrated with installations of coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P2), pages 179-188.
    8. Adams, T. & Mac Dowell, N., 2016. "Off-design point modelling of a 420MW CCGT power plant integrated with an amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture and compression process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 681-702.
    9. Zhang, Jianyun & Zhou, Zhe & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng & Ni, Weidou, 2013. "Efficiency of wet feed IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) systems with coal–water slurry preheating vaporization technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 137-145.
    10. Md M. Khan & Joseph P. Mmbaga & Ahad S. Shirazi & Japan Trivedi & Qingzia Liu & Rajender Gupta, 2015. "Modelling Underground Coal Gasification—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-66, November.
    11. Yao, Xing & Zhong, Ping & Zhang, Xian & Zhu, Lei, 2018. "Business model design for the carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) project in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 519-533.
    12. Yuteng Xiao & Jihang Yin & Yifan Hu & Junzhe Wang & Hongsheng Yin & Honggang Qi, 2019. "Monitoring and Control in Underground Coal Gasification: Current Research Status and Future Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Yi, Qun & Feng, Jie & Wu, Yanli & Li, Wenying, 2014. "3E (energy, environmental, and economy) evaluation and assessment to an innovative dual-gas polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 285-294.
    14. Esmaili, Ehsan & Mostafavi, Ehsan & Mahinpey, Nader, 2016. "Economic assessment of integrated coal gasification combined cycle with sorbent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 341-352.
    15. Carapellucci, Roberto & Giordano, Lorena & Vaccarelli, Maura, 2017. "Application of an amine-based CO2 capture system in retrofitting combined gas-steam power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 808-826.
    16. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    17. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Hou, Yu-Lin & Hung, Chen-I., 2012. "A study of influence of acoustic excitation on carbon dioxide capture by a droplet," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 311-321.
    18. Kim, Young Sik & Park, Sung Ku & Lee, Jong Jun & Kang, Do Won & Kim, Tong Seop, 2013. "Analysis of the impact of gas turbine modifications in integrated gasification combined cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 977-986.
    19. Park, Sung Ho & Lee, Seung Jong & Lee, Jin Wook & Chun, Sung Nam & Lee, Jung Bin, 2015. "The quantitative evaluation of two-stage pre-combustion CO2 capture processes using the physical solvents with various design parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-55.
    20. Tola, Vittorio & Pettinau, Alberto, 2014. "Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: A techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1461-1474.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:66:y:2014:i:c:p:779-790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.