IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v312y2024i1p240-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network revenue management game in the railway industry: Stackelberg equilibrium, global optimality, and mechanism design

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Dongjun
  • Islam, Dewan Md Zahurul
  • Robinson, Mark
  • Song, Dong-Ping
  • Dong, Jing-Xin
  • Reimann, Marc

Abstract

Many countries have adopted the vertical separation governance structure in the railway freight industry over the past decades. Under this governance structure, an Infrastructure Manager (IM), which might be an independent company or a government agency, sells train itineraries to Freight Operating Companies (FOCs). After purchasing the itineraries, a FOC will have the rights to run trains on the designated paths at the designated times and thus can provide transport service to shippers. In the process, an IM needs to determine a list of prices for their train itineraries; and a FOC needs to determine which train itineraries to purchase to serve uncertain customer demands based on the IM's price list. This study considers the interaction between an IM and a FOC as a network-based Stackelberg game. Our study first formulates a bi-level optimisation model to determine the equilibrium prices that the IM would charge to maximise its own profits unilaterally without collaboration. A method involving gradient and local search has been developed to solve the bi-level model. Secondly, an inverse optimisation model is proposed to determine the prices leading to global optimality. A Fenchel cutting plane-based algorithm is developed to solve the inverse optimisation model. Thirdly, a subsidy contract is designed for the game to coordinate the players’ decisions. A two-layer gradient search method is developed to determine the optimal subsidy rate. Numerical cases based on the UK rail freight industry data are provided to validate the models and algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Dongjun & Islam, Dewan Md Zahurul & Robinson, Mark & Song, Dong-Ping & Dong, Jing-Xin & Reimann, Marc, 2024. "Network revenue management game in the railway industry: Stackelberg equilibrium, global optimality, and mechanism design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 240-254.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:312:y:2024:i:1:p:240-254
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.06.044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221723005362
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.06.044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martine Labbé & Patrice Marcotte & Gilles Savard, 1998. "A Bilevel Model of Taxation and Its Application to Optimal Highway Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-1), pages 1608-1622, December.
    2. Lin, Bo-Liang & Wang, Zhi-Mei & Ji, Li-Jun & Tian, Ya-Ming & Zhou, Guo-Qing, 2012. "Optimizing the freight train connection service network of a large-scale rail system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 649-667.
    3. A. Ciancimino & G. Inzerillo & S. Lucidi & L. Palagi, 1999. "A Mathematical Programming Approach for the Solution of the Railway Yield Management Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 168-181, May.
    4. Alexander Armstrong & Joern Meissner, 2010. "Railway Revenue Management: Overview and Models (Operations Research)," Working Papers MRG/0019, Department of Management Science, Lancaster University, revised Jul 2010.
    5. Kraft, Edwin R., 2002. "Scheduling railway freight delivery appointments using a bid price approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 145-165, February.
    6. Marcotte, Patrice & Savard, Gilles & Zhu, Daoli, 2009. "Mathematical structure of a bilevel strategic pricing model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 552-566, March.
    7. Chris Nash & Jan-Eric Nilsson & Heike Link, 2013. "Comparing Three Models for Introduction of Competition into Railways," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 47(2), pages 191-206, May.
    8. Li, Tingting & Xie, Jinxing & Lu, Shengmin & Tang, Jiafu, 2016. "Duopoly game of callable products in airline revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 925-934.
    9. Pazour, Jennifer A. & Meller, Russell D. & Pohl, Letitia M., 2010. "A model to design a national high-speed rail network for freight distribution," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 119-135, March.
    10. Crainic, Teodor G. & Rousseau, Jean-Marc, 1986. "Multicommodity, multimode freight transportation: A general modeling and algorithmic framework for the service network design problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 225-242, June.
    11. Grauberger, Waldemar & Kimms, Alf, 2016. "Revenue management under horizontal and vertical competition within airline alliances," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 228-237.
    12. Florent Laroche & Laurent Guihéry, 2013. "European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS): Supporting competition on the European rail network?," Post-Print halshs-01080562, HAL.
    13. Michael F. Gorman, 2001. "Intermodal Pricing Model Creates a Network Pricing Perspective at BNSF," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 37-49, August.
    14. E. Andrew Boyd, 1994. "Fenchel Cutting Planes for Integer Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 53-64, February.
    15. G Lulli & U Pietropaoli & N Ricciardi, 2011. "Service network design for freight railway transportation: the Italian case," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(12), pages 2107-2119, December.
    16. Kraft, Edwin R. & Srikar, Bellur N. & Phillips, Robert L., 2000. "Revenue Management in Railroad Applications," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 39(1).
    17. G Lulli & U Pietropaoli & N Ricciardi, 2011. "Service network design for freight railway transportation: the Italian case†," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(12), pages 2107-2119, December.
    18. Huang, Kuancheng & Lin, Chia-Yi, 2014. "A simulation analysis for the re-solving issue of the network revenue management problem," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 36-42.
    19. Harker, Patrick T. & Hong, Sungwook, 1994. "Pricing of track time in railroad operations: An internal market approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 197-212, June.
    20. Li Li & Sridhar Tayur, 2005. "Medium-Term Pricing and Operations Planning in Intermodal Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 73-86, February.
    21. Affuso, Luisa, 2003. "Auctions of rail capacity?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 43-46, March.
    22. Barry Alan Pasternack, 1985. "Optimal Pricing and Return Policies for Perishable Commodities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 166-176.
    23. Michael Gorman, 2005. "Estimation of an implied price elasticity of demand through current pricing practices," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 1027-1035.
    24. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel, 2000. "Service network design in freight transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 272-288, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhimei Wang & Avishai Ceder, 2017. "Efficient design of freight train operation with double-hump yards," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(12), pages 1600-1619, December.
    2. Chen, C. & Dollevoet, T.A.B. & Zhao, J., 2017. "One-block train formation in large-scale railway networks: An exact model and a tree-based decomposition algorithm," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI-2017-32, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    3. Wang, Xinchang & Wang, Hua & Zhang, Xiaoning, 2016. "Stochastic seat allocation models for passenger rail transportation under customer choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 95-112.
    4. Chen, Chongshuang & Dollevoet, Twan & Zhao, Jun, 2018. "One-block train formation in large-scale railway networks: An exact model and a tree-based decomposition algorithm," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-30.
    5. Ahmad Baubaid & Natashia Boland & Martin Savelsbergh, 2021. "The Value of Limited Flexibility in Service Network Designs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 52-74, 1-2.
    6. Wang, Zhenjie & Zhang, Dezhi & Tavasszy, Lóránt & Fazi, Stefano, 2023. "Integrated multimodal freight service network design and pricing with a competing service integrator and heterogeneous shipper classes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Christine Tawfik & Sabine Limbourg, 2019. "A Bilevel Model for Network Design and Pricing Based on a Level-of-Service Assessment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 1609-1626, November.
    8. Li, Siqiao & Zhu, Xiaoning & Shang, Pan & Li, Tianqi & Liu, Wenqian, 2023. "Optimizing a shared freight and passenger high-speed railway system: A multi-commodity flow formulation with Benders decomposition solution approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1-31.
    9. Duan, Liwei & Tavasszy, Lorant A. & Rezaei, Jafar, 2019. "Freight service network design with heterogeneous preferences for transport time and reliability," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-12.
    10. Bai, Ruibin & Wallace, Stein W. & Li, Jingpeng & Chong, Alain Yee-Loong, 2014. "Stochastic service network design with rerouting," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 50-65.
    11. Bilegan, Ioana C. & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Wang, Yunfei, 2022. "Scheduled service network design with revenue management considerations and an intermodal barge transportation illustration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 164-177.
    12. Christine Tawfik & Sabine Limbourg, 2018. "Pricing Problems in Intermodal Freight Transport: Research Overview and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Wang, Hua & Wang, Xinchang & Zhang, Xiaoning, 2017. "Dynamic resource allocation for intermodal freight transportation with network effects: Approximations and algorithms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 83-112.
    14. Meng, Lingyun & Zhou, Xuesong, 2019. "An integrated train service plan optimization model with variable demand: A team-based scheduling approach with dual cost information in a layered network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1-28.
    15. Paraskevopoulos, Dimitris C. & Gürel, Sinan & Bektaş, Tolga, 2016. "The congested multicommodity network design problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 166-187.
    16. Meng, Qiang & Hei, Xiuling & Wang, Shuaian & Mao, Haijun, 2015. "Carrying capacity procurement of rail and shipping services for automobile delivery with uncertain demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 38-54.
    17. Michael F. Gorman, 2023. "Case Article—Louisiana Branch Lines," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 139-143, May.
    18. Xin Wang & Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Stein W. Wallace, 2019. "Stochastic Network Design for Planning Scheduled Transportation Services: The Value of Deterministic Solutions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 153-170, February.
    19. Haque, Md Tabish & Hamid, Faiz, 2022. "An optimization model to assign seats in long distance trains to minimize SARS-CoV-2 diffusion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 104-120.
    20. Zhou, Wei-Hua & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2009. "Pricing and competition in a transportation market with empty equipment repositioning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 677-691, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:312:y:2024:i:1:p:240-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.