IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v278y2019i2p563-577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discrete and continuous-time formulations for dealing with break periods: Preemptive and non-preemptive scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Castro, Pedro M.
  • Harjunkoski, Iiro
  • Grossmann, Ignacio E.

Abstract

This paper presents new mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) approaches for handling preemption both in discrete and continuous-time scheduling formulations. Preemption refers to the capability of interrupting the execution of a task when encountering a pre-defined break period, assuming that the task continues immediately after the end of such time window. We rely on Generalized Disjunctive Programming to derive the constraints for the continuous-time formulations and on a compact convex hull reformulation to make them computationally efficient. We investigate both the general precedence and multiple time grids representation concepts. Generalization of the discrete-time formulation is simpler, involving a change in the model parameters. Validation and comparison of the mathematical formulations is done through the solution of sixteen benchmark problems, involving instances with one to four sets of breaks. The results show that the general precedence formulation is computationally more effective for flexible flowshops, being outperformed by the discrete-time approach when considering common rather than machine-dependent breaks. For single stage plants with parallel units, the continuous multiple time grid formulation prevails.

Suggested Citation

  • Castro, Pedro M. & Harjunkoski, Iiro & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2019. "Discrete and continuous-time formulations for dealing with break periods: Preemptive and non-preemptive scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 563-577.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:278:y:2019:i:2:p:563-577
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.04.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221719303595
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.04.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kress, Dominik & Dornseifer, Jan & Jaehn, Florian, 2019. "An exact solution approach for scheduling cooperative gantry cranes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 82-101.
    2. Edmund Burke & Michael Pinedo, 2019. "Journal of scheduling (2019)," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-2, February.
    3. Velez, Sara & Dong, Yachao & Maravelias, Christos T., 2017. "Changeover formulations for discrete-time mixed-integer programming scheduling models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 949-963.
    4. Christodoulos Floudas & Xiaoxia Lin, 2005. "Mixed Integer Linear Programming in Process Scheduling: Modeling, Algorithms, and Applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 131-162, October.
    5. Shioura, Akiyoshi & Shakhlevich, Natalia V. & Strusevich, Vitaly A., 2018. "Preemptive models of scheduling with controllable processing times and of scheduling with imprecise computation: A review of solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 795-818.
    6. Mosheiov, Gur & Sarig, Assaf & Strusevich, Vitaly A & Mosheiff, Jonathan, 2018. "Two-machine flow shop and open shop scheduling problems with a single maintenance window," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 388-400.
    7. Peteghem, Vincent Van & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2010. "A genetic algorithm for the preemptive and non-preemptive multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 409-418, March.
    8. Lee, Kangbok & Zheng, Feifeng & Pinedo, Michael L., 2019. "Online scheduling of ordered flow shops," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 50-60.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu, Haimin & Pei, Zhi, 2023. "Single machine scheduling with release dates: A distributionally robust approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 19-37.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Ran & Guo, Sainan, 2021. "Applying “Peeling Onion” approach for competitive analysis in online scheduling with rejection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 57-67.
    2. Myoung-Ju Park & Byung-Cheon Choi & Yunhong Min & Kyung Min Kim, 2020. "Two-Machine Ordered Flow Shop Scheduling with Generalized Due Dates," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 37(01), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Bowen Pang & Xiaolei Xie & Feng Ju & James Pipe, 2022. "A dynamic sequential decision-making model on MRI real-time scheduling with simulation-based optimization," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 426-440, September.
    4. Jiang, Yiwei & Wu, Mengjing & Chen, Xin & Dong, Jianming & Cheng, T.C.E. & Blazewicz, Jacek & Ji, Min, 2024. "Online early work scheduling on parallel machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 855-862.
    5. Luis F. Machado-Domínguez & Carlos D. Paternina-Arboleda & Jorge I. Vélez & Agustin Barrios-Sarmiento, 2021. "A memetic algorithm to address the multi-node resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 413-429, August.
    6. Farahmand, H. & Doorman, G.L., 2012. "Balancing market integration in the Northern European continent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 316-326.
    7. Moo-Sung Sohn & Jiwoong Choi & Hoseog Kang & In-Chan Choi, 2017. "Multiobjective Production Planning at LG Display," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 279-291, August.
    8. Lennart Zey & Dirk Briskorn & Nils Boysen, 2022. "Twin-crane scheduling during seaside workload peaks with a dedicated handshake area," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 3-34, February.
    9. Martijn H. H. Schoot Uiterkamp & Marco E. T. Gerards & Johann L. Hurink, 2022. "On a Reduction for a Class of Resource Allocation Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1387-1402, May.
    10. Lingfa Lu & Liqi Zhang & Jinwen Ou, 2021. "In-house production and outsourcing under different discount schemes on the total outsourcing cost," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 361-374, March.
    11. Lin, Ran & Wang, Jun-Qiang & Liu, Zhixin & Xu, Jun, 2023. "Best possible algorithms for online scheduling on identical batch machines with periodic pulse interruptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 53-64.
    12. Lin, Ran & Wang, Jun-Qiang & Oulamara, Ammar, 2023. "Online scheduling on parallel-batch machines with periodic availability constraints and job delivery," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    13. Grzegorz Bocewicz & Zbigniew Banaszak & Izabela Nielsen, 2019. "Multimodal processes prototyping subject to grid-like network and fuzzy operation time constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 561-585, February.
    14. Behrad Barghi & Shahram Shadrokh Sikari, 2022. "Meta-heuristic Solution with Considering Setup Time for Multi-Skilled Project Scheduling Problem," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Nadia Chaudry & Ingunn Vermedal & Kjetil Fagerholt & Maria Fleischer Fauske & Magnus Stålhane, 2020. "A decomposition solution approach to the troops-to-tasks assignment in military peacekeeping operations," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 17(4), pages 357-371, October.
    16. Alix Vargas & Carmen Fuster & David Corne, 2020. "Towards Sustainable Collaborative Logistics Using Specialist Planning Algorithms and a Gain-Sharing Business Model: A UK Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-29, August.
    17. Akiyoshi Shioura & Natalia V. Shakhlevich & Vitaly A. Strusevich, 2020. "Scheduling problems with controllable processing times and a common deadline to minimize maximum compression cost," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 76(3), pages 471-490, March.
    18. Ben Issa, Samer & Patterson, Raymond A. & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Solving resource-constrained multi-project environment under different activity assumptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    19. Zhang, Haowei & Xie, Junwei & Ge, Jiaang & Zhang, Zhaojian & Zong, Binfeng, 2019. "A hybrid adaptively genetic algorithm for task scheduling problem in the phased array radar," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 868-878.
    20. Gian Paramo & Arturo Bretas, 2023. "Proactive Frequency Stability Scheme: A Distributed Framework Based on Particle Filters and Synchrophasors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:278:y:2019:i:2:p:563-577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.