IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v265y2018i2p703-709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing block-based maintenance under random machine usage

Author

Listed:
  • de Jonge, Bram
  • Jakobsons, Edgars

Abstract

Existing studies on maintenance optimization generally assume that machines are either used continuously, or that times until failure do not depend on the actual usage. In practice, however, these assumptions are often not realistic. In this paper, we consider block-based maintenance optimization for a machine that is not used continuously and for which the usage is random. We propose to govern the random machine usage by a Markov switching (on–off), and present a method to determine the optimal maintenance interval. Various problem instances are considered, and the optimal maintenance intervals are compared with two benchmark intervals that result from the limiting cases with a very high and a very low switching frequency. Based on this analysis, we identify under what circumstances it is particularly important to take the properties of the usage pattern into account when scheduling maintenance.

Suggested Citation

  • de Jonge, Bram & Jakobsons, Edgars, 2018. "Optimizing block-based maintenance under random machine usage," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 703-709.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:265:y:2018:i:2:p:703-709
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717306781
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zitrou, A. & Bedford, T. & Daneshkhah, A., 2013. "Robustness of maintenance decisions: Uncertainty modelling and value of information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 60-71.
    2. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    3. Saassouh, B. & Dieulle, L. & Grall, A., 2007. "Online maintenance policy for a deteriorating system with random change of mode," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(12), pages 1677-1685.
    4. Richard Barlow & Larry Hunter, 1960. "Optimum Preventive Maintenance Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 90-100, February.
    5. Anahita Khojandi & Lisa Maillart & Oleg Prokopyev, 2014. "Optimal planning of life-depleting maintenance activities," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(7), pages 636-652.
    6. de Jonge, Bram & Klingenberg, Warse & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2015. "Optimum maintenance strategy under uncertainty in the lifetime distribution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 59-67.
    7. Coria, V.H. & Maximov, S. & Rivas-Dávalos, F. & Melchor, C.L. & Guardado, J.L., 2015. "Analytical method for optimization of maintenance policy based on available system failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 55-63.
    8. Tinga, Tiedo, 2010. "Application of physical failure models to enable usage and load based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(10), pages 1061-1075.
    9. Alebrant Mendes, Angélica & Duarte Ribeiro, José Luis, 2014. "Establishment of a maintenance plan based on quantitative analysis in the context of RCM in a JIT production scenario," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 21-29.
    10. Borrero, J.S. & Akhavan-Tabatabaei, R., 2013. "Time and inventory dependent optimal maintenance policies for single machine workstations: An MDP approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 545-555.
    11. Alsyouf, Imad, 2007. "The role of maintenance in improving companies' productivity and profitability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 70-78, January.
    12. de Jonge, Bram & Dijkstra, Arjan S. & Romeijnders, Ward, 2015. "Cost benefits of postponing time-based maintenance under lifetime distribution uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 15-21.
    13. Zhao, Xufeng & Mizutani, Satoshi & Nakagawa, Toshio, 2015. "Which is better for replacement policies with continuous or discrete scheduled times?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 477-486.
    14. Jack, N. & Iskandar, B.P. & Murthy, D.N.P., 2009. "A repair–replace strategy based on usage rate for items sold with a two-dimensional warranty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 611-617.
    15. Godoy, David R. & Pascual, Rodrigo & Knights, Peter, 2014. "A decision-making framework to integrate maintenance contract conditions with critical spares management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 102-108.
    16. D. N. P. Murthy & B. P. Iskandar & R. J. Wilson, 1995. "Two-Dimensional Failure-Free Warranty Policies: Two-Dimensional Point Process Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 356-366, April.
    17. Xia, Tangbin & Jin, Xiaoning & Xi, Lifeng & Ni, Jun, 2015. "Production-driven opportunistic maintenance for batch production based on MAM–APB scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 781-790.
    18. Weigang Xu & Le Cao, 2015. "Optimal tool replacement with product quality deterioration and random tool failure," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(6), pages 1736-1745, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peng, Shizhe & Jiang, Wei & Huang, Wenpo & Luo, Qinglin, 2024. "The impact of gamma usage processes on preventive maintenance policies under two-dimensional warranty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    2. Michiel A. J. uit het Broek & Ruud H. Teunter & Bram de Jonge & Jasper Veldman & Nicky D. Van Foreest, 2020. "Condition-Based Production Planning: Adjusting Production Rates to Balance Output and Failure Risk," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 792-811, July.
    3. Özgür-Ünlüakın, Demet & Türkali, Busenur, 2021. "Evaluation of proactive maintenance policies on a stochastically dependent hidden multi-component system using DBNs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Havinga, Maik J.A. & de Jonge, Bram, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance in the cyclic patrolling repairman problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    2. Briš, Radim & Byczanski, Petr & Goňo, Radomír & Rusek, Stanislav, 2017. "Discrete maintenance optimization of complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 80-89.
    3. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    4. de Jonge, Bram & Dijkstra, Arjan S. & Romeijnders, Ward, 2015. "Cost benefits of postponing time-based maintenance under lifetime distribution uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 15-21.
    5. Fouladirad, Mitra & Paroissin, Christian & Grall, Antoine, 2018. "Sensitivity of optimal replacement policies to lifetime parameter estimates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 963-975.
    6. Hu, Jiawen & Jiang, Zuhua & Liao, Haitao, 2017. "Preventive maintenance of a single machine system working under piecewise constant operating condition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 105-115.
    7. Huang, Yeu-Shiang & Gau, Wei-Yo & Ho, Jyh-Wen, 2015. "Cost analysis of two-dimensional warranty for products with periodic preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 51-58.
    8. Truong Ba, H. & Cholette, M.E. & Borghesani, P. & Zhou, Y. & Ma, L., 2017. "Opportunistic maintenance considering non-homogenous opportunity arrivals and stochastic opportunity durations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 151-161.
    9. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Teunter, Ruud H. & Veldman, Jasper, 2017. "Joint condition-based maintenance and inventory optimization for systems with multiple components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 209-222.
    10. Jiawen Hu & Zuhua Jiang & Haitao Liao, 2017. "Preventive maintenance of a batch production system under time-varying operational condition," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(19), pages 5681-5705, October.
    11. Wang, Yukun & Liu, Yiliu & Liu, Zixian & Li, Xiaopeng, 2017. "On reliability improvement program for second-hand products sold with a two-dimensional warranty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 452-463.
    12. Dursun, İpek & Akçay, Alp & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2022. "Age-based maintenance under population heterogeneity: Optimal exploration and exploitation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 1007-1020.
    13. Zhao, Xian & He, Zongda & Wu, Yaguang & Qiu, Qingan, 2022. "Joint optimization of condition-based performance control and maintenance policies for mission-critical systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    14. Lin Wang & Zhiqiang Lu & Yifei Ren, 2019. "A rolling horizon approach for production planning and condition-based maintenance under uncertain demand," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1014-1028, December.
    15. Wang, Xiaolin & Li, Lishuai & Xie, Min, 2020. "An unpunctual preventive maintenance policy under two-dimensional warranty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 304-318.
    16. Jiawen Hu & Zuhua Jiang & Hong Wang, 2016. "Preventive maintenance for a single-machine system under variable operational conditions," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(4), pages 391-404, August.
    17. Jiang, R. & Murthy, D.N.P., 2011. "A study of Weibull shape parameter: Properties and significance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1619-1626.
    18. Poppe, Joeri & Basten, Rob J.I. & Boute, Robert N. & Lambrecht, Marc R., 2017. "Numerical study of inventory management under various maintenance policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 262-273.
    19. Sidibe, I.B. & Khatab, A. & Diallo, C. & Kassambara, A., 2017. "Preventive maintenance optimization for a stochastically degrading system with a random initial age," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 255-263.
    20. Scarf, P.A. & Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Lopes, R.S., 2019. "Delay-time modelling of a critical system subject to random inspections," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 772-782.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:265:y:2018:i:2:p:703-709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.