IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v22y2020i4p792-811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Condition-Based Production Planning: Adjusting Production Rates to Balance Output and Failure Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Michiel A. J. uit het Broek

    (Department of Operations, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, Netherlands)

  • Ruud H. Teunter

    (Department of Operations, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, Netherlands)

  • Bram de Jonge

    (Department of Operations, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, Netherlands)

  • Jasper Veldman

    (Department of Operations, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, Netherlands)

  • Nicky D. Van Foreest

    (Department of Operations, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, Netherlands)

Abstract

Problem Definition : Many production systems deteriorate over time as a result of load and stress caused by production. The deterioration rate of these systems typically depends on the production rate, implying that the equipment’s deterioration rate can be controlled by adjusting the production rate. We introduce the use of condition monitoring to dynamically adjust the production rate to minimize maintenance costs and maximize production revenues. We study a single-unit system for which the next maintenance action is scheduled upfront. Academic/Practical Relevance : Condition-based maintenance decisions are frequently seen in the literature. However, in many real-life systems, maintenance planning has limited flexibility and cannot be done last minute. As an alternative, we are the first to propose using condition information to optimize the production rate, which is a more flexible short-term decision. Methodology : We derive structural optimality results from the analysis of deterministic deterioration processes. A Markov decision process formulation of the problem is used to obtain numerical results for stochastic deterioration processes. Results : The structure of the optimal policy strongly depends on the (convex or concave) relation between the production rate and the corresponding deterioration rate. Condition-based production rate decisions result in significant cost savings (by up to 50%), achieved by better balancing the failure risk and production output. For several systems a win-win scenario is observed, with both reduced failure risk and increased expected total production. Furthermore, condition-based production rates increase robustness and lead to more stable profits and production output. Managerial Implications : Using condition information to dynamically adjust production rates provides opportunities to improve the operational performance of systems with production-dependent deterioration.

Suggested Citation

  • Michiel A. J. uit het Broek & Ruud H. Teunter & Bram de Jonge & Jasper Veldman & Nicky D. Van Foreest, 2020. "Condition-Based Production Planning: Adjusting Production Rates to Balance Output and Failure Risk," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 792-811, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:22:y:2020:i:4:p:792-811
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2019.0773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0773
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2019.0773?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Makis & X. Jiang, 2003. "Optimal Replacement Under Partial Observations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 382-394, May.
    2. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    3. Samuelson, Aviva & Haigh, Andrew & O'Reilly, Małgorzata M. & Bean, Nigel G., 2017. "Stochastic model for maintenance in continuously deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1169-1179.
    4. S. P. Sethi & H. Yan & H. Zhang & Q. Zhang, 2002. "Optimal and Hierarchical Controls in Dynamic Stochastic Manufacturing Systems: A Survey," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 133-170.
    5. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Teunter, Ruud H. & Veldman, Jasper, 2017. "Joint condition-based maintenance and inventory optimization for systems with multiple components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 209-222.
    6. Peng, Hao & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2016. "Joint optimization of condition-based maintenance and production lot-sizing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 94-107.
    7. Liu, Bin & Wu, Shaomin & Xie, Min & Kuo, Way, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance policy for degrading systems with age- and state-dependent operating cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 879-887.
    8. Michael Jong Kim & Viliam Makis, 2013. "Joint Optimization of Sampling and Control of Partially Observable Failing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 777-790, June.
    9. Wenjing Shen & Izak Duenyas & Roman Kapuscinski, 2014. "Optimal Pricing, Production, and Inventory for New Product Diffusion Under Supply Constraints," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 28-45, February.
    10. Mula, J. & Poler, R. & Garcia-Sabater, J.P. & Lario, F.C., 2006. "Models for production planning under uncertainty: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 271-285, September.
    11. de Jonge, Bram & Jakobsons, Edgars, 2018. "Optimizing block-based maintenance under random machine usage," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 703-709.
    12. Seyed M. R. Iravani & Vijayalakshmi Krishnamurthy, 2007. "Workforce Agility in Repair and Maintenance Environments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 168-184, January.
    13. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    14. T W Sloan, 2004. "A periodic review production and maintenance model with random demand, deteriorating equipment, and binomial yield," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(6), pages 647-656, June.
    15. Nourelfath, Mustapha & Yalaoui, Farouk, 2012. "Integrated load distribution and production planning in series-parallel multi-state systems with failure rate depending on load," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 138-145.
    16. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    17. Xiao Liu & Jingrui Li & Khalifa Al-Khalifa & Abdelmagid Hamouda & David Coit & Elsayed Elsayed, 2013. "Condition-based maintenance for continuously monitored degrading systems with multiple failure modes," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 422-435.
    18. Zhang, Xiaohong & Zeng, Jianchao, 2017. "Joint optimization of condition-based opportunistic maintenance and spare parts provisioning policy in multiunit systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 479-498.
    19. Vincent W. Slaugh & Bahar Biller & Sridhar R. Tayur, 2016. "Managing Rentals with Usage-Based Loss," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 429-444, July.
    20. Kazaz, Burak & Sloan, Thomas W., 2013. "The impact of process deterioration on production and maintenance policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 88-100.
    21. Akram Khaleghei & Viliam Makis, 2016. "Reliability estimation of a system subject to condition monitoring with two dependent failure modes," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(11), pages 1058-1071, November.
    22. Annie Francie, Kouedeu & Jean-Pierre, Kenne & Pierre, Dejax & Victor, Songmene & Vladimir, Polotski, 2014. "Stochastic optimal control of manufacturing systems under production-dependent failure rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 174-187.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Uit Het Broek, Michiel A.J. & Teunter, Ruud H. & de Jonge, Bram & Veldman, Jasper, 2021. "Joint condition-based maintenance and load-sharing optimization for two-unit systems with economic dependency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1119-1131.
    2. Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Lopes, Rodrigo S. & Scarf, Philip A., 2021. "Inspection and replacement policy with a fixed periodic schedule," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    3. Zhao, Xian & He, Zongda & Wu, Yaguang & Qiu, Qingan, 2022. "Joint optimization of condition-based performance control and maintenance policies for mission-critical systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    4. Jun Wang & Yuyang Wang & Yuqiang Fu, 2023. "Joint Optimization of Condition-Based Maintenance and Performance Control for Linear Multi-State Consecutively Connected Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Zhao, Xian & Li, Rong & Cao, Shuai & Qiu, Qingan, 2023. "Joint modeling of loading and mission abort policies for systems operating in dynamic environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    6. Sergey S. Ketkov & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Lisa M. Maillart, 2023. "Planning of life-depleting preventive maintenance activities with replacements," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1461-1483, May.
    7. Zhang, Nan & Cai, Kaiquan & Deng, Yingjun & Zhang, Jun, 2023. "Determining the optimal production–maintenance policy of a parallel production system with stochastically interacted yield and deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    8. Jiang, Junwei & An, Youjun & Dong, Yuanfa & Hu, Jiawen & Li, Yinghe & Zhao, Ziye, 2023. "Integrated optimization of non-permutation flow shop scheduling and maintenance planning with variable processing speed," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    9. Leoni, Leonardo & De Carlo, Filippo & Tucci, Mario, 2023. "Developing a framework for generating production-dependent failure rate through discrete-event simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    10. uit het Broek, Michiel A.J. & Teunter, Ruud H. & de Jonge, Bram & Veldman, Jasper, 2021. "Joint condition-based maintenance and condition-based production optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    11. Zhao, Xiujie & Liu, Bin & Xu, Jianyu & Wang, Xiao-Lin, 2023. "Imperfect maintenance policies for warranted products under stochastic performance degradation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 150-165.
    12. An, Youjun & Chen, Xiaohui & Hu, Jiawen & Zhang, Lin & Li, Yinghe & Jiang, Junwei, 2022. "Joint optimization of preventive maintenance and production rescheduling with new machine insertion and processing speed selection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    13. Dilaver, Halit Metehan & Akçay, Alp & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2023. "Integrated planning of asset-use and dry-docking for a fleet of maritime assets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    2. Liu, Xingchen & Sun, Qiuzhuang & Ye, Zhi-Sheng & Yildirim, Murat, 2021. "Optimal multi-type inspection policy for systems with imperfect online monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    3. uit het Broek, Michiel A.J. & Teunter, Ruud H. & de Jonge, Bram & Veldman, Jasper, 2021. "Joint condition-based maintenance and condition-based production optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    4. de Jonge, Bram, 2019. "Discretizing continuous-time continuous-state deterioration processes, with an application to condition-based maintenance optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 1-5.
    5. Ekin, Tahir, 2018. "Integrated maintenance and production planning with endogenous uncertain yield," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 52-61.
    6. Uit Het Broek, Michiel A.J. & Teunter, Ruud H. & de Jonge, Bram & Veldman, Jasper, 2021. "Joint condition-based maintenance and load-sharing optimization for two-unit systems with economic dependency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1119-1131.
    7. Zheng, Meimei & Lin, Jie & Xia, Tangbin & Liu, Yu & Pan, Ershun, 2023. "Joint condition-based maintenance and spare provisioning policy for a K-out-of-N system with failures during inspection intervals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1220-1232.
    8. Wang, Jun & Zhu, Xiaoyan, 2021. "Joint optimization of condition-based maintenance and inventory control for a k-out-of-n:F system of multi-state degrading components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 514-529.
    9. Cai, Yue & Teunter, Ruud H. & de Jonge, Bram, 2023. "A data-driven approach for condition-based maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 730-738.
    10. Zheng, Meimei & Ye, Hongqing & Wang, Dong & Pan, Ershun, 2021. "Joint Optimization of Condition-Based Maintenance and Spare Parts Orders for Multi-Unit Systems with Dual Sourcing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    11. Azizi, Fariba & Salari, Nooshin, 2023. "A novel condition-based maintenance framework for parallel manufacturing systems based on bivariate birth/birth–death processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    12. Zhao, Xian & He, Zongda & Wu, Yaguang & Qiu, Qingan, 2022. "Joint optimization of condition-based performance control and maintenance policies for mission-critical systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    13. Liu, Xinbao & Yang, Tianji & Pei, Jun & Liao, Haitao & Pohl, Edward A., 2019. "Replacement and inventory control for a multi-customer product service system with decreasing replacement costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 561-574.
    14. Havinga, Maik J.A. & de Jonge, Bram, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance in the cyclic patrolling repairman problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    15. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    16. Kampitsis, Dimitris & Panagiotidou, Sofia, 2022. "A Bayesian condition-based maintenance and monitoring policy with variable sampling intervals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    17. Huynh, K.T., 2021. "An adaptive predictive maintenance model for repairable deteriorating systems using inverse Gaussian degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    18. Peng, Hao & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2016. "Joint optimization of condition-based maintenance and production lot-sizing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 94-107.
    19. Yan, Tao & Lei, Yaguo & Wang, Biao & Han, Tianyu & Si, Xiaosheng & Li, Naipeng, 2020. "Joint maintenance and spare parts inventory optimization for multi-unit systems considering imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    20. Esposito, Nicola & Mele, Agostino & Castanier, Bruno & GIORGIO, Massimiliano, 2023. "A hybrid maintenance policy for a deteriorating unit in the presence of three forms of variability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:22:y:2020:i:4:p:792-811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.