IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v120y2013icp60-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robustness of maintenance decisions: Uncertainty modelling and value of information

Author

Listed:
  • Zitrou, A.
  • Bedford, T.
  • Daneshkhah, A.

Abstract

In this paper we show how sensitivity analysis for a maintenance optimisation problem can be undertaken by using the concept of expected value of perfect information (EVPI). This concept is important in a decision-theoretic context such as the maintenance problem, as it allows us to explore the effect of parameter uncertainty on the cost and the resulting recommendations. To reduce the computational effort required for the calculation of EVPIs, we have used Gaussian process (GP) emulators to approximate the cost rate model. Results from the analysis allow us to identify the most important parameters in terms of the benefit of ’learning’ by focussing on the partial expected value of perfect information for a parameter. The analysis determines the optimal solution and the expected related cost when the parameters are unknown and partially known. This type of analysis can be used to ensure that both maintenance calculations and resulting recommendations are sufficiently robust.

Suggested Citation

  • Zitrou, A. & Bedford, T. & Daneshkhah, A., 2013. "Robustness of maintenance decisions: Uncertainty modelling and value of information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 60-71.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:120:y:2013:i:c:p:60-71
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832013000628
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeremy E. Oakley & Anthony O'Hagan, 2004. "Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(3), pages 751-769, August.
    2. Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2009. "Kriging metamodeling in simulation: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 707-716, February.
    3. R Dekker & R P Plasmeijer, 2001. "Multi-parameter maintenance optimisation via the marginal cost approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(2), pages 188-197, February.
    4. Pham, Hoang & Wang, Hongzhou, 1996. "Imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 425-438, November.
    5. Daneshkhah, Alireza & Bedford, Tim, 2013. "Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of system availability using Gaussian processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 82-93.
    6. Marc C. Kennedy & Anthony O'Hagan, 2001. "Bayesian calibration of computer models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(3), pages 425-464.
    7. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    8. James C. Felli & Gordon B. Hazen, 1998. "Sensitivity Analysis and the Expected Value of Perfect Information," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 18(1), pages 95-109, January.
    9. Tong, Charles, 2010. "Self-validated variance-based methods for sensitivity analysis of model outputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 301-309.
    10. Toshio Nakagawa, 2008. "Advanced Reliability Models and Maintenance Policies," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84800-294-4, March.
    11. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-178.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Song, Chaolin & Zhang, Chi & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah & Xiao, Rucheng, 2022. "Value of information analysis in non-stationary stochastic decision environments: A reliability-assisted POMDP approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Zou, Guang & Kolios, Athanasios, 2022. "Quantifying the value of negative inspection outcomes in fatigue maintenance planning: Cost reduction, risk mitigation and reliability growth," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. de Jonge, Bram & Jakobsons, Edgars, 2018. "Optimizing block-based maintenance under random machine usage," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 703-709.
    4. Scheu, Matti Niclas & Kolios, Athanasios & Fischer, Tim & Brennan, Feargal, 2017. "Influence of statistical uncertainty of component reliability estimations on offshore wind farm availability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 28-39.
    5. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    6. Zou, Guang & Faber, Michael Havbro & González, Arturo & Banisoleiman, Kian, 2021. "Computing the value of information from periodic testing in holistic decision making under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    7. Jafar-Zanjani, Hamed & Zandieh, Mostafa & Sharifi, Mani, 2022. "Robust and resilient joint periodic maintenance planning and scheduling in a multi-factory network under uncertainty: A case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Daneshkhah, A. & Stocks, N.G. & Jeffrey, P., 2017. "Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of optimised preventive maintenance strategies for deteriorating infrastructure assets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 33-45.
    9. Kapoor, Medha & Christensen, Christian Overgaard & Schmidt, Jacob Wittrup & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard & Thöns, Sebastian, 2023. "Decision analytic approach for the reclassification of concrete bridges by using elastic limit information from proof loading," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    10. Bjørnsen, Kjartan & Selvik, Jon Tømmerås & Aven, Terje, 2019. "A semi-quantitative assessment process for improved use of the expected value of information measure in safety management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 494-502.
    11. Lin, Chaochao & Song, Junho & Pozzi, Matteo, 2022. "Optimal inspection of binary systems via Value of Information analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    12. López-Santana, Eduyn & Akhavan-Tabatabaei, Raha & Dieulle, Laurence & Labadie, Nacima & Medaglia, Andrés L., 2016. "On the combined maintenance and routing optimization problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 199-214.
    13. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    14. Briš, Radim & Byczanski, Petr & Goňo, Radomír & Rusek, Stanislav, 2017. "Discrete maintenance optimization of complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 80-89.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daneshkhah, A. & Stocks, N.G. & Jeffrey, P., 2017. "Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of optimised preventive maintenance strategies for deteriorating infrastructure assets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 33-45.
    2. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    3. Chaabane, K. & Khatab, A. & Diallo, C. & Aghezzaf, E.-H. & Venkatadri, U., 2020. "Integrated imperfect multimission selective maintenance and repairpersons assignment problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Shafiee, Mahmood & Chukova, Stefanka, 2013. "Maintenance models in warranty: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 561-572.
    5. Seyedhosseini, Seyed Mohammad & Moakedi, Hamid & Shahanaghi, Kamran, 2018. "Imperfect inspection optimization for a two-component system subject to hidden and two-stage revealed failures over a finite time horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 141-156.
    6. Taghipour, Sharareh & Banjevic, Dragan, 2012. "Optimal inspection of a complex system subject to periodic and opportunistic inspections and preventive replacements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 649-660.
    7. Taghipour, Sharareh & Banjevic, Dragan & Jardine, Andrew K.S., 2010. "Periodic inspection optimization model for a complex repairable system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 944-952.
    8. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    9. Hashemi, M. & Asadi, M. & Zarezadeh, S., 2020. "Optimal maintenance policies for coherent systems with multi-type components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    10. Xiang, Yisha, 2013. "Joint optimization of X¯ control chart and preventive maintenance policies: A discrete-time Markov chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 382-390.
    11. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    12. Coria, V.H. & Maximov, S. & Rivas-Dávalos, F. & Melchor, C.L. & Guardado, J.L., 2015. "Analytical method for optimization of maintenance policy based on available system failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 55-63.
    13. Jakub Bijak & Jason D. Hilton & Eric Silverman & Viet Dung Cao, 2013. "Reforging the Wedding Ring," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 29(27), pages 729-766.
    14. Seyed Habib A. Rahmati & Abbas Ahmadi & Kannan Govindan, 2018. "A novel integrated condition-based maintenance and stochastic flexible job shop scheduling problem: simulation-based optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 583-621, October.
    15. Zitrou, Athena & Bedford, Tim & Walls, Lesley, 2016. "A model for availability growth with application to new generation offshore wind farms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 83-94.
    16. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    17. Petropoulos, G. & Wooster, M.J. & Carlson, T.N. & Kennedy, M.C. & Scholze, M., 2009. "A global Bayesian sensitivity analysis of the 1d SimSphere soil–vegetation–atmospheric transfer (SVAT) model using Gaussian model emulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2427-2440.
    18. Tianyang Wang & James S. Dyer & Warren J. Hahn, 2017. "Sensitivity analysis of decision making under dependent uncertainties using copulas," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 117-139, November.
    19. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.
    20. Al Ali, Hannah & Daneshkhah, Alireza & Boutayeb, Abdesslam & Malunguza, Noble Jahalamajaha & Mukandavire, Zindoga, 2022. "Exploring dynamical properties of a Type 1 diabetes model using sensitivity approaches," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 324-342.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:120:y:2013:i:c:p:60-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.