IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v215y2011i3p532-538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural gas bilevel cash-out problem: Convergence of a penalty function method

Author

Listed:
  • Dempe, Stephan
  • Kalashnikov, Vyacheslav V.
  • Pérez-Valdés, Gerardo A.
  • Kalashnykova, Nataliya I.

Abstract

This paper studies a special bi-level programming problem that arises from the dealings of a Natural Gas Shipping Company and the Pipeline Operator, with facilities of the latter used by the former. Because of the business relationships between these two actors, the timing and objectives of their decision-making process are different and sometimes even opposed. In order to model that, bi-level programming was traditionally used in previous works. Later, the problem was expanded and theoretically studied to facilitate its solution; this included extension of the upper level objective function, linear reformulation, heuristic approaches, and branch-and-bound techniques. In this paper, we present a linear programming reformulation of the latest version of the model, which is significantly faster to solve when implemented computationally. More importantly, this new formulation makes it easier to analyze the problem theoretically, allowing us to draw some conclusions about the nature of the solution of the modified problem. Numerical results concerning the running time, convergence, and optimal values, are presented and compared to previous reports, showing a significant improvement in speed without actual sacrifice of the solution's quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Dempe, Stephan & Kalashnikov, Vyacheslav V. & Pérez-Valdés, Gerardo A. & Kalashnykova, Nataliya I., 2011. "Natural gas bilevel cash-out problem: Convergence of a penalty function method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 532-538, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:215:y:2011:i:3:p:532-538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221711006059
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juris, Andrej, 1998. "The emergence of markets in the natural gas industry," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1895, The World Bank.
    2. Kalashnikov, Vyacheslav V. & Pérez-Valdés, Gerardo A. & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Kalashnykova, Nataliya I., 2010. "Natural gas cash-out problem: Bilevel stochastic optimization approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 18-33, October.
    3. Benoît Colson & Patrice Marcotte & Gilles Savard, 2007. "An overview of bilevel optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 235-256, September.
    4. Dempe, Stephan & Kalashnikov, Vyacheslav & Rios-Mercado, Roger Z., 2005. "Discrete bilevel programming: Application to a natural gas cash-out problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(2), pages 469-488, October.
    5. Liu, Yi-Hsin & Spencer, Thomas H., 1995. "Solving a bilevel linear program when the inner decision maker controls few variables," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 644-651, March.
    6. Vyacheslav Kalashnikov & Gerardo Pérez & Nataliya Kalashnykova, 2010. "A linearization approach to solve the natural gas cash-out bilevel problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 423-442, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leonardo Lozano & J. Cole Smith, 2017. "A Value-Function-Based Exact Approach for the Bilevel Mixed-Integer Programming Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 768-786, June.
    2. Liu, Shaonan & Wang, Mingzheng & Kong, Nan & Hu, Xiangpei, 2021. "An enhanced branch-and-bound algorithm for bilevel integer linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 661-679.
    3. Escudero, Laureano F. & Monge, Juan F. & Rodríguez-Chía, Antonio M., 2020. "On pricing-based equilibrium for network expansion planning. A multi-period bilevel approach under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 262-279.
    4. Kovacevic, Raimund M. & Pflug, Georg Ch., 2014. "Electricity swing option pricing by stochastic bilevel optimization: A survey and new approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 389-403.
    5. Falk M. Hante & Martin Schmidt, 2019. "Complementarity-based nonlinear programming techniques for optimal mixing in gas networks," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(3), pages 299-323, September.
    6. Liu, Shaonan & Kong, Nan & Parikh, Pratik & Wang, Mingzheng, 2023. "Optimal trauma care network redesign with government subsidy: A bilevel integer programming approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vyacheslav Kalashnikov & Gerardo Pérez & Nataliya Kalashnykova, 2010. "A linearization approach to solve the natural gas cash-out bilevel problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 423-442, December.
    2. Behdad Beheshti & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Eduardo L. Pasiliao, 2016. "Exact solution approaches for bilevel assignment problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 215-242, May.
    3. Liu, Shaonan & Wang, Mingzheng & Kong, Nan & Hu, Xiangpei, 2021. "An enhanced branch-and-bound algorithm for bilevel integer linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 661-679.
    4. Leonardo Lozano & J. Cole Smith, 2017. "A Value-Function-Based Exact Approach for the Bilevel Mixed-Integer Programming Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 768-786, June.
    5. Andreas Lanz & Gregor Reich & Ole Wilms, 2022. "Adaptive grids for the estimation of dynamic models," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 179-238, June.
    6. Shi, Yi & Deng, Yawen & Wang, Guoan & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. Lucio Bianco & Massimiliano Caramia & Stefano Giordani & Veronica Piccialli, 2016. "A Game-Theoretic Approach for Regulating Hazmat Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 424-438, May.
    8. Xu, Jiuping & Shu, Kejing & Wang, Fengjuan & Yang, Guocan, 2024. "Bi-level multi-objective distribution strategy integrating the permit trading scheme towards coal production capacity layout optimization: Case study from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Cerulli, Martina & Serra, Domenico & Sorgente, Carmine & Archetti, Claudia & Ljubić, Ivana, 2023. "Mathematical programming formulations for the Collapsed k-Core Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(1), pages 56-72.
    10. Chan Y. Han & Brian J. Lunday & Matthew J. Robbins, 2016. "A Game Theoretic Model for the Optimal Location of Integrated Air Defense System Missile Batteries," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 405-416, August.
    11. Lorenzo Lampariello & Simone Sagratella, 2015. "It is a matter of hierarchy: a Nash equilibrium problem perspective on bilevel programming," DIAG Technical Reports 2015-07, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    12. Grimm, Veronika & Schewe, Lars & Schmidt, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2017. "Uniqueness of market equilibrium on a network: A peak-load pricing approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 971-983.
    13. Wei Jiang & Huiqiang Wang & Bingyang Li & Haibin Lv & Qingchuan Meng, 2020. "A multi-user multi-operator computing pricing method for Internet of things based on bi-level optimization," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(1), pages 15501477199, January.
    14. Lei Fang & Hecheng Li, 2013. "Lower bound of cost efficiency measure in DEA with incomplete price information," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 219-226, October.
    15. Vivek Laha & Harsh Narayan Singh, 2023. "On quasidifferentiable mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Nair, Rahul & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2014. "Equilibrium network design of shared-vehicle systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 47-61.
    17. Mahdi Zarghami & Nasim Safari & Ferenc Szidarovszky & Shafiqul Islam, 2015. "Nonlinear Interval Parameter Programming Combined with Cooperative Games: a Tool for Addressing Uncertainty in Water Allocation Using Water Diplomacy Framework," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(12), pages 4285-4303, September.
    18. Magnus Hoffmann & Grégoire Rota‐Graziosi, 2020. "Endogenous timing in the presence of non‐monotonicities," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 359-402, February.
    19. Xu, Jiuping & Song, Xiaoling & Wu, Yimin & Zeng, Ziqiang, 2015. "GIS-modelling based coal-fired power plant site identification and selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 520-539.
    20. Küçükaydin, Hande & Aras, Necati & Kuban AltInel, I., 2011. "Competitive facility location problem with attractiveness adjustment of the follower: A bilevel programming model and its solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 206-220, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:215:y:2011:i:3:p:532-538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.