IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v206y2010i1p18-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural gas cash-out problem: Bilevel stochastic optimization approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kalashnikov, Vyacheslav V.
  • Pérez-Valdés, Gerardo A.
  • Tomasgard, Asgeir
  • Kalashnykova, Nataliya I.

Abstract

A stochastic formulation of the natural gas cash-out problem is given in a form of a bilevel multi-stage stochastic programming model with recourse. After reducing the original formulation to a bilevel linear problem, a stochastic scenario tree is defined by its node events, and time series forecasting is used to produce stochastic values for data of natural gas price and demand. Numerical experiments were run to compare the stochastic solution with the perfect information solution and the expected value solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalashnikov, Vyacheslav V. & Pérez-Valdés, Gerardo A. & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Kalashnykova, Nataliya I., 2010. "Natural gas cash-out problem: Bilevel stochastic optimization approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 18-33, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:206:y:2010:i:1:p:18-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(10)00123-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hawdon, David, 2003. "Efficiency, performance and regulation of the international gas industry--a bootstrap DEA approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(11), pages 1167-1178, September.
    2. Gabriel, Steven A. & Zhuang, Jifang & Kiet, Supat, 2005. "A large-scale linear complementarity model of the North American natural gas market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 639-665, July.
    3. Egging, Ruud & Gabriel, Steven A. & Holz, Franziska & Zhuang, Jifang, 2008. "A complementarity model for the European natural gas market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 2385-2414, July.
    4. Chiou, Suh-Wen, 2005. "Bilevel programming for the continuous transport network design problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 361-383, May.
    5. Cruz, F. R. B. & Smith, J. MacGregor & Mateus, G. R., 1999. "Algorithms for a multi-level network optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 164-180, October.
    6. David Hawdon, 2003. "Efficiency and Performance in the Gas Industry," Surrey Energy Economics Centre (SEEC), School of Economics Discussion Papers (SEEDS) 106, Surrey Energy Economics Centre (SEEC), School of Economics, University of Surrey.
    7. Arano, Kathleen G. & Blair, Benjamin F., 2008. "An ex-post welfare analysis of natural gas regulation in the industrial sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 789-806, May.
    8. Yang, Hai & Bell, Michael G. H., 2001. "Transport bilevel programming problems: recent methodological advances," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-4, January.
    9. Kabirian, Alireza & Hemmati, Mohammad Reza, 2007. "A strategic planning model for natural gas transmission networks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5656-5670, November.
    10. Dempe, Stephan & Kalashnikov, Vyacheslav & Rios-Mercado, Roger Z., 2005. "Discrete bilevel programming: Application to a natural gas cash-out problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(2), pages 469-488, October.
    11. Esnault, Benoit, 2003. "The need for regulation of gas storage: the case of France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 167-174, January.
    12. Ben-Ayed, Omar & Boyce, David E. & Blair, Charles E., 1988. "A general bilevel linear programming formulation of the network design problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 311-318, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alizadeh, S.M. & Marcotte, P. & Savard, G., 2013. "Two-stage stochastic bilevel programming over a transportation network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 92-105.
    2. Kovacevic, Raimund M. & Pflug, Georg Ch., 2014. "Electricity swing option pricing by stochastic bilevel optimization: A survey and new approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 389-403.
    3. Grimm, Veronika & Orlinskaya, Galina & Schewe, Lars & Schmidt, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2021. "Optimal design of retailer-prosumer electricity tariffs using bilevel optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Chen, Yizhong & He, Li & Li, Jing & Cheng, Xi & Lu, Hongwei, 2016. "An inexact bi-level simulation–optimization model for conjunctive regional renewable energy planning and air pollution control for electric power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 969-983.
    5. Dempe, Stephan & Kalashnikov, Vyacheslav V. & Pérez-Valdés, Gerardo A. & Kalashnykova, Nataliya I., 2011. "Natural gas bilevel cash-out problem: Convergence of a penalty function method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 532-538, December.
    6. Vyacheslav Kalashnikov & Gerardo Pérez & Nataliya Kalashnykova, 2010. "A linearization approach to solve the natural gas cash-out bilevel problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 423-442, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergei Schreider & Jonathan Plummer & Daniel McInnes & Boris Miller, 2015. "Sensitivity analysis of gas supply optimization models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 565-588, March.
    2. Brkic, Dejan, 2009. "Serbian gas sector in the spotlight of oil and gas agreement with Russia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1925-1938, May.
    3. Alireza Amirteimoori & Sohrab Kordrostami, 2012. "A distance-based measure of super efficiency in data envelopment analysis: an application to gas companies," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 117-128, September.
    4. Liang, Jinpeng & Wu, Jianjun & Gao, Ziyou & Sun, Huijun & Yang, Xin & Lo, Hong K., 2019. "Bus transit network design with uncertainties on the basis of a metro network: A two-step model framework," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 115-138.
    5. Gómez-Calvet, Roberto & Conesa, David & Gómez-Calvet, Ana Rosa & Tortosa-Ausina, Emili, 2014. "Energy efficiency in the European Union: What can be learned from the joint application of directional distance functions and slacks-based measures?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 137-154.
    6. Beáta Gavurová & Martina Halásková & Samuel Koróny, 2019. "Research and Development Indicators of EU28 Countries from Viewpoint of Super-efficiency DEA Analysis," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(1), pages 225-242.
    7. Chang, Chun Ping & Berdiev, Aziz N., 2011. "The political economy of energy regulation in OECD countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 816-825, September.
    8. Maarten J. Arentsen, 2011. "Trends in Gas," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2008. "A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Hassan Hamie & Anis Hoayek & Hans Auer, 2020. "Modeling Post-Liberalized European Gas Market Concentration—A Game Theory Perspective," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Jia, Weidong & Gong, Chengzhu & Pan, Kai & Yu, Shiwei, 2023. "Potential changes of regional natural gas market in China amidst liberalization: A mixed complementarity equilibrium simulation in 2030," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    12. Gong, Chengzhu & Wu, Desheng & Gong, Nianjiao & Qi, Rui, 2020. "Multi-agent mixed complementary simulation of natural gas upstream market liberalization in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    13. Egging-Bratseth, Ruud & Baltensperger, Tobias & Tomasgard, Asgeir, 2020. "Solving oligopolistic equilibrium problems with convex optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 44-52.
    14. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika & Ueno, Takahiro, 2010. "Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1675-1688, April.
    15. Ghazi, Amineh & Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, Farhad, 2019. "Assessment and budget allocation of Iranian natural gas distribution company- A CSW DEA based model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 112-118.
    16. Huang, Di & Liu, Zhiyuan & Liu, Pan & Chen, Jun, 2016. "Optimal transit fare and service frequency of a nonlinear origin-destination based fare structure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 1-19.
    17. Jan Abrell & Hannes Weigt, 2012. "Combining Energy Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 377-401, September.
    18. Egging, Ruud & Holz, Franziska & Gabriel, Steven A., 2010. "The World Gas Model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4016-4029.
    19. Yang, Wei & Shi, Jinfeng & Qiao, Han & Shao, Yanmin & Wang, Shouyang, 2017. "Regional technical efficiency of Chinese Iron and steel industry based on bootstrap network data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 14-24.
    20. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2008. "Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-14, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:206:y:2010:i:1:p:18-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.