IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v215y2011i2p383-392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discrete and continuous time representations and mathematical models for large production scheduling problems: A case study from the pharmaceutical industry

Author

Listed:
  • Stefansson, Hlynur
  • Sigmarsdottir, Sigrun
  • Jensson, Pall
  • Shah, Nilay

Abstract

The underlying time framework used is one of the major differences in the basic structure of mathematical programming formulations used for production scheduling problems. The models are either based on continuous or discrete time representations. In the literature there is no general agreement on which is better or more suitable for different types of production or business environments. In this paper we study a large real-world scheduling problem from a pharmaceutical company. The problem is at least NP-hard and cannot be solved with standard solution methods. We therefore decompose the problem into two parts and compare discrete and continuous time representations for solving the individual parts. Our results show pros and cons of each model. The continuous formulation can be used to solve larger test cases and it is also more accurate for the problem under consideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefansson, Hlynur & Sigmarsdottir, Sigrun & Jensson, Pall & Shah, Nilay, 2011. "Discrete and continuous time representations and mathematical models for large production scheduling problems: A case study from the pharmaceutical industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(2), pages 383-392, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:215:y:2011:i:2:p:383-392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221711005509
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Josef Kallrath, 1999. "Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming Applications," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Tito A. Ciriani & Stefano Gliozzi & Ellis L. Johnson & Roberto Tadei (ed.), Operational Research in Industry, chapter 3, pages 42-76, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Christodoulos Floudas & Xiaoxia Lin, 2005. "Mixed Integer Linear Programming in Process Scheduling: Modeling, Algorithms, and Applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 131-162, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seyed Ahmad Hosseini, 2013. "A Model-Based Approach and Analysis for Multi-Period Networks," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 486-512, May.
    2. Pulluru, Sai Jishna & Akkerman, Renzo, 2018. "Water-integrated scheduling of batch process plants: Modelling approach and application in technology selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 227-243.
    3. Tom Rihm & Norbert Trautmann & Adrian Zimmermann, 2018. "MIP formulations for an application of project scheduling in human resource management," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 609-639, December.
    4. Leachman, Robert C. & Johnston, Lenrick & Li, Shan & Shen, Zuo-Jun, 2014. "An automated planning engine for biopharmaceutical production," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 327-338.
    5. Mustafa, Faizan E & Ahmed, Ijaz & Basit, Abdul & Alvi, Um-E-Habiba & Malik, Saddam Hussain & Mahmood, Atif & Ali, Paghunda Roheela, 2023. "A review on effective alarm management systems for industrial process control: Barriers and opportunities," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    6. Voll, Philip & Jennings, Mark & Hennen, Maike & Shah, Nilay & Bardow, André, 2015. "The optimum is not enough: A near-optimal solution paradigm for energy systems synthesis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 446-456.
    7. Silvente, Javier & Aguirre, Adrián M. & Zamarripa, Miguel A. & Méndez, Carlos A. & Graells, Moisès & Espuña, Antonio, 2015. "Improved time representation model for the simultaneous energy supply and demand management in microgrids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 615-627.
    8. Sahling, Florian & Hahn, Gerd J., 2019. "Dynamic lot sizing in biopharmaceutical manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 96-106.
    9. Taho Yang & Shin-Yi Lin & Yu-Hsiu Hung & Chung-Chien Hong, 2022. "A Study on the Optimization of In-Process Inspection Procedure for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Manufacturing Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Baumann, Philipp & Trautmann, Norbert, 2014. "A hybrid method for large-scale short-term scheduling of make-and-pack production processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 718-735.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lara, Cristiana L. & Koenemann, Jochen & Nie, Yisu & de Souza, Cid C., 2023. "Scalable timing-aware network design via lagrangian decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 152-169.
    2. Yanina Fumero & Gabriela Corsano & Jorge Montagna, 2012. "Planning and scheduling of multistage multiproduct batch plants operating under production campaigns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 249-268, October.
    3. Farahmand, H. & Doorman, G.L., 2012. "Balancing market integration in the Northern European continent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 316-326.
    4. Abdelrahman Hosny & Sherief Reda, 2024. "Automatic MILP solver configuration by learning problem similarities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(1), pages 909-936, August.
    5. Moo-Sung Sohn & Jiwoong Choi & Hoseog Kang & In-Chan Choi, 2017. "Multiobjective Production Planning at LG Display," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 279-291, August.
    6. Mancuso, A. & Compare, M. & Salo, A. & Zio, E., 2021. "Optimal Prognostics and Health Management-driven inspection and maintenance strategies for industrial systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    7. Dujardin, Yann & Vanderpooten, Daniel & Boillot, Florence, 2015. "A multi-objective interactive system for adaptive traffic control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 601-610.
    8. Grzegorz Bocewicz & Zbigniew Banaszak & Izabela Nielsen, 2019. "Multimodal processes prototyping subject to grid-like network and fuzzy operation time constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 561-585, February.
    9. Mohammad Heydari & Yanan Fan & Kin Keung Lai, 2023. "A Robust Site Selection Model under uncertainty for Special Hospital Wards in Hong Kong," Papers 2307.11508, arXiv.org.
    10. Alix Vargas & Carmen Fuster & David Corne, 2020. "Towards Sustainable Collaborative Logistics Using Specialist Planning Algorithms and a Gain-Sharing Business Model: A UK Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-29, August.
    11. Joey Huchette & Joey Huchette, 2019. "A Combinatorial Approach for Small and Strong Formulations of Disjunctive Constraints," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 793-820, August.
    12. Gian Paramo & Arturo Bretas, 2023. "Proactive Frequency Stability Scheme: A Distributed Framework Based on Particle Filters and Synchrophasors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Qihao Liu & Xinyu Li & Liang Gao, 2021. "Mathematical modeling and a hybrid evolutionary algorithm for process planning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 781-797, March.
    14. Michael Naor & Gavriel David Pinto & Pini Davidov & Yuval Cohen & Linor Izchaki & Mukarram Hadieh & Malak Ghaith, 2024. "Vertical Takeoff and Landing for Distribution of Parcels to Hospitals: A Case Study about Industry 5.0 Application in Israel’s Healthcare Arena," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Mohammad Heydari & Kin Keung Lai, 2023. "Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Era and Sustainable Healthcare: Organization and Delivery of Health Economics Research (Principles and Clinical Practice)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-30, August.
    16. Khayyam, Hamid & Naebe, Minoo & Bab-Hadiashar, Alireza & Jamshidi, Farshid & Li, Quanxiang & Atkiss, Stephen & Buckmaster, Derek & Fox, Bronwyn, 2015. "Stochastic optimization models for energy management in carbonization process of carbon fiber production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 643-655.
    17. Raja Awais Liaqait & Shermeen Hamid & Salman Sagheer Warsi & Azfar Khalid, 2021. "A Critical Analysis of Job Shop Scheduling in Context of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Casey Chung & Milind Dawande & Divakar Rajamani & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2011. "A Short-Range Scheduling Model for Blockbuster's Order-Processing Operation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(5), pages 466-484, October.
    19. Ioannis Fragkos & Bert De Reyck, 2016. "Improving the Maritime Transshipment Operations of the Noble Group," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 203-217, April.
    20. Chung, S.H. & Lau, H.C.W. & Choy, K.L. & Ho, G.T.S. & Tse, Y.K., 2010. "Application of genetic approach for advanced planning in multi-factory environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 300-308, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:215:y:2011:i:2:p:383-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.