IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v215y2011i1p39-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-agent scheduling to minimize the total cost

Author

Listed:
  • Nong, Q.Q.
  • Cheng, T.C.E.
  • Ng, C.T.

Abstract

Two agents, each having his own set of jobs, compete to perform their own jobs on a common processing resource. Each job of the agents has a weight that specifies its importance. The cost of the first agent is the maximum weighted completion time of his jobs while the cost of the second agent is the total weighted completion time of his jobs. We consider the scheduling problem of determining the sequence of the jobs such that the total cost of the two agents is minimized. We provide a 2-approximation algorithm for the problem, show that the case where the number of jobs of the first agent is fixed is NP-hard, and devise a polynomial time approximation scheme for this case.

Suggested Citation

  • Nong, Q.Q. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Ng, C.T., 2011. "Two-agent scheduling to minimize the total cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 39-44, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:215:y:2011:i:1:p:39-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221711004899
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessandro Agnetis & Dario Pacciarelli & Andrea Pacifici, 2007. "Multi-agent single machine scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 3-15, March.
    2. Hamers, H. & Borm, P. & Tijs, S., 1993. "A Games Corresponding to Sequencing Situations with Ready Times," Papers 9316, Tilburg - Center for Economic Research.
    3. Curiel, I. & Pederzoli, G. & Tijs, S.H., 1989. "Sequencing games," Other publications TiSEM cd695be5-0f54-4548-a952-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Cheng, T.C.E. & Ng, C.T. & Yuan, J.J., 2008. "Multi-agent scheduling on a single machine with max-form criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 603-609, July.
    5. Hamers, H. & Borm, P. & Tijs, S., 1993. "A Games Corresponding to Sequencing Situations with Ready Times," Papers 9316, Tilburg - Center for Economic Research.
    6. Joseph Y.-T. Leung & Michael Pinedo & Guohua Wan, 2010. "Competitive Two-Agent Scheduling and Its Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 458-469, April.
    7. Allesandro Agnetis & Pitu B. Mirchandani & Dario Pacciarelli & Andrea Pacifici, 2004. "Scheduling Problems with Two Competing Agents," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 229-242, April.
    8. Curiel, Imma & Pederzoli, Giorgio & Tijs, Stef, 1989. "Sequencing games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 344-351, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wan, Long & Ding, Zhihao & Li, Yunpeng & Chen, Qianqian & Tan, Zhiyi, 2015. "Scheduling to minimize the maximum total completion time per machine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 45-50.
    2. Xing Chai & Lingfa Lu & Wenhua Li & Liqi Zhang, 2018. "Best-Possible Online Algorithms for Single Machine Scheduling to Minimize the Maximum Weighted Completion Time," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(06), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Fan, B.Q. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2016. "Two-agent scheduling in a flowshop," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 376-384.
    4. Zhang, Xingong, 2021. "Two competitive agents to minimize the weighted total late work and the total completion time," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 406(C).
    5. Yaodong Ni & Zhaojun Zhao, 2017. "Two-agent scheduling problem under fuzzy environment," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 739-748, March.
    6. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2014. "A common framework and taxonomy for multicriteria scheduling problems with interfering and competing jobs: Multi-agent scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 1-16.
    7. Byung-Gyoo Kim & Byung-Cheon Choi & Myoung-Ju Park, 2017. "Two-Machine and Two-Agent Flow Shop with Special Processing Times Structures," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(04), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Du-Juan Wang & Yunqiang Yin & Shuenn-Ren Cheng & T.C.E. Cheng & Chin-Chia Wu, 2016. "Due date assignment and scheduling on a single machine with two competing agents," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 1152-1169, February.
    9. Castillo, Berenice & Grogan-Kaylor, Andrew & Gleeson, Shannon M. & Ma, Julie, 2020. "Child externalizing behavior in context: Associations of mother nonstandard work, parenting, and neighborhoods," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen & Qi Feng, 2016. "Scheduling two job families on a single machine with two competitive agents," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 784-799, October.
    2. Cheng, T.C.E. & Ng, C.T. & Yuan, J.J., 2008. "Multi-agent scheduling on a single machine with max-form criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 603-609, July.
    3. Mor, Baruch & Mosheiov, Gur, 2010. "Scheduling problems with two competing agents to minimize minmax and minsum earliness measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 540-546, November.
    4. van Velzen, S. & Hamers, H.J.M., 2002. "On the Balancedness of Relaxed Sequencing Games," Discussion Paper 2002-49, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    5. Borm, Peter & Fiestras-Janeiro, Gloria & Hamers, Herbert & Sanchez, Estela & Voorneveld, Mark, 2002. "On the convexity of games corresponding to sequencing situations with due dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(3), pages 616-634, February.
    6. Suijs, Jeroen & Borm, Peter & De Waegenaere, Anja & Tijs, Stef, 1999. "Cooperative games with stochastic payoffs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 193-205, February.
    7. Hamers, Herbert & Klijn, Flip & Suijs, Jeroen, 1999. "On the balancedness of multiple machine sequencing games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 678-691, December.
    8. Grundel, Soesja & Çiftçi, Barış & Borm, Peter & Hamers, Herbert, 2013. "Family sequencing and cooperation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 414-424.
    9. Ren-Xia Chen & Shi-Sheng Li, 2019. "Two-agent single-machine scheduling with cumulative deterioration," 4OR, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 201-219, June.
    10. Min Ji & Sai Liu & Xiaolin Zhang & Keke Cao & T. C. E. Cheng, 2017. "Sequencing Games with Slack Due Windows and Group Technology Considerations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(2), pages 121-133, February.
    11. Omri Dover & Dvir Shabtay, 2016. "Single machine scheduling with two competing agents, arbitrary release dates and unit processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 145-178, March.
    12. Xiaoqiang Cai & George L. Vairaktarakis, 2012. "Coordination of Outsourced Operations at a Third-Party Facility Subject to Booking, Overtime, and Tardiness Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1436-1450, December.
    13. Herbert Hamers & Flip Klijn & Bas van Velzen, 2002. "On Games corresponding to Sequencing Situations with Precedence Relations," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 553.02, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    14. Gerichhausen, M. & Hamers, H.J.M., 2007. "Partitioning Sequencing Situations and Games," Discussion Paper 2007-40, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    15. Hamers, Herbert, 1997. "On the concavity of delivery games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 445-458, June.
    16. Tolga Aydinliyim & George L. Vairaktarakis, 2010. "Coordination of Outsourced Operations to Minimize Weighted Flow Time and Capacity Booking Costs," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 236-255, January.
    17. Gerichhausen, Marloes & Hamers, Herbert, 2009. "Partitioning sequencing situations and games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 207-216, July.
    18. van Velzen, Bas & Hamers, Herbert & Solymosi, Tamas, 2008. "Core stability in chain-component additive games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 116-139, January.
    19. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2014. "A common framework and taxonomy for multicriteria scheduling problems with interfering and competing jobs: Multi-agent scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 1-16.
    20. Pedro Calleja & Peter Borm & Herbert Hamers & Flip Klijn & Marco Slikker, 2002. "On a New Class of Parallel Sequencing Situations and Related Games," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 265-277, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:215:y:2011:i:1:p:39-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.