IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v238y2016i1d10.1007_s10479-015-2054-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Single machine scheduling with two competing agents, arbitrary release dates and unit processing times

Author

Listed:
  • Omri Dover

    (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)

  • Dvir Shabtay

    (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)

Abstract

We study various single machine scheduling problems with two competing agents, unit processing times and arbitrary integer release dates. The problems differ by the scheduling criterion used by each of the two agents, and by the variant of the bicriteria problem that has to be solved. We prove that when the scheduling criterion of either one of the two agents is of a max-type, then all considered variants of the bicriteria problem are solvable in polynomial time. However, when the two agents have a sum-type of scheduling criterion, several variants of the bicriteria problem become $$\mathcal {NP}$$ NP -hard.

Suggested Citation

  • Omri Dover & Dvir Shabtay, 2016. "Single machine scheduling with two competing agents, arbitrary release dates and unit processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 145-178, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:238:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-015-2054-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-015-2054-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-015-2054-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-015-2054-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorit S. Hochbaum & Ron Shamir, 1991. "Strongly Polynomial Algorithms for the High Multiplicity Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 648-653, August.
    2. Mosheiov, Gur & Yovel, Uri, 2006. "Minimizing weighted earliness-tardiness and due-date cost with unit processing-time jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(2), pages 528-544, July.
    3. Donatas Elvikis & Vincent T’kindt, 2014. "Two-agent scheduling on uniform parallel machines with min-max criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 79-94, February.
    4. Shlomo Karhi & Dvir Shabtay, 2013. "On the optimality of the TLS algorithm for solving the online-list scheduling problem with two job types on a set of multipurpose machines," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 198-222, July.
    5. Lee, Wen-Chiung & Wu, Chin-Chia & Hsu, Peng-Hsiang, 2010. "A single-machine learning effect scheduling problem with release times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(1-2), pages 3-11, February.
    6. Mitre Dourado & Rosiane Rodrigues & Jayme Szwarcfiter, 2009. "Scheduling unit time jobs with integer release dates to minimize the weighted number of tardy jobs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 81-91, July.
    7. Li, Chung-Lun, 2006. "Scheduling unit-length jobs with machine eligibility restrictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 1325-1328, October.
    8. Dvir Shabtay & Omri Dover & Moshe Kaspi, 2015. "Single-machine two-agent scheduling involving a just-in-time criterion," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(9), pages 2590-2604, May.
    9. Allesandro Agnetis & Pitu B. Mirchandani & Dario Pacciarelli & Andrea Pacifici, 2004. "Scheduling Problems with Two Competing Agents," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 229-242, April.
    10. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2014. "A common framework and taxonomy for multicriteria scheduling problems with interfering and competing jobs: Multi-agent scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 1-16.
    11. Mosheiov, Gur & Oron, Daniel, 2008. "Open-shop batch scheduling with identical jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1282-1292, June.
    12. Joseph Y.-T. Leung & Michael Pinedo & Guohua Wan, 2010. "Competitive Two-Agent Scheduling and Its Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 458-469, April.
    13. Nikhil Bansal & Tracy Kimbrel & Maxim Sviridenko, 2006. "Job Shop Scheduling with Unit Processing Times," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 381-389, May.
    14. Alessandro Agnetis & Dario Pacciarelli & Andrea Pacifici, 2007. "Multi-agent single machine scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 3-15, March.
    15. Lee, Wen-Chiung & Shiau, Yau-Ren & Chen, Shiuan-Kang & Wu, Chin-Chia, 2010. "A two-machine flowshop scheduling problem with deteriorating jobs and blocking," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 188-197, March.
    16. Mor, Baruch & Mosheiov, Gur, 2011. "Single machine batch scheduling with two competing agents to minimize total flowtime," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 524-531, December.
    17. Cheng, T.C.E. & Ng, C.T. & Yuan, J.J., 2008. "Multi-agent scheduling on a single machine with max-form criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 603-609, July.
    18. Shabtay, Dvir & Arviv, Kfir & Stern, Helman & Edan, Yael, 2014. "A combined robot selection and scheduling problem for flow-shops with no-wait restrictions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 96-107.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Haowei & Xie, Junwei & Ge, Jiaang & Zhang, Zhaojian & Zong, Binfeng, 2019. "A hybrid adaptively genetic algorithm for task scheduling problem in the phased array radar," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 868-878.
    2. Shesh Narayan Sahu & Yuvraj Gajpal & Swapan Debbarma, 2018. "Two-agent-based single-machine scheduling with switchover time to minimize total weighted completion time and makespan objectives," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 623-640, October.
    3. Yunqiang Yin & Doudou Li & Dujuan Wang & T. C. E. Cheng, 2021. "Single-machine serial-batch delivery scheduling with two competing agents and due date assignment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 497-523, March.
    4. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen, 2023. "Competitive two-agent scheduling with release dates and preemption on a single machine," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 227-249, June.
    5. Chen, Rubing & Geng, Zhichao & Lu, Lingfa & Yuan, Jinjiang & Zhang, Yuan, 2022. "Pareto-scheduling of two competing agents with their own equal processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 414-431.
    6. Yuan Zhang & Jinjiang Yuan & Chi To Ng & Tai Chiu E. Cheng, 2021. "Pareto‐optimization of three‐agent scheduling to minimize the total weighted completion time, weighted number of tardy jobs, and total weighted late work," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(3), pages 378-393, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Omri Dover & Dvir Shabtay, 2016. "Single machine scheduling with two competing agents, arbitrary release dates and unit processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 145-178, March.
    2. Oron, Daniel & Shabtay, Dvir & Steiner, George, 2015. "Single machine scheduling with two competing agents and equal job processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 86-99.
    3. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen & Qi Feng, 2016. "Scheduling two job families on a single machine with two competitive agents," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 784-799, October.
    4. Fan, B.Q. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2016. "Two-agent scheduling in a flowshop," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 376-384.
    5. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen, 2023. "Competitive two-agent scheduling with release dates and preemption on a single machine," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 227-249, June.
    6. Byung-Gyoo Kim & Byung-Cheon Choi & Myoung-Ju Park, 2017. "Two-Machine and Two-Agent Flow Shop with Special Processing Times Structures," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(04), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Shesh Narayan Sahu & Yuvraj Gajpal & Swapan Debbarma, 2018. "Two-agent-based single-machine scheduling with switchover time to minimize total weighted completion time and makespan objectives," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 623-640, October.
    8. Ren-Xia Chen & Shi-Sheng Li, 2019. "Two-agent single-machine scheduling with cumulative deterioration," 4OR, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 201-219, June.
    9. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2014. "A common framework and taxonomy for multicriteria scheduling problems with interfering and competing jobs: Multi-agent scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 1-16.
    10. Zhang Xingong & Wang Yong, 2017. "Two-agent scheduling problems on a single-machine to minimize the total weighted late work," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 945-955, April.
    11. Yaodong Ni & Zhaojun Zhao, 2017. "Two-agent scheduling problem under fuzzy environment," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 739-748, March.
    12. Yunqiang Yin & T. C. E. Cheng & Du-Juan Wang & Chin-Chia Wu, 2017. "Two-agent flowshop scheduling to maximize the weighted number of just-in-time jobs," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 313-335, August.
    13. Zhang, Xingong, 2021. "Two competitive agents to minimize the weighted total late work and the total completion time," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 406(C).
    14. Wan, Long & Yuan, Jinjiang & Wei, Lijun, 2016. "Pareto optimization scheduling with two competing agents to minimize the number of tardy jobs and the maximum cost," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 912-923.
    15. Hermelin, Danny & Kubitza, Judith-Madeleine & Shabtay, Dvir & Talmon, Nimrod & Woeginger, Gerhard J., 2019. "Scheduling two agents on a single machine: A parameterized analysis of NP-hard problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 275-286.
    16. Nong, Q.Q. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Ng, C.T., 2011. "Two-agent scheduling to minimize the total cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 39-44, November.
    17. Cheng He & Chunqi Xu & Hao Lin, 2020. "Serial-batching scheduling with two agents to minimize makespan and maximum cost," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 609-617, October.
    18. Ruyan He & Jinjiang Yuan, 2020. "Two-Agent Preemptive Pareto-Scheduling to Minimize Late Work and Other Criteria," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Jun Pei & Jinling Wei & Baoyu Liao & Xinbao Liu & Panos M. Pardalos, 2020. "Two-agent scheduling on bounded parallel-batching machines with an aging effect of job-position-dependent," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 191-223, November.
    20. Chen, Rubing & Geng, Zhichao & Lu, Lingfa & Yuan, Jinjiang & Zhang, Yuan, 2022. "Pareto-scheduling of two competing agents with their own equal processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 414-431.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:238:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-015-2054-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.