IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecofin/v60y2022ics1062940822000195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuing lookback options with barrier

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Hangsuck
  • Kim, Eunchae
  • Ko, Bangwon

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a new class of exotic options, termed lookback-barrier options, which literally combine lookback and barrier options by incorporating an activating barrier condition into the European lookback payoff. A prototype of lookback-barrier option was first proposed by Bermin (1998), where he intended to reduce the expensive cost of lookback option by considering lookback options with barrier. However, despite his novel trial, it has not attracted much attention yet. Thus, in this paper, we revisit the idea and extend the horizon of lookback-barrier option in order to enhance the marketability and applicability to equity-linked investments. Devising a variety of payoffs, this paper develops a complete valuation framework which allows for closed-form pricing formulas under the Black–Scholes model. Our closed-form pricing formulas provide a substantial advantage over the method of Monte Carlo simulation, because the extrema appearing in both of the lookback payoff and barrier condition would require a large number of simulations for exact calculation. Complexities involved in the derivation process would be resolved by the Esscher transform and the reflection principle of the Brownian motion. We illustrate our results with numerical examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Hangsuck & Kim, Eunchae & Ko, Bangwon, 2022. "Valuing lookback options with barrier," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:60:y:2022:i:c:s1062940822000195
    DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2022.101660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940822000195
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101660?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goldman, M Barry & Sosin, Howard B & Gatto, Mary Ann, 1979. "Path Dependent Options: "Buy at the Low, Sell at the High"," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 34(5), pages 1111-1127, December.
    2. Peter Buchen & Otto Konstandatos, 2005. "A New Method Of Pricing Lookback Options," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 245-259, April.
    3. Lee, Hangsuck & Ko, Bangwon & Song, Seongjoo, 2019. "Valuing step barrier options and their icicled variations," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 396-411.
    4. Conze, Antoine & Viswanathan, 1991. "Path Dependent Options: The Case of Lookback Options," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 46(5), pages 1893-1907, December.
    5. Goldman, M Barry & Sosin, Howard B & Shepp, Lawrence A, 1979. "On Contingent Claims That Insure Ex-post Optimal Stock Market Timing," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 34(2), pages 401-413, May.
    6. Hans Gerber & Elias Shiu, 2003. "Pricing Lookback Options and Dynamic Guarantees," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 48-66.
    7. Naoto Kunitomo & Masayuki Ikeda, 1992. "Pricing Options With Curved Boundaries1," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(4), pages 275-298, October.
    8. R. C. Heynen & H. M. Kat, 1995. "Lookback options with discrete and partial monitoring of the underlying price," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(4), pages 273-284.
    9. Lee, Hangsuck, 2003. "Pricing equity-indexed annuities with path-dependent options," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 677-690, December.
    10. Ko, Bangwon & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Wei, Li, 2010. "Pricing maturity guarantee with dynamic withdrawal benefit," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 216-223, October.
    11. Serena Tiong, 2000. "Valuing Equity-Indexed Annuities," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 149-163.
    12. Hélyette Geman & Marc Yor, 1996. "Pricing And Hedging Double‐Barrier Options: A Probabilistic Approach," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(4), pages 365-378, October.
    13. Hans-Peter Bermin & Peter Buchen & Otto Konstandatos, 2008. "Two Exotic Lookback Options," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 387-402.
    14. Lee, Hangsuck & Ahn, Soohan & Ko, Bangwon, 2019. "Generalizing the reflection principle of Brownian motion, and closed-form pricing of barrier options and autocallable investments," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Hangsuck & Ha, Hongjun & Lee, Minha, 2022. "Foreign equity lookback options with guarantees," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Hangsuck & Ha, Hongjun & Lee, Minha, 2023. "Partial quanto lookback options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Hangsuck Lee & Gaeun Lee & Seongjoo Song, 2022. "Multi‐step reflection principle and barrier options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 692-721, April.
    3. Kim, Geonwoo & Jeon, Junkee, 2018. "Closed-form solutions for valuing partial lookback options with random initiation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 321-327.
    4. Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Yang, Hailiang, 2012. "Valuing equity-linked death benefits and other contingent options: A discounted density approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 73-92.
    5. Hangsuck Lee & Gaeun Lee & Seongjoo Song, 2021. "Multi-step Reflection Principle and Barrier Options," Papers 2105.15008, arXiv.org.
    6. Peter Buchen & Otto Konstandatos, 2009. "A New Approach to Pricing Double-Barrier Options with Arbitrary Payoffs and Exponential Boundaries," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 497-515.
    7. Lee, Hangsuck & Lee, Gaeun & Song, Seongjoo, 2023. "Min–max multi-step barrier options and their variants," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Hans-Peter Bermin & Peter Buchen & Otto Konstandatos, 2008. "Two Exotic Lookback Options," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 387-402.
    9. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    10. Qian, Linyi & Wang, Wei & Wang, Rongming & Tang, Yincai, 2010. "Valuation of equity-indexed annuity under stochastic mortality and interest rate," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 123-129, October.
    11. Sun-Yong Choi & Ji-Hun Yoon & Junkee Jeon, 2019. "Pricing of Fixed-Strike Lookback Options on Assets with Default Risk," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-10, January.
    12. Lee, Hangsuck & Lee, Minha & Ko, Bangwon, 2022. "A semi-analytic valuation of two-asset barrier options and autocallable products using Brownian bridge," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    13. Antoon Pelsser, "undated". "Pricing Double Barrier Options: An Analytical Approach," Computing in Economics and Finance 1997 130, Society for Computational Economics.
    14. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5374 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Hoi Wong & Yue Kwok, 2003. "Sub-Replication and Replenishing Premium: Efficient Pricing of Multi-State Lookbacks," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 83-106, May.
    16. San‐Lin Chung & Yi‐Ta Huang & Pai‐Ta Shih & Jr‐Yan Wang, 2019. "Semistatic hedging and pricing American floating strike lookback options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 418-434, April.
    17. Deng, Guohe, 2020. "Pricing perpetual American floating strike lookback option under multiscale stochastic volatility model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    18. Kijima, Masaaki & Wong, Tony, 2007. "Pricing of Ratchet equity-indexed annuities under stochastic interest rates," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 317-338, November.
    19. Farid Aitsahlia & Tzeung Le Lai, 1998. "Random walk duality and the valuation of discrete lookback options," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3-4), pages 227-240.
    20. Peter Buchen & Hamish Malloch, 2014. "CLA's, PLA's and a new method for pricing general passport options," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(7), pages 1201-1209, July.
    21. Lee, Hangsuck & Ha, Hongjun & Lee, Minha, 2021. "Valuation of piecewise linear barrier options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Barrier option; Black–Scholes model; Esscher transform; Lookback option; Lookback-barrier option;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:60:y:2022:i:c:s1062940822000195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.