IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/19970015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pricing Double Barrier Options: An Analytical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Antoon Pelsser

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam and ING)

Abstract

Double barrier options have become popular instruments in derivative markets. Several papers_new have already analyseddouble knock-out call and put options using different methods. In a recent paper, Geman and Yor (1996) deriveexpressions for the Laplace transform of the double barrrier option price. However, they have to resort to numericalinversion of the Laplace transform to obtain option prices. In this paper, we are able to solve, using contour integration,the inverse of the Laplace transforms analytically thereby eliminating the need for numerical inversion routines. To ourknowledge, this is one of the first applications of contour integration to option pricing problems. To illustrate the power ofthis method, we derive analytical valuation formulas for a much wider variety of double barrier options than has beentreated in the literature so far. Many of these variants are nowadays being traded in the markets. Especially, options whichpay a fixed amount of money (a "rebate") as soon as one of the barriers is hit and double barrier knock-in options.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoon Pelsser, 1997. "Pricing Double Barrier Options: An Analytical Approach," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 97-015/2, Tinbergen Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:19970015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/97015.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert C. Merton, 2005. "Theory of rational option pricing," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Sudipto Bhattacharya & George M Constantinides (ed.), Theory Of Valuation, chapter 8, pages 229-288, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Goldman, M Barry & Sosin, Howard B & Gatto, Mary Ann, 1979. "Path Dependent Options: "Buy at the Low, Sell at the High"," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 34(5), pages 1111-1127, December.
    3. Naoto Kunitomo & Masayuki Ikeda, 1992. "Pricing Options With Curved Boundaries1," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(4), pages 275-298, October.
    4. Hélyette Geman & Marc Yor, 1996. "Pricing And Hedging Double‐Barrier Options: A Probabilistic Approach," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(4), pages 365-378, October.
    5. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dell'Era Mario, M.D., 2008. "Pricing of Double Barrier Options by Spectral Theory," MPRA Paper 17502, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Xiang Wang & Jessica Li & Jichun Li, 2023. "A Deep Learning Based Numerical PDE Method for Option Pricing," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(1), pages 149-164, June.
    3. Dell'Era Mario, M.D., 2008. "Pricing of the European Options by Spectral Theory," MPRA Paper 17429, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. C. Atkinson & S. Kazantzaki, 2009. "Double knock-out Asian barrier options which widen or contract as they approach maturity," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 329-340.
    5. Sbuelz, A., 2000. "Hedging Double Barriers with Singles," Discussion Paper 2000-112, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    6. Dmitry Davydov & Vadim Linetsky, 2001. "Pricing and Hedging Path-Dependent Options Under the CEV Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(7), pages 949-965, July.
    7. Pancs Romans, 2010. "Communication, Innovation, and Growth," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-54, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun, Doobae & Ku, Hyejin, 2015. "Static hedging of chained-type barrier options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 317-327.
    2. Jos� Carlos Dias & João Pedro Vidal Nunes & João Pedro Ruas, 2015. "Pricing and static hedging of European-style double barrier options under the jump to default extended CEV model," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(12), pages 1995-2010, December.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5374 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. U Hou Lok & Yuh‐Dauh Lyuu, 2020. "Efficient trinomial trees for local‐volatility models in pricing double‐barrier options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 556-574, April.
    5. Marianito R. Rodrigo, 2020. "Pricing of Barrier Options on Underlying Assets with Jump-Diffusion Dynamics: A Mellin Transform Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Rahman Farnoosh & Hamidreza Rezazadeh & Amirhossein Sobhani & M. Hossein Beheshti, 2016. "A Numerical Method for Discrete Single Barrier Option Pricing with Time-Dependent Parameters," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 48(1), pages 131-145, June.
    7. Andrew Ming-Long Wang & Yu-Hong Liu & Yi-Long Hsiao, 2009. "Barrier option pricing: a hybrid method approach," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 341-352.
    8. Dmitry Davydov & Vadim Linetsky, 2003. "Pricing Options on Scalar Diffusions: An Eigenfunction Expansion Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 185-209, April.
    9. Hsu, Yu-Sheng & Chen, Pei-Chun & Wu, Cheng-Hsun, 2022. "Double-barrier option pricing equations under extended geometric Brownian motion with bankruptcy risk," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Zhang, Xiaoyuan & Zhang, Tianqi, 2023. "On pricing double-barrier options with Markov regime switching," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    11. Wang, Heqian & Zhang, Jiayi & Zhou, Ke, 2022. "On pricing of vulnerable barrier options and vulnerable double barrier options," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    12. Jérôme Detemple, 1999. "American Options: Symmetry Properties," CIRANO Working Papers 99s-45, CIRANO.
    13. Bjork, Tomas, 2009. "Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780199574742.
    14. Marcos Escobar-Anel & Matt Davison & Yichen Zhu, 2022. "Derivatives-based portfolio decisions: an expected utility insight," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 217-246, June.
    15. Leunglung Chan & Song-Ping Zhu, 2014. "An exact and explicit formula for pricing lookback options with regime switching," Papers 1407.4864, arXiv.org.
    16. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    17. Suresh M. Sundaresan, 2000. "Continuous‐Time Methods in Finance: A Review and an Assessment," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1569-1622, August.
    18. Peter Buchen & Otto Konstandatos, 2009. "A New Approach to Pricing Double-Barrier Options with Arbitrary Payoffs and Exponential Boundaries," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 497-515.
    19. J. Mart'in Ovejero, 2022. "Vanna-Volga pricing for single and double barrier FX options," Papers 2211.12652, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    20. Ha, Mijin & Kim, Donghyun & Yoon, Ji-Hun, 2024. "Valuing of timer path-dependent options," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 208-227.
    21. Zhang, Jiayi & Zhou, Ke, 2024. "Analytical valuation of vulnerable chained options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:19970015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.