IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v91y2018icp105-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Children's influence on dual residence arrangements: Exploring decision-making practices

Author

Listed:
  • Berman, Rakel

Abstract

Dual residence, where children live with each parent for approximately equal amounts of time, is increasingly common for children who have experienced parental separation or divorce. This article explores the perspectives of Swedish children growing up in dual residence arrangements, focusing on their influence over the residence arrangements and practices therein. Alternating one's home life across two households requires organizing and a great deal of decision-making to make everyday life work for children and their families. Drawing on twenty qualitative in-depth interviews with children aged 9 to 17, this paper explores these decision-making practices. Findings demonstrate that children want to have the choice to influence and take part in the decision-making practices of their dual-residence arrangements, and that most children do influence the way their dual-residence arrangements are shaped albeit to different degrees. However, some children are prevented from having this influence despite their wish to have a say. Barriers and enablers are further discussed in relation to children's influence within their families.

Suggested Citation

  • Berman, Rakel, 2018. "Children's influence on dual residence arrangements: Exploring decision-making practices," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 105-114.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:105-114
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.05.038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740918301221
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.05.038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cashmore, Judy, 2011. "Children's participation in family law decision-making: Theoretical approaches to understanding children's views," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 515-520, April.
    2. Fransson, Emma & Sarkadi, Anna & Hjern, Anders & Bergström, Malin, 2016. "Why should they live more with one of us when they are children to us both?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 154-160.
    3. An Katrien Sodermans & Koen Matthijs & Gray Swicegood, 2013. "Characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 28(29), pages 821-848.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lehtme, Rafaela, 2024. "Child-centred approach to shared parenting: Children’s experiences of bird’s nest parenting arrangements," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guido de Blasio & Daniela Vuri, 2019. "Effects of the Joint Custody Law in Italy," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 479-514, September.
    2. Zuzana Zilincikova & Christine Schnor, 2023. "Trends in Distance Between Non-resident Parents and Minor Children Following Separation: Analysis of the Belgian Case, 1992–2018," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 39(1), pages 1-35, December.
    3. Nouman, Hani & Enosh, Guy & Niselbaum-Atzur, Pnina, 2016. "The role of parental communication, child's wishes and child's gender in social workers' custody recommendations," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 302-308.
    4. Carole Bonnet & Bertrand Garbinti & Anne Solaz, 2022. "Does Part-Time Mothering Help Get a Job? The Role of Shared Custody in Women’s Employment," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(5), pages 885-913, December.
    5. Jani Turunen & Maria Brandén & Karin Lundström, 2023. "Geographical distance between child and parent after a union dissolution in Sweden, 1974–2011," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 48(17), pages 439-482.
    6. Ragni Hege Kitterød & Jan Lyngstad, 2014. "Characteristics of parents with shared residence and father sole custody. Evidence from Norway 2012," Discussion Papers 780, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    7. Lara Augustijn, 2023. "Post-separation Care Arrangements and Parents’ Life Satisfaction: Can the Quality of Co-parenting and Frequency of Interparental Conflict Explain the Relationship?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1319-1338, April.
    8. Kelly, Cara & Anthony, Elizabeth K. & Krysik, Judy, 2019. "“How am I doing?” narratives of youth living in congregate care on their social-emotional well-being," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 255-263.
    9. José Félix Muñoz Soro & Carlos Serrano-Cinca, 2021. "A model for predicting court decisions on child custody," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Bates, Shona & Kayess, Rosemary & Laurens, Edgar Julian & Katz, Ilan, 2024. "The importance of supporting evolving capacity: The need to support young people with cognitive impairment in out-of-home-care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Gal, Tali, 2017. "An ecological model of child and youth participation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 57-64.
    12. Simmel, Cassandra, 2012. "Highlighting adolescents' involvement with the child welfare system: A review of recent trends, policy developments, and related research," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1197-1207.
    13. Christine Schnor & Sofie Vanassche & Jan Van Bavel, 2017. "Stepfather or biological father? Education-specific pathways of postdivorce fatherhood," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(51), pages 1659-1694.
    14. Dries Van Gasse & Dimitri Mortelmans, 2020. "Single Mothers’ Perspectives on the Combination of Motherhood and Work," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Fransson, Emma & Sarkadi, Anna & Hjern, Anders & Bergström, Malin, 2016. "Why should they live more with one of us when they are children to us both?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 154-160.
    16. Mats Lillehagen & Martin Arstad Isungset, 2020. "New Partner, New Order? Multipartnered Fertility and Birth Order Effects on Educational Achievement," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(5), pages 1625-1646, October.
    17. An Sodermans & Sarah Botterman & Nele Havermans & Koen Matthijs, 2015. "Involved Fathers, Liberated Mothers? Joint Physical Custody and the Subjective Well-being of Divorced Parents," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 257-277, May.
    18. Frederique Van Spijker & Matthijs Kalmijn & Ruben van Gaalen, 2022. "The long-term improvement in father–child relationships after divorce: Descriptive findings from the Netherlands," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 46(15), pages 441-452.
    19. Milla Salin & Daniel R. Meyer & Mia Hakovirta & Eija Lindroos, 2024. "Factors Associated with the Joint Physical Custody of European Children," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 43(4), pages 1-25, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:105-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.