IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v33y2011i4p515-520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Children's participation in family law decision-making: Theoretical approaches to understanding children's views

Author

Listed:
  • Cashmore, Judy

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore children's views about their involvement in the post-separation arrangements that were made in their families and via the court process in the light of three theoretical models. It distinguishes between various aspects of children's participation, a term that carries a number of meanings and is used in various ways. In particular, it examines children's reasons for wanting to be involved or not, and the association between the amount of say children thought they had had, how much say they wanted, and the perceived fairness of the arrangements and their happiness with them.

Suggested Citation

  • Cashmore, Judy, 2011. "Children's participation in family law decision-making: Theoretical approaches to understanding children's views," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 515-520, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:33:y:2011:i:4:p:515-520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(10)00152-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kelly, Cara & Anthony, Elizabeth K. & Krysik, Judy, 2019. "“How am I doing?” narratives of youth living in congregate care on their social-emotional well-being," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 255-263.
    2. Berman, Rakel, 2018. "Children's influence on dual residence arrangements: Exploring decision-making practices," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 105-114.
    3. Gal, Tali, 2017. "An ecological model of child and youth participation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 57-64.
    4. Simmel, Cassandra, 2012. "Highlighting adolescents' involvement with the child welfare system: A review of recent trends, policy developments, and related research," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1197-1207.
    5. Bates, Shona & Kayess, Rosemary & Laurens, Edgar Julian & Katz, Ilan, 2024. "The importance of supporting evolving capacity: The need to support young people with cognitive impairment in out-of-home-care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:33:y:2011:i:4:p:515-520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.