IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v109y2018icp265-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reputation-based coevolution of link weights promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Hao
  • Chu, Chen
  • Shen, Chen
  • Shi, Lei

Abstract

Understanding and explaining the widespread cooperative behavior in society has become one open question. Many previous studies have been investigated this issue on static and unweight network, which is inconsistent with the realistic in sometimes. Motivated by this point, we consider a new setup about reputation-based dynamical weighted network. In particular, an individual with high reputation can receive a reward and its link weight will increase, while the individual with lowest reputation will be punished. Here, we introduce a parameter δ to control the range of link weight. Through numeric simulations, we find that coevolution setup can promote the evolution of cooperation. Particular, the larger value of δ, the higher level of cooperation. For the potential reason, we find it is related to the heterogeneous distribution of link weights.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Hao & Chu, Chen & Shen, Chen & Shi, Lei, 2018. "Reputation-based coevolution of link weights promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 265-268.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:109:y:2018:i:c:p:265-268
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.02.035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096007791830095X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.02.035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorgen W. Weibull, 1997. "Evolutionary Game Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262731215, December.
    2. repec:hhs:iuiwop:487 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Zi-Ren & Deng, Zheng-Hong & Wang, Huan-Bo & Qu, Yun, 2021. "Moderate irrational sentiment-driven fitness can promote cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    2. Zhu, Zhewen & Dong, Yuting & Lu, Yikang & Shi, Lei, 2021. "Information exchange promotes and jeopardizes cooperation on interdependent networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 569(C).
    3. Deng, Lili & Zhang, Xingxing & Wang, Cheng, 2021. "Coevolution of spatial ultimatum game and link weight promotes fairness," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    4. Wu, Yu’e & Zhang, Zhipeng & Yang, Guoli & Liu, Haixin & Zhang, Qingfeng, 2022. "Evolution of cooperation driven by diversity on a double-layer square lattice," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Quan, Ji & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Evidential reasoning based on imitation and aspiration information in strategy learning promotes cooperation in optional spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Lu, Shounan & Zhu, Ge & Zhang, Lianzhong, 2023. "Antisocial behavior-based environmental feedback in spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Liangliang Chang & Zhipeng Zhang & Chengyi Xia, 2023. "Impact of Decision Feedback on Networked Evolutionary Game with Delays in Control Channel," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 783-800, September.
    8. Kabir, K.M. Ariful & Shahidul Islam, MD & Utsumi, Shinobu & Tanimoto, Jun, 2023. "The emergence of rich complex dynamics in a spatial dyadic game with resource storage, participation cost, and agent interaction propensity," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    9. Huang, Yi Jie & Deng, Zheng Hong & Song, Qun & Wu, Tao & Deng, Zhi Long & Gao, Ming yu, 2019. "The evolution of cooperation in multi-games with aspiration-driven updating rule," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 313-317.
    10. Zhu, Wenqiang & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng, 2022. "Exposure-based reputation mechanism promotes the evolution of cooperation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    11. Quan, Ji & Tang, Caixia & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Reputation evaluation with tolerance and reputation-dependent imitation on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Li, Xiaoyu & Jia, Danyang & Niu, Xiaotong & Liu, Chen & Zhu, Peican & Liu, Dujuan & Chu, Chen, 2022. "Ability-based asymmetrical fitness calculation promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 412(C).
    13. Deng, Zheng-Hong & Huang, Yi-Jie & Gu, Zhi-Yang & Liu, Dan & Gao, Li, 2018. "Multigames with voluntary participation on interdependent networks and the evolution of cooperation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 151-157.
    14. Shu, Feng & Li, Min & Liu, Xingwen, 2019. "Memory mechanism with weighting promotes cooperation in the evolutionary games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 17-24.
    15. Han, Weiwei & Zhang, Zhipeng & Sun, Junqing & Xia, Chengyi, 2022. "Role of reputation constraints in the spatial public goods game with second-order reputation evaluation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    16. Liu, Chengwei & Wang, Juan & Li, Xiaopeng & Xia, Chengyi, 2020. "The link weight adjustment considering historical strategy promotes the cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 554(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dufwenberg, Martin, 1997. "Some relationships between evolutionary stability criteria in games," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 45-50, November.
    2. Lichi Zhang & Yanyan Jiang & Junmin Wu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Residents’ Participation in Waste Separation Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Kulsum, Umma & Alam, Muntasir & Kamrujjaman, Md., 2024. "Modeling and investigating the dilemma of early and delayed vaccination driven by the dynamics of imitation and aspiration," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    4. Guohui Song & Yongbin Wang, 2021. "Mainstream Value Information Push Strategy on Chinese Aggregation News Platform: Evolution, Modelling and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Sandholm,W.H., 2003. "Excess payoff dynamics, potential dynamics, and stable games," Working papers 5, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    6. Angelo Antoci & Simone Borghesi & Marcello Galeotti, 2013. "Environmental options and technological innovation: an evolutionary game model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 247-269, April.
    7. Hui Yu & Wei Wang & Baohua Yang & Cunfang Li, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Stress Effect of Cross-Regional Transfer of Resource-Exhausted Enterprises," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-16, November.
    8. Müller, Stephan, 2014. "The evolution of inequality aversion in a simplified game of life," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 219, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    9. Witte, Björn-Christopher, 2012. "Fund managers - Why the best might be the worst: On the evolutionary vigor of risk-seeking behavior," Economics Discussion Papers 2012-20, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    10. Antonio Cabrales & Giovanni Ponti, 2000. "Implementation, Elimination of Weakly Dominated Strategies and Evolutionary Dynamics," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 3(2), pages 247-282, April.
    11. Wenke Wang & Xiaoqiong You & Kebei Liu & Yenchun Jim Wu & Daming You, 2020. "Implementation of a Multi-Agent Carbon Emission Reduction Strategy under the Chinese Dual Governance System: An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Srinivas Arigapudi & Yuval Heller & Amnon Schreiber, 2023. "Heterogeneous Noise and Stable Miscoordination," Papers 2305.10301, arXiv.org.
    13. Giovanni Ponti, 2000. "Splitting The Baby In Two: How To Solve Solomon'S Dilemma When Agents Are Boundedly Rational," Working Papers. Serie AD 2000-08, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    14. Antonio E. Bernardo & Ivo Welch, 2001. "On the Evolution of Overconfidence and Entrepreneurs," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(3), pages 301-330, September.
    15. Miyaji, Kohei & Tanimoto, Jun, 2021. "The existence of fence-sitters relaxes the spatial prisoner’s dilemma and enhances network reciprocity," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).
    16. Armando J. Garcia Pires & José Pedro Pontes, 2021. "(De)Industrialization, Technology and Transportation," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 527-538, July.
    17. Gaudeul, Alexia & Keser, Claudia & Müller, Stephan, 2021. "The evolution of morals under indirect reciprocity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 251-277.
    18. Sivan Frenkel & Yuval Heller & Roee Teper, 2018. "The Endowment Effect As Blessing," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 59(3), pages 1159-1186, August.
    19. Anderhub, Vital & Guth, Werner & Marchand, Nadege, 2004. "Early or late conflict settlement in a variety of games - An experimental study," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 177-194, April.
    20. Deka, Aniruddha & Bhattacharyya, Samit, 2022. "The effect of human vaccination behaviour on strain competition in an infectious disease: An imitation dynamic approach," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 62-76.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:109:y:2018:i:c:p:265-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.